Wikipedia describes Barry Hall as: "a subtype of intracranial hemorrhage that occurs within the brain tissue itself. Intracerebral hemorrhage can be caused by brain trauma, or it can occur spontaneously in hemorrhagic stroke. Non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage is a spontaneous bleeding into the brain tissue."
Wikipedia describes Cerebral Hemorrhage as: "best known for his playing career with the Sydney Swans. He was one of the club's best players and onfield leaders, topping the Swans goalkicking between (2002-2007) and captaining the side on numerous occasions including the club's drought breaking premiership in 2005.
Wikipedia describes the Brent Staker Incident as: "the permanent cessation of reproductive fertility some time before the end of the natural lifespan. The term was originally used to describe this reproductive change in human females, where the end of fertility was traditionally indicated by the permanent stopping of Barry Hall."
Wikipedia describes Menopause as: "marred by a reputation for onfield aggression which has earned him the label of football "wild man" and he became one of the most feared players on the field. Several controversial and highly publicized incidents (often called "brain snaps" by the media) and tribunal appearances have interrupted his career."
Barry Hall describes Wikipedia as: "exhibiting systemic bias and inconsistency; critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for much of the information makes it unreliable. Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia is generally reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not always clear. "
First Quarter: the Winners made a modest return for the quarter despite falling behind in the early exchanges, and allowed their group to hand creditors a massive boost, as they continued the trend they had been following in limiting the Losers through the proficient running of their business.
Second Quarter: managing a savage monopoly of the means and a serious surge from the board, the Winners guaranteed their group's confidence would continue unabated, which proved to have adverse effects on the deficit the Losers were attempting to downplay, as recession proved inevitable.
Third Quarter: the Winners experienced a severe contraction of the size and scope of the deficit they had bought for the opposition to their group, which allayed fears analysts had that the Losers are a spent force, and gave their creditors cause to manage their alarm with an injection of calm.
Fourth Quarter: not managing the opposition to their group's business as effectively as hoped, the Winners ended the day's trading with a margin sufficient to send a message to the industry, which was aided by the massive losses the Losers had made in previous periods, and couldn't be erased enough.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners were rightly gratified by the gains they had made at the table, which they attributed to the confidence they had generated from the previous opposition, which made the opposition the Losers put forward an uncertain and lacking group of enitities with no business here.
First Quarter: the Winners managed to manage a massive margin in a period of growth not forecast by even the most optimistic creditors, which transferred a deficit to the Losers as the philosophy generating their going forward, across the board, created the pursuit of individual gain, for a loss.
Second Quarter: pursuing more value to add to their interest, the Winners managed to enhance the position on the board they had managed in the previous period, which created more uncertainty for the Losers, as they went into the next recession with a deficit that required savage slashes.
Third Quarter: the Winners continued a trend of misdirecting their key actions in the face of their ultimate goals, which cost them another gain in a period they otherwise owned, and allowed the Losers, attempting to resolve their issues, to dupe the board into poor accounts of the state of play.
Fourth Quarter: boosting the size of the deficit they were managing marginally, the Winners resumed business after the last recession with the addition of more ascendancy on the board, which transferred incredible pressure to the credible accounts the Losers would try and manage going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners accounted for the control they managed with reports of the belief they're building, which is a fair reflection of the business going on inside their business, and was in marked contrast to the poor report the Losers managed of being "at a loss" to explain the very poor loss.
First Quarter: the Losers consolidated their share with an erroneous account on the board of the true worth of the performance they managed, and a gain, which the Winners, managing a reputation of slowness in early trading, restricted the impact of with the returns they managed to serve.
Second Quarter: a period of inflation of loss of interest marked the Losers' sloppy accounting practices, and a sudden and minor decrease in the deficit they managed for the Winners, which contracted due to the efficient alignment they managed in matching the means to their absolute ends.
Third Quarter: the Losers suffered a severe and savage turnaround of their fortunes in the period, as the deficit they had been managing for the Winners became their sole property, which indicated to the competition that the comparative advantage they inherited was an absolute one.
Fourth Quarter: two consecutive quarters of negative growth signalled to the Losers that a radical restructuring across the board is an absolute necessity, going forward, which the Winners created in the class they expoited going forward, and the figures they manage in their operations.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers took full responsibility for the negative outcome they managed, which they placed the majority share of to their developing resources, and declined to pay credit to the Winners, as they attempted to attribute the outcome to their management of the "slowing down".
First Quarter: the Losers declined observers any interest as they managed to restrict the flow of the business of turnover on the board, which generated only a minor deficit, as the Winners, struggling to manage in the absence of some class, negotiated the period with a minimal damage, and a gain.
Second Quarter: their deficit suffering from inflation, the Losers went into the major recession with a severe depression generated by the disintegration of their confidence, which the Winners accentuated through the business of performing enterprisingly that one single resource managed for them.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to contract the discrepancy in class, which they aligned to the figures the board managed at certain stages, despite the deficit continuing to inflate, as the Winners, doing the business, negotiated the forecast surge of the competition's old firm.
Fourth Quarter: after the last recession the Losers continued to manage their deficit as inflation generated a substantial loss of a certain percentage they brought to the table, which reversed the result for the Winners, as they spent the last period, manufacturing another gain, effectively.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the size and scope of the deficit they managed to the class of the structure they struggled with, and made accurate assessments across the board, which was met by the Winners with a good account of their implementation of the strategy they had devised.
First Quarter: the Winners, served richly by their greatest asset: accountability in a contracting environment, managed to gain control of the positon on the board they bargained for, which put the Losers in the position of negotiating the recession with a plan to improve, or modify, their business.
Second Quarter: maintaining the position they had managed, and making minor gains across the board, the Winners negotiated the prospect of a major recession with another quarter, which the Losers made into another deficit, because the people in their organisation are of a poorer class.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed the period before the last recession with a loss that threatened to rob them of confidence, and potentially the absolute advantage, which the Losers had to take credit for, due to the surge they managed to produce from their industry and business dealings.
Fourth Quarter: managing to keep their interest in holding the position on the board they had managed, the Winners held on to control of the margin and added more value, despite a surge from the Losers, which took them to the brink of disaster as they got their business up and running, finally.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to transfer the responsibilty for the size of their margin to a shortfall in accurate measures taken in early trading, which sufficiently balanced with the account the Losers managed, and generally served to dupe observers into holding off on large payouts.
First Quarter: the Winners took ownwership of the board through the rapid minimisation of the liability in their organisation to think like millionaires in a property dispute, which met, equally, the margin the Losers generated through the poverty of class in their highly structured environment.
Second Quarter: managing to generate a sufficient abundance of inequality at board-level, the Winners managed, accurately, the means against their ultimate goals, which created substantial debts for the Losers, as any creditors they had demanded immediate returns to enterprising vision.
Third Quarter: the Winners, managing to restrict the impact the expected surge from the competition would produce, went into the last minor recession with a massive margin, which the Losers, after two consecutive quarters of negative results, managed to make of only fractionally less daunting magnitude.
Fourth Quarter: working towards gaining confidence, the Winners endeavoured to retain the advantage they had acquired, and absolutely did so, as the Losers, settling down to give a more accurate account of the discrepancies in class across the board, made their deficit acceptable to creditors.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the advantage their workers had acquired to the enterprising attitude passed on to them from higher up in their organisation, which added value to assessments of the Losers that without a rapidly contracting environment they manage to lose effectiveness.
First Quarter: the Winners struggled to manage the manufacturing department of realistic targets going forward, and registered a marginal deficit as the Losers stole the initiative, despite inaccurate measures costing them a greater advantage, which was expensive in the long-term.
Second Quarter: restructuring their business to meet the needs of the competition, the Winners accounted for their deficit before adding substantial value to their advantage, which generated a legitimate concern from creditors that the Losers were in the recession with a pessimistic outlook.
Third Quarter: the Winners limited the liability of their class through industry and a perpetually contracting environment to give every indication of an absolute advantage, which the Losers turned into a major depression for nervous creditors, as they turned into the last recession with a bleak forecast.
Fourth Quarter: opening the early exchange period unproductively, the Winners managed to record a small enough loss for the quarter to generate a significant continuation of their advantage over the Losers, who managed to continue to struggle to manufacture interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed an accurate assessment of their share of the result and applied measures to pass on credit to their "long term" options, and a share to the Losers, who negotiated the depression by attributing their position to their failure to grasp the meaning of "numerous opportunities".
First Quarter: the Losers managed to register poor returns at the board-level in difficult conditions as slippery creditors passed themselves off as analysts in a bid to defraud observers, who managed to take stock of the account given of the Winners' handling of the environment and exploitation of their targets going forward with capacious economy.
Second Quarter: a loss of fortune generated a false attribution of a decline from creditors after the Losers managed to simulate a doubling of their deficit through their deteriorating capital which failed to account for the credit due to the Winners, who managed to free up their capital and, in the climate, manufactured excellent rewards for their work.
Third Quarter: the Losers negotiated the period following the major recession through their steady output and their committment to their organisation, which creditors endeavoured to conceal and supplied the Winners with no account for their dwindling margin, except for their continuing industry and their competitors' inaccurate measures.
Fourth Quarter: slippery creditors supplied observers with a meagre account of the Losers ineptitude in registering productivity on the board and compromised their legitimacy which was also distributed to the Winners, who added a small gain to their overall margin which analysts had to attribute to their legitimate targets and accuracy with the means.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempts to divert a depression caused by their declining industry were given added value by creditors passing fraudulent accounts off as legitimate and denying analysts any raw material with which to invest interest in the Winners, except for speculations going forward, which reinforced the presence of slippery accounts.
First Quarter: the Losers secured an early advantage due to the productivity of a secondary option forcing their competitors to accept concessions that proved to be unsustainable. The Winners suffered the repercussions of a costly early lapse of accounting for their competitors' manageable investment in industry, but snapped the trend.
Second Quarter: in a reverse of the early turn-around, the Losers failed to produce what they produce best due to restrictions placed on their heavy industry and a surge in the numbers of analysts. Making use of locally abundant factors to surge to a comparative advantage, but an absolute loss, the Winners were paid immediate dividends by creditors.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to turn the recession into a sizeable deficit after an intense early trading period and the inaccuracy of speculations offered by their small opportunity. The Winners balanced a small fortune with their indefatigable industrial outlook to turn-around their deficit and post a margin that raised the interest of analysts.
Fourth Quarter: the downward spiral of costly business on the board continued for the Losers through the doubling of their margin but for a couple of points, despite the fraudulent interest of creditors. In a boost for their stocks, the Winners manufactured a significant share of the board's turnover and rallied late to stretch the point.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempted to defraud observers into buying that the loss was not a product of their declining business, which served to give analysts the means. The Winners attributed their stunning gain to their established industry and highlighted the need for due diligence in adversity through modest performances of excellence.
First Quarter: the Losers handballed responsibility for achieving their goals at a time when their resources were able to sustain accountability at manageable levels. The Winners took away a significant and unexpected loss after their competitors increased their investment in a sharply contracting environment.
Second Quarter: under a distinct slowing down of trade, the Losers experienced a hypertrophy of their sector but managed to hold on to their overall gain despite their dwindling margin. The Winners invested heavily in their own industry and cut back their deficit due to their increased enterprise, in the slow-down.
Third Quarter: the Losers gave their creditors reason to lose interest when they failed to do anything on the board after the major recession became a crisis in depression. The Winners turned the major recession into a boom for their organisation and held their competitors to account on the board with a margin.
Fourth Quarter: a disorderly contraction in supply for the Losers' key forces was negotiated on the board by a late surge in confidence from their unrealistic targets. After booming confidence subsided, the Winners were forced to negotiate a contraction of their margin despite their creditors gaining interest.
Fifth Quarter: a predicted steep decline in the Losers' productivity gave their creditors many reasons to forecast a period of slowing down, if not a depression. The Winners exhibited socialistic methodologies as they endeavoured to share the products of their industry across the board, in the midst of a depression.
The Victors, nasties on a bald-hair day, took themselves to an unfamiliar paddock where they dealt hoarsely with the Vanquished, who, vanishing in a hole of their own mucking, wiffed the white undies and went underground.
The Vanquished, hosting the occasion of their untombly demise, stuttered brightly enough, but the Victors, hanging on for dreary life, saw the air with their hands thus, and, on foreign soil, dug a hole and shat anything that moved.
The Victors, all guns braising, marched to the major prick ducking and waving through hostile derangement as the Vanquished, taking potshits at the foreign inveiglers, took a rest and shat their arse for a few wanks.
The Vanquished, farts asleep, took to the turd squirter like a hat-knife to blithering Yids but it all accounted to a nutter as the Victors, perusing the paddlefield with clean arses, put the foot down and truncated a wrong sentence.
The Victors, factual in the extreme, piled on the mystery in the rusty squirter as the harmed sides, on stretchers, felt in a screaming weep - the Vanquished, in disparate trouble, couldn't wait for the siren to read them to rust.
The Dullblogs, a shudder of the shade they once wore, crammed the Swines, farting into absurdity; editing their ear and grafting their vowels a freak kiss in front. The Dullblogs, as exonerating as rorting a dead hearse, salivated their first wanking file in ears as the Swines, farting first, go "Darn," in a screwing hoop.
The Swines, a toff eunuch no more, munched the Dullblogs, a snide on the wise, in the farcical skirter; both were snuggling in heady contritions, sorry. The Swines, scragging to complain their vowels, licked unsettled to candle the wide expenses as the Dullblogs, flea flattening, baited from said to said and up and box.
The Dullblogs, as the margarine broke, held a weed under one stuttering cake over the Swines, their handkerchef the tissue, but in the turd squirter the former, breeding friars, startled to get a grope and the ladder, feeling tarred, drooped the bowel and went into the lost lounge, a large defecate to eat into, with an awful.
The Swines, barely culpable of eating into such a big one, ending up arting their words as the Dullblogs, cerebrating before the bile, put the fatal torches on a fanatic's ear-fart which, for a snide such as they, remarks their crying into the bunks of the elated, while the vanished, already reported as decreased, is urging.
The Dullblogs, nowhere to be sane, have to queer up for a shit at the granny, as sold as two mitts herself, and the only thong straddling on their thigh is the Coots, as mild as a hotty and twitchy as birth, in a pope-hopper. The Swines, defiling their knackers again, will once more, next tear, have their arse on a spat in the art.
The Swines, filthy minimalists and patiently indelible, have found factory in illumination over the Cankers, arching a lover and falling out of flavour. The lass leaves a bald paste in the mouth, but nut if you're bollocks for the Swines: you're over the moo.
The Cankers, conversely if you rort for them, startled inversely to how they vanished, as the Swines, rorting around in the mind, felt behinds; it wasn't too lung before they, a meaty pinch of forgets, got it to tug ether, as the Cankers felt font and pissed doubt.
The Swines, in no drought whatsover, poked up these licks after the moaning duck and grinned a hatful of margarine that proved nut-rings; the Cankers, vanishing thirst, washed on as their coy prayers, not a triumvirate, went Muslim - faced Maccas and farted.
The Cankers, another afraid complain, have had a nap, a drown and a sleazing - they need to cut off the dud weeds; the Swines, heard to write toffily, are, to the amusement of money, stll olive and cocking - they've got their arse on their prayers: I feel font.
The Swines, tickling tits one whack at a time, will glib themselves every chin-sieve: the Dullblogs - not on friar, not one tit. Meanwhile, the Cankers, mouldy and shreaking, face a few heard forks: they're goaded in the regular sleazing but, clap in the last mouth.
Comments (5)
Add Comments