First Quarter: the Losers signalled their intention to dispute the validity of the crisis analysts had aligined to the poor performance they have been building up over time, which the Winners failed to compensate adequately for, after expectations of a severe deficit experienced a turnaround.
Second Quarter: going into a deep recession with confidence the crisis had been managed, the Losers held a position on the board that was not forecast by even the most optimistic, which generated uncertainty from observers that the Winners, managing to square the ledger, would negotiate the crisis.
Third Quarter: the Losers guaranteed the last recession would consolidate the crisis after they managed to confirm their position as an organisation bereft of class, which the Winners accentuated when they managed to stimulate the economy of their transference of the means with a margin.
Fourth Quarter: slumping in inverse proportion to their early rally, the Losers suffered severe pain across the board as they managed to reaffirm the perception of a deep crisis, which the Winners compounded with a share of free-flowing business and rebounding optimism, right across the board.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to retain some optimism from the outcome, "and we've got to look at the personnel and see who can take us forward and who can't", which contrasts sharply with the genuine management of confidence the Winners managed after managing a sharp rise in credit.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the gloom with the benefit of the welfare provided by the size and scope of the realistic target they managed to supply opportunity to, which the Losers had no viable option to limit, as they unearthed a future option going forward, and gave a good account.
Second Quarter: in a rapid slowing down, in a slippery climate, the Winners managed to acquit themselves adequately enough to sufficiently account for the Losers, which amounted to a sign of hope for them, as they managed to limit the impact the climate had on their business, overall.
Third Quarter: the Winners suffered a dramatic turnaround of their fortunes, as the deficit they had negotiated for the Losers became their sole property, going into the last recession, as the competition evened up the conditions for trading with bold initiatives they had stolen, going forward.
Fourth Quarter: owning a realistic target which doubled as a means of protecting the advantage, the Winners stole the margin which was the rightful property of the Losers, as they had struggled to generate opportunity for their future option going forward, which had gained them some credit, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to avoid the pressure of delivering accurate accounts for the poor figures they attracted to their performance, which merely intensified the scrutiny the Losers were placed under, as they struggled to maintain some credibilty in the stability of their unity.
First Quarter: the Winners struggled to manage viable levels of industry which generated a manageable deficit as the prospects of their targets being reached dwindled, which was due to the Losers costly mismanagement of processing opportunity into alignment with the board, and poor fortune.
Second Quarter: reaching their targets with great frequency through the abandonment of property gains for gains in real estate, the Winners managed a margin, which guaranteed the Losers a crisis in the midst of a period of a serious recession, and a possible restructuring of resources, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Winners, denied ownership of the means going forward, again manufactured a gain from limited opportunity after the recession abated, resulting in another period of intense uncertainty for the Losers, as they managed to hold the means for the majority, despite the board's report.
Fourth Quarter: a flurry of activity at board-level enhanced the position of the Winners as they increased the margin they had been working on, and boosted their figures over their real value, which summarises the account the Losers gave of their business in the final analysis: at all costs, panic in a crisis.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to avoid pay outs due to the savage enterprise of their old firm, "that was just the commitment that was showed among the group", which managed to balance the account of the Losers: "We didn't hit our targets, and also our decision-making was poor."
First Quarter: the Winners, served richly by their greatest asset: accountability in a contracting environment, managed to gain control of the positon on the board they bargained for, which put the Losers in the position of negotiating the recession with a plan to improve, or modify, their business.
Second Quarter: maintaining the position they had managed, and making minor gains across the board, the Winners negotiated the prospect of a major recession with another quarter, which the Losers made into another deficit, because the people in their organisation are of a poorer class.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed the period before the last recession with a loss that threatened to rob them of confidence, and potentially the absolute advantage, which the Losers had to take credit for, due to the surge they managed to produce from their industry and business dealings.
Fourth Quarter: managing to keep their interest in holding the position on the board they had managed, the Winners held on to control of the margin and added more value, despite a surge from the Losers, which took them to the brink of disaster as they got their business up and running, finally.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to transfer the responsibilty for the size of their margin to a shortfall in accurate measures taken in early trading, which sufficiently balanced with the account the Losers managed, and generally served to dupe observers into holding off on large payouts.
First Quarter: the Losers met expectations of an absolute advantage, in early trading, through the gain of a margin, which they acquired at the expense of the Winners, as they endeavoured to slash the deficit they had managed after continuing the gloomy forecasts predicted for their business.
Second Quarter: experiencing a severe downturn in their industry, the Losers headed towards the major recession with a deficit which threatened to last until the close, and delivered the Winners a boost to their struggling confidence, and was aligned to a surge very few observers bargained on.
Third Quarter: the Losers, in the absence of their captain of industry, delivered creditors a deflating forecast of the class in their structure and lack of future options, which pays no credit to the Winners, who negotiated the period following the recession with a distinct margin, from booming business.
Fourth Quarter: inaccurate measures and dwindling supplies of confidence manufactured the second consecutive quarter of negative growth in the Losers' deficit, as the Winners negotiated the margin they had worked hard to accrue, and, going forward, made confidence an acquisition to bank on.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempted to generate positive accounts of their industry, despite crediting a failure to capitalise on "opportunity" for their inequalities at board-level, as the Winners negotiated the terms with a slippery account of their position, in terms of the people in their business.
First Quarter: the Winners managed to acquire viable confidence from a small advantage, gained after negotiating the loss of a deficit, which the Losers had acquired through the management of the property in their possession, and relinquished at a considerable cost to their organisation.
Second Quarter: maintaining the enterprise that had generated their margin, the Winners managed a significant and lasting advantage through positive actions from critical decisions, as the Losers headed towards the major recession considering the possibility of a depression following the deficit.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated losing ownership of the means of production through the competent management of the competition at board-level, which is where the Losers failed to align their performance and industry, as they managed to negotiate only a small increase in productivity.
Fourth Quarter: managing to maintain their advantage, the Winners experienced a nervous period associated with a surge in the competition's anxiety, which transferred to the board, and was aligned to the increasingly volatile and uncertain climate generated by the Losers' crisis of confidence.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners appreciated the value of acquiring a deserved "reward" for their "hard work" and enterprise, which built "confidence" in their business, and reversed the sentiments of the Losers, as they attempted to transfer the pressure of a crisis into the easing of a major depression.
First Quarter: the Winners failed to fulfill expectations by recording a deficit that was a product of their inaccurate measures in aligning the means of production with their goals, which gave the Losers confidence in accounting for their competition, and unsustainable enterprise going forward.
Second Quarter: continuing their expensive measurements, the Winners accounted for their deficit and manufactured a margin through their viable business, which generated legitimate concern from the Losers over their generational decline in credible practices distributing the means.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to generate concern from observers for the overall package, despite the industry of their business providing analysts reason to offer credit, which the Losers managed to stall through their unsustainable business and the liability of their distribution.
Fourth Quarter: led by the board to believe that their gain was in danger, the Winners managed to stimulate observers through the performance of a single asset, which allowed the Losers to gain a loss which reflected poorly on their performance, and managed to reflect the discrepancy in class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners distributed credit for their profit evenly across the board and indicated to observers that the surge in productivity was a product of growth, which discounted the Losers' shortfall in class and the lack of viable targets in their structure, and poor vision going forwards.
First Quarter: the Winners, after early trading, countered resistance to their productivity from their competitor's measures by monopolising control at the board-level. The Losers forced remaining creditors to reassess their investment in a return to liquidity with a significant loss of productivity of their manufacture of returns on the board.
Second Quarter: with a number of options to be taken into account, the Winners extended their margin as the recession loomed and inaccuracies registered on the board threatened. The Losers increased their industry and, largely due to accurate record-keeping from the board, were liable to give analysts enough interest to return as creditors.
Third Quarter: the Winners turned the recession into a crisis, albeit their stocks decimated by a loss of fortune, with a massive turnaround in their costs. The Losers made a substantial deficit a gain of one small point due to their industry employing the services of their structure and the equal distribution of productivity, in a turnaround.
Fourth Quarter: confidence in their systems gave the the Winners the means to produce enough exploitation of opportunity and turn around a stagnating turnover. The Losers lost the means of production which stalled the growth of their productivity and caused their bubble to burst, to the absolute disadvantage of their position on the board.
Fifth Quarter: tired industry was given as the major reason why the Winners failed to monopolise productivity on the board as credit was relinquished to their competitors. The Losers passed credit for their improved industry on and attempted to defraud analysts into putting pressure on to their competitors, who, cyclically, reciprocated the measures.
First Quarter: despite the hopeful forecasts, there was an early rally across the board that saw the Losers make terrible losses in key sectors. Restructuring in key positions and a scaling back of smaller industries meant the Winners made substantial gains thanks to opportunities created by industry.
Second Quarter: the Losers invested a major part of their plan in key performers whose accountability and value has to be seriously questioned after the margin slipped early. The Winners investment in their own resources earned them their fortunate dividend from their gambling ways as their margin widened.
Third Quarter: hampered by a lack of hard-nosed business acumen around the decisive areas, the Losers lived up to their tags and continued their spiral downwards. The Winners, profitting from exuberant investment in new resources, also made use of their key gains in long-term trading solutions.
Fourth Quarter: lacking the kind of cohesion in their structure because of a lack of real industry, the Losers also had to resign themselves to crumbling under the pressure of their rivals. The Winners, sharing the spoils of their hard-earned industrial revolution, showed the benefits of thinking long-term about structure in their business.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers, struggling to own up to their embarassing losses, made their short-term trading strategy worse by poor decisons at the top level. The Winners, revelling in their confidence, profitted healthily from a balance of new and old industry, despite the inexperience of the man in charge.
MY CHILDHOOD POETRY HERO
Marquis de Sade, a true writing genius who could literally hurt anyone he liked. I was at the convent when he first started to establish himself as one of the world's great players and later had the privilege of calling into question his often ludicrous treatment of women. Whether it was with sodomy or oral fixations, he brought excitement to the punishment of every man he ever met, not to mention a video recorder.
MY CHILDHOOD PROSE HERO
Voltaire, a magnificent hater of Shakespeare who had a beautiful smile and could make life seem so much more complicated than it actually is. In his wariness of the Arabs he was way ahead of his time and he had a happy knack of having a squishy arse.
MY IDEA OF THE PERFECT POET
Valerie Solanas and Ted Bundy rolled into one would produce the perfect poet. Valerie has excellent ideas about the way words go together: particularly 'men' and 'chainsaw', while Ted is one of the most imaginative performance-artists of all time.
MY IDEA OF THE PERFECT PROSE WRITER
Margaret Thatcher, who has heart, liver, lungs and pure blood running through her abnormally narrow veins resulting in occasional dizzy spells and lapses of concentration. In her early days she was a Pakistani man but has since developed a womb and a uterus with which she can accommodate a parasite.
FOR THE RECORD
Caroline Wilson was born after her mother spread her legs before she was even conceived. She is an adventurous sexual partner with a wonderful imagination and a nose for smelling out bulls in season. A procession of slaughtered calves will vouch for the fact that she could, on her day, have your head on a spike. She is a useful typist but could, with a fall down the stairs, make a half-decent wife or husband.
The Vanquished, very bald nasties with facial cleansing screams, engraved in a wormwrestle with their bladder animus from the very forced, as both startled strangely but the Victors had the bladder of it, by a whisper.
The Victors, all eyes on their inherited gaudiness, continued appearing pleasured while they dimmed doubt on their rations while their animus, hoarding behind sinner's bags, munched them shit for shit in a wart of contrition.
The Vanquished, at the heffer, cowered behind their bunks, tackled a little nappie, pelted their feet up and hated a few meagre missiles, while their animus, fingernails a blouse, got the good toilet and shat down for a sieve.
The Victors, winkers in bumming, took the thing by the scoff of the norks in the turdy skirt, as their frittered arrivals, hosted by foragers, still nipping quaintly, woke up to the morsels scorching past their arses and into the very war.
The Vanquished, drooling on their reverses of anarchy, hit back late but misfired too often to hurt the shade of the boring, as their bitter bowels hungered on for grimey death, but were clad for the bile to bewrung when it did, finally.
The Togglers, fannily clicking, have, wall and drilly, smooched the Emos, loosening their gripe on the rodeo, on the lisp, stunk the dung in, as the two exchanged puddley flowers.
The Emos, on the deceiving end, rolled their arse back in their heads, as the Togglers, worming up for a bit of a snorkel, pulled out all the strumpets and wanked, growling away.
The Togglers, their ear coming to a head, extended their weed to a healthly margarine, while the Emos, faked in the head and licking balls, rang everywhere but the right spats, my lass!
The Emos, a noir to blacken their gnome, have had one of those yearns that laughs at its oaf, as the Togglers, twee cubed, lark back at a few gaunt lopes forward; hear the crapping?
The Toggers, on the back of their ear, are licking a head to the necks as they lick through their arse, as they do, the Emos, a lobeless ear, lick a forehead to much more mystery, ahas.
You can tell a wally by the way he wears his air, as the Togglers so apely demenstruated to the Dackers as they took them to the cloners, warped the floor with 'em and said things.
The Dackers, list for words, shat there and took it like a maniac; pants down and wanking their arse out; the Togglers, plotting up the bloody miss, always had the grin in hand, just!
They held their knave, cussed the pill into each other's hinds and all the time spelled like wowsers, as the Dackers, tartening up, blushed at the thought of shit mammories; jerking!
Their ear has been no jerk, I killed you not, they've waltzed that many crass snatches; obversely, the Togglers have had a chummed laugh, and are still a mythomaniac's chins.
Pat and tickle me, they have the Emos, who's points hinge around their uncle's - a wank's a wink; while the Dackers cross out their yearn with their eyes handed on a prelate, the Piss.
From the farthest wretches of the great shout, the prayers in the black and yelling upshit the more fannied prayers in the blown and cold: what a shock for the pounders that the longshit wink, wink.
The blown and cold, its ployers whittling their behinds and nut their girls, oily, heave themselves to brine; buttock nothing away from the shallow and black: they prayed one yell of a grin!
Lackeys for them, they had the sin of a bull ruminating the paddock and shaking topical grubs at inopportune minutae; for the brown end coalers it was a chase of: "Not tonight; I have a hindache."
Their recent farm has been so itchy as to suggest that they will have to goad the knacker sooner than hopped; for the yelling sloshed brickers, it's been a grey tear: they, moist, furnish it new.
With evil attention, I can shuffley say they will get the bonks on the uncle-wearers from the wish; the ploughing goaders should, and I stretch should, get the jam doughnut on the pig-birds of the pig's eye.
Add Comments
Comments (2)