Wikipedia describes Barry Hall as: "a subtype of intracranial hemorrhage that occurs within the brain tissue itself. Intracerebral hemorrhage can be caused by brain trauma, or it can occur spontaneously in hemorrhagic stroke. Non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage is a spontaneous bleeding into the brain tissue."
Wikipedia describes Cerebral Hemorrhage as: "best known for his playing career with the Sydney Swans. He was one of the club's best players and onfield leaders, topping the Swans goalkicking between (2002-2007) and captaining the side on numerous occasions including the club's drought breaking premiership in 2005.
Wikipedia describes the Brent Staker Incident as: "the permanent cessation of reproductive fertility some time before the end of the natural lifespan. The term was originally used to describe this reproductive change in human females, where the end of fertility was traditionally indicated by the permanent stopping of Barry Hall."
Wikipedia describes Menopause as: "marred by a reputation for onfield aggression which has earned him the label of football "wild man" and he became one of the most feared players on the field. Several controversial and highly publicized incidents (often called "brain snaps" by the media) and tribunal appearances have interrupted his career."
Barry Hall describes Wikipedia as: "exhibiting systemic bias and inconsistency; critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for much of the information makes it unreliable. Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia is generally reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not always clear. "
First Quarter: the Losers guaranteed their organisation a break in the form of a recession, after a period in which they managed to have analysts forecast a savage loss, and was, in large part, due to the Winners and the industry they managed to distribute, as they went forward with a target in mind.
Second Quarter: slashing the deficit, the Losers looked the goods for the period as they managed to capitalise on the limited entries their business managed on their account, which generated a sudden tremor in the solid business of maintaining confidence the Winners have built up over a period of time.
Third Quarter: the Losers shocked observers with a sudden and sustained turnaround, delivering two consecutive quarters of positive figures going into the last recession, which had the Winners, at a loss, managing a deficit of their own, and the option of a gloomy result forecast by poor analysts.
Fourth Quarter: suffering a savage stagnation, the Losers managed to acquit themselves as a potentially sound investment for the future despite the loss, which the Winners owned after surging to a position on the board they are accustomed to, in a productive period for solid business.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers, managing to remain calm despite the strong showing, delivered an account which managed to convey the general optimism of their outlook, and contrasted sharply with the general mood of a slump the Winners are experiencing, as their confidence threatens their output.
First Quarter: the Winners implemented the organisation of their group around the movements of the competition and managed to make a substantial dividend for their share, which the Losers had no option to minimise as they attempted to get their business going across the board, going forward.
Second Quarter: the margin they managed contracting, the Winners laboured to generate enterprise going into a deep recession, which they managed with a margin, as the Losers, their business up and running, slashed their deficit in a protected environment, and looked the goods, indeed.
Third Quarter: the Winners, struggling to extend the class in their system, suffered a second consecutive quarter of contraction to the deficit they managed for the Losers, which allowed them to deliver a massive boost in confidence to their poor creditors, many of whom deserved to be paid out.
Fourth Quarter: following the last recession, the Winners lost yet more of the gains they had made in earlier exchanges, which proved ample in the overall scheme, as the Losers, negotiating without the benefit of their full entitlements, put a viable plan in place to garner good interest, in the future.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to make the ever decreasing margin they managed into a lesson in educating their personnel across the board, which the Losers met with a poor attempt to pass their account off as a means to make themselves liable to be truthful, and avoided a hefty pay out.
First Quarter: the Winners withstood the pressure of the competition, and managed to restrict the severity of the damage the impact of the share they managed of the means had, which the Losers, virtually controlled for the majority, as they went forward with unsubstantiated optimism, and a loss.
Second Quarter: generating cohesion from savagery in conflict, the Winners capitalised on the capital liabilities of the competition with an absolute takeover of the board, which left the Losers, struggling to account for the competition, headed for a major recession, with a deep depression.
Third Quarter: the Winners added more value to the demands of creditors as they continued to disadvantage the competition, going forward and across the board, which maintained the depression for the Losers, as they managed to offer their creditors signs of interest, despite the gloom.
Fourth Quarter: manufacturing a fourth consecutive quarter of unprecedented gains, the Winners valued integrity over their position on the board, which they managed anyway, despite the Losers, battlers in a crisis, adding value to the perception of incompetence of personnel, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed their accounts effectively as they highlighted "the big business" they operate in, and the discrepancies between analysts and "work ethic", which was more than the Losers could manage, after key statements about the outcome they managed went missing.
First Quarter: the Winners secured the benefits of control of the environment from the position on the board they managed due to the peformance their business made, which guaranteed a long-term management issue for the Losers as they endeavoured to manage a deficit, going forward.
Second Quarter: due to the poor efficiency they managed at board-level, the Winners secured a marginal gain toadd to their overall margin, which accounted for their advantage over the Losers, as they struggled with the shortfall of class they were forced to manage, and produced a poor account.
Third Quarter: the Winners virtually guaranteed themselves an absolute advantage, despite their mismanagement of opportunity continuing to minimise the size of their control, which gave the Losers another sign of their decline, as they managed to increase their deficit, in a deep depression.
Fourth Quarter: handing back some of the gains they had acquired before the last recession, the Winners allowed themselves to decrease the intensity of the depression they were managing to give the Losers, which, in the long-term, guaranteed them some slight surge in confidence.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners gave an accurate account of the overall position they had manufactured on the board, and added value to the "strong performance" they managed, which added gloom to the reports the Losers gave of their work-rate because, they "couldn't fault their endeavour".
First Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficiency of assets in the current climate by managing to squander, going forward, the comparative advantage of the situation, which managed to defer the transfer of credit, acquired through the discipline of their organisation, to the Winners, until now.
Second Quarter: the grim assessments of the board compounded the stagnant productivity of the Losers with the liabilty of their excessive individualism, which was accelerated by the structured industry of the Winners delivering a productive return from the manufacture of opportunity.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to stall the advancing excess of the competition through the manageable acquisition of opportunity and no small amount of fortune, as the Winners negotiated the expected surge in the competition, which was managed securely by the business of their discipline.
Fourth Quarter: the poverty of their account stimulated the Losers sufficiently to manage only the smallest of losses for a substantial overall deficit, which was an indication of the effect that two consecutive quarters of massive gains on the board, aligned to performance, delivered the Winners, initially.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers failed to supply analysts with credible accounts of their shortfall through the excessive attribution of credit to their competition, which served as an accurate account of the discrepancy between them and the Winners, who managed to acquit their business accurately.
First Quarter: the Winners manufactured a comparative advantage on the board that was aligned with the performance of their targets, which they reached due to the inclination of their industry and the poverty of the Losers', which delivered damage to the aspirations of their business.
Second Quarter: recording only a minor change to their margin, the Winners went into the inevitable recession still managing to hold their competition to account, which served to accelerate the fraudulent perception the Losers held that their business was heading in the right direction.
Third Quarter: the Winners continued the relative productivity of their manufacturing, and kept the costs of going forward down due to the position their business managed, which put organisational pressure on the unsustainable, and negligible, industry of the Losers' business.
Fourth Quarter: continuing to manage the minimisation of the competition's productivity in a contracting environment, the Winners recorded a massive margin through consistently accountable practices, which reduced the Losers to welcoming the smallest turnover on the board with interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast a continuation of the acquisition of overall gains which, "Clearly you'd rather get [them] in the bank than not get [them] in the bank," which the Losers have yet to manage, as expectations of their proficiency, in terms of industry, continued to slide.
First Quarter: the Winners managed the operation of their business through the discipline of their organisation and a structure which allowed their class to capitalise on the Losers' failure to develop an effective strategy going forward for managing the rapidly expanding deficit, after a period of early trading gave observers signs of interest in credit.
Second Quarter: aligning performance with figures, the Winners manufactured maximum productivity for their industry on the board through accurately measuring the means against their goals and the Losers' dwindling supply, which declined dramatically due to an excessive lack of accounting for their competitors' organisation and their own shortfall.
Third Quarter: the Winners' explosively accelerating gains were stalled by the major recession which allowed them to assess the collective benefits of their partnership which had the effect of allowing the Losers to increase the dividends from their mediocre performance, which had the net effect of delaying the decline of interest in some quarters.
Fourth Quarter: generating significant additional gains, the Winners profitted from their application to their organisation, which is built on the distribution of manufacture through reachable targets, which had the impact of driving the Losers into a near-depression after counting the cost of a structure made redundant through their lack of class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed their massive margin to the turnover their board generated through accurate measures and the pressure their organisation placed on the Losers, who supplied analysts with alarming reports about their dwindling industry which amounts to a loss of confidence in their organisation and sustainable expectations.
First Quarter: in a sharply contracting environment, the Losers distributed responsibility for productivity in an attempt to stimulate liquidity from the running of their business. The Winners, owed an outstanding debt, placed pressure on their competitors' supply and capitalised on their breaks with efficient productivity from their viable targets.
Second Quarter: the Losers gave creditors reason to lose pessimism with an improved performance on the board - equated to confidence in their efficient distribution. The Winners manufactured a small loss for an overall margin that had them headed for the recession with renewed optimism in a moderately saturated environment.
Third Quarter: held to account for the running of their business, the Losers went into a decline that precipitated a pessimistic outlook from their creditors that lent confidence to observers. The Winners capitalised on their absolute advantage with the manufacture of productive gains recorded on the board from opportunistic business practices.
Fourth Quarter: the Losers profitted from the benefit of modest initial gains which were rapidly converted into a massive deterioration of the margin as the pressure decimated their industry. The Winners cornered their competitors' share of the means of production in the difficult environment and surged to huge gains with their productivity soaring.
Fifth Quarter: forced to account for their losses to analysts, the Losers gave creditors reason to question their interest under the pressure of a contraction of growth in the running of their business. The Winners utilised the pressure of a contracting environment they were largely responsible for creating and gained the interest of analysts, if not observers.
First Quarter: the Losers handballed responsibility for achieving their goals at a time when their resources were able to sustain accountability at manageable levels. The Winners took away a significant and unexpected loss after their competitors increased their investment in a sharply contracting environment.
Second Quarter: under a distinct slowing down of trade, the Losers experienced a hypertrophy of their sector but managed to hold on to their overall gain despite their dwindling margin. The Winners invested heavily in their own industry and cut back their deficit due to their increased enterprise, in the slow-down.
Third Quarter: the Losers gave their creditors reason to lose interest when they failed to do anything on the board after the major recession became a crisis in depression. The Winners turned the major recession into a boom for their organisation and held their competitors to account on the board with a margin.
Fourth Quarter: a disorderly contraction in supply for the Losers' key forces was negotiated on the board by a late surge in confidence from their unrealistic targets. After booming confidence subsided, the Winners were forced to negotiate a contraction of their margin despite their creditors gaining interest.
Fifth Quarter: a predicted steep decline in the Losers' productivity gave their creditors many reasons to forecast a period of slowing down, if not a depression. The Winners exhibited socialistic methodologies as they endeavoured to share the products of their industry across the board, in the midst of a depression.
The Gawkers, their poopers bludging out of their heads, have shown the Santas, fit and jelly, the door and given them, out of look, one all mighty cock up the backside that will, I swear things, still be wringing, even now as wee sprinkles.
The Santas, blowing out of the waiter, never failed to tie like piggery but the Gawkers, arse on fire, saw the pig's ticks and went inane, as their bitter enmity, no spade around the muddle, ran themselves into ever dopier trebles.
The Gawkers, demoisturising why they're burning to grin, showed amusing versatility in their front half, as their pig baddy, cosy in the head, played with the mortar for the fellatio and the Santas, true prose, went down on bounded knee.
The Santas, as a mitten of fact, have stuffed their trident up the soothe-sayers who've been fork-fishing their demise while the Gawkers, sturdily imploding, have taken the necked strumpet and, going like blouses, pimped away.
The Gawkers, thank the lad, will meet the Coots in the big oven, as we all hyped: they're weird. I can hardly walk. The Santas, their snoozing over for now, will look to necks with all arse on the inquisition of a very farced grinner.
The Victors, nasties on a bald-hair day, took themselves to an unfamiliar paddock where they dealt hoarsely with the Vanquished, who, vanishing in a hole of their own mucking, wiffed the white undies and went underground.
The Vanquished, hosting the occasion of their untombly demise, stuttered brightly enough, but the Victors, hanging on for dreary life, saw the air with their hands thus, and, on foreign soil, dug a hole and shat anything that moved.
The Victors, all guns braising, marched to the major prick ducking and waving through hostile derangement as the Vanquished, taking potshits at the foreign inveiglers, took a rest and shat their arse for a few wanks.
The Vanquished, farts asleep, took to the turd squirter like a hat-knife to blithering Yids but it all accounted to a nutter as the Victors, perusing the paddlefield with clean arses, put the foot down and truncated a wrong sentence.
The Victors, factual in the extreme, piled on the mystery in the rusty squirter as the harmed sides, on stretchers, felt in a screaming weep - the Vanquished, in disparate trouble, couldn't wait for the siren to read them to rust.
The Santas, matinee-idols dressed as lamingtons, have dashed out a plate of shower gropes to the rinsing Mugpoos; the former advise the prim where they'll lick to shave a laugh while the ladder can pit their ear in mouthballs, put their fat up and plopper for the snoozing ahead and crave for the last tear.
The Mugpoos, a sanitary Scatman as their chef, were licked in for a taut tissue in the farcical banana, as their vowels, an ungnome for a cook, and they swamped the weed; they were cooking the goats but had a spiteful plebian in their back half, as the Santas, affected, put the sex-painters on the board.
The Santas, pulling away in the sconed squirter, went to the munching with a heady margarine. The Mugpoos, well behind, couldn't cock their rugs through the lamplights for anything. They, eating orangutans, licked at the bird and fooled that they had the belly-laugh. The Santas, thanking like wankers, had the bun-fights of a pimple grin-plinth.
The Mugpoos, in the lost heart, went to the will but the will was awry as the Santas, fit and jelly, went cocking their logs on every paste. They, so much the more disparate, went in like maniacs dispossesed as the Mugpoos, as loco as a republican, cocked every which way but through the laplights and cussed their ear goodbye.
The Santas, nervous, grow onto farce the Gawkers, fat and defiling, in a prim grin for a spit in the Granny, as old as two mitts herself, while the vanished, bald wowsers at the blessed, look to baulk lips for the next snogging. The Santas, mutterings to rue, will, you'd harp, give the smut-arsers a cock in the unmunchables.
The Coots, experienced in the black laugh, have astoundingly assimilated the Santas, who climbed down through the chinny; they, braising harps early, went to pisses when the Coots, as you always knew they widdle, turned the sheets up and went blousing away.
The Santas, feeling for their laugh, got brown out of the writer in the sequins skirter, after putting up quite a fright in the happening's kilter; the Coots, sentencing the impotence of the connex, maintained the rouge, applied the strippers and raped the beneficient's of it.
The Coots, after the mind broke, contained the mystery as they steamed a head when the Santas, scrunching their heads, put down the glances. The Santas, unreliable to stop what was opening before their very arse, rolled a lover for the Coots, who thinked them artily.
The Santas, for all hat, thought back late and have much to fall black on; the Coots have, once swore, flexed their missiles. They, all fours and intense porpoises, are the blasted blessed, while the Santas, fool of the pliable, are a shade to be extremely courteous of.
The Coots, artful yearners of a wake's rust, will have a late wake of shrill winks as the Santas, earing up for a mirth in the perm, must seat the Poos on their eyesores; they are hurt flavours to go down on a scorning hop, as the Coots, rusting up, wash and wade.
Comments (5)
Add Comments