First Quarter: the Winners managed to manage a massive margin in a period of growth not forecast by even the most optimistic creditors, which transferred a deficit to the Losers as the philosophy generating their going forward, across the board, created the pursuit of individual gain, for a loss.
Second Quarter: pursuing more value to add to their interest, the Winners managed to enhance the position on the board they had managed in the previous period, which created more uncertainty for the Losers, as they went into the next recession with a deficit that required savage slashes.
Third Quarter: the Winners continued a trend of misdirecting their key actions in the face of their ultimate goals, which cost them another gain in a period they otherwise owned, and allowed the Losers, attempting to resolve their issues, to dupe the board into poor accounts of the state of play.
Fourth Quarter: boosting the size of the deficit they were managing marginally, the Winners resumed business after the last recession with the addition of more ascendancy on the board, which transferred incredible pressure to the credible accounts the Losers would try and manage going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners accounted for the control they managed with reports of the belief they're building, which is a fair reflection of the business going on inside their business, and was in marked contrast to the poor report the Losers managed of being "at a loss" to explain the very poor loss.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the gloom with the benefit of the welfare provided by the size and scope of the realistic target they managed to supply opportunity to, which the Losers had no viable option to limit, as they unearthed a future option going forward, and gave a good account.
Second Quarter: in a rapid slowing down, in a slippery climate, the Winners managed to acquit themselves adequately enough to sufficiently account for the Losers, which amounted to a sign of hope for them, as they managed to limit the impact the climate had on their business, overall.
Third Quarter: the Winners suffered a dramatic turnaround of their fortunes, as the deficit they had negotiated for the Losers became their sole property, going into the last recession, as the competition evened up the conditions for trading with bold initiatives they had stolen, going forward.
Fourth Quarter: owning a realistic target which doubled as a means of protecting the advantage, the Winners stole the margin which was the rightful property of the Losers, as they had struggled to generate opportunity for their future option going forward, which had gained them some credit, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to avoid the pressure of delivering accurate accounts for the poor figures they attracted to their performance, which merely intensified the scrutiny the Losers were placed under, as they struggled to maintain some credibilty in the stability of their unity.
First Quarter: the Winners assured their business a margin due to the interest they invested in managing an enterprising outlook, which they had lost during a massive crisis, and the Losers managed to return, due to the individualistic strategy they had manufactured as a means of going forward.
Second Quarter: surging with confidence in a period of severe improvement, the Winners secured a sizeable margin going into a deep recession, which generated alarm for the Losers, as they attempted to stimulate confidence in the long-term security of their management of the means.
Third Quarter: the Winners handed back much of its advantage in a period of savage contraction of the growth of the confidence they had been building, which the Losers had to take a significant percentage of the credit for, as their stimulating package of risky ventures managed a boom.
Fourth Quarter: continuing the accurate accounts on the board, the Winners held off on a depression as the competition continued to cut the margin, which the Losers, managing to slash their deficit, took an interest in acquiring, if not the outcome they had deemed an accurate assessment.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners assessed their outcome as a product of the "accountable" values instilled in their business, and the "work ethic" of the new addition to its ranks, as the Losers attempted to transfer responsibility to the competition, which they couldn't manage, in the final analysis.
First Quarter: the Winners banked on their old firm delivering them an absolute advantage, which proved to be a capital idea as they gained a margin after falling into deficit, which the Losers had assisted in the making of, despite the business of their organisation, through the inequality of class.
Second Quarter: consolidating an advantage with added value, the Winners managed to align the board with their enterprise, which virtually guaranteed confidence, as the Losers, struggling with the management of class, produced a second consecutive quarter going into the big break.
Third Quarter: the Winners compounded their gains, despite managing to measure the means with their ultimate goals with a rate of returns that minimised their break, which the Losers managed to make marginally more taxing than it had been in the last recession, and produced the risk of a big loss.
Fourth Quarter: for a second consecutive quarter after the last serious recession, the Winners managed another marginal gain, which added value to the break they had managed in the previous two quarters, as the Losers, adhering to the model business plan they had devised, suffered a depression.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners urged caution from investors willing to pay them out for their previous performances, reminding creditors that the value of an advantage delivers that option, which generated a serious admission from the Losers that "we were really poor", and was a good account.
First Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficiency of assets in the current climate by managing to squander, going forward, the comparative advantage of the situation, which managed to defer the transfer of credit, acquired through the discipline of their organisation, to the Winners, until now.
Second Quarter: the grim assessments of the board compounded the stagnant productivity of the Losers with the liabilty of their excessive individualism, which was accelerated by the structured industry of the Winners delivering a productive return from the manufacture of opportunity.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to stall the advancing excess of the competition through the manageable acquisition of opportunity and no small amount of fortune, as the Winners negotiated the expected surge in the competition, which was managed securely by the business of their discipline.
Fourth Quarter: the poverty of their account stimulated the Losers sufficiently to manage only the smallest of losses for a substantial overall deficit, which was an indication of the effect that two consecutive quarters of massive gains on the board, aligned to performance, delivered the Winners, initially.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers failed to supply analysts with credible accounts of their shortfall through the excessive attribution of credit to their competition, which served as an accurate account of the discrepancy between them and the Winners, who managed to acquit their business accurately.
First Quarter: the Losers struggled to manufacture industry from their opportunity because, analysts observed their enterprise to be in short supply, and the Losers' control of the environment around the competition, which coexisted as the strategy to take their own business forward.
Second Quarter: employing a greater demand for industry as the strategy to get back in the game, the Losers managed to dupe analysts into giving them a forecasted advantage, which the Winners struggled to maintain, despite appearing, to some observers, to have had the initiative stolen by competitors.
Third Quarter: the Losers struggled to free up their key assets, despite the additional room in the economy that allowed those in control of the property more time for decision-making, which was directly attributable to the safe-guards the Winners employed to minimise the competition.
Fourth Quarter: the poor execution of decision-makers and the critical inaccuracies, generally, conspired to rob the Losers of the absolute advantage, which was acquired by the Winners through the radical restructuring of their strategy going forward, by way of identifying targets further afield.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers generated excessive criticism of their resources and forecast significant change, if the perceived industrial stagnation continued, which failed to give credit to the Losers, who labelled their "strategic analyst" as the reason they could exploit their competitor's interests.
First Quarter: the Losers slashed the deficit they had acquired through toxic assets by a wait-and-see approach which alowed them to make credible entries and secure some interest which had been the exclusive property of the Winners, who failed to consolidate on their advantage secured through capitalising on their co-operative competition.
Second Quarter: through the massive inequality of class, the Losers managed to quadruple their deficit which sent them into the recession considering the propect of a depression which was generated by the Winners consolidaing the ownership of the means to accelerate the anxiety of their competitors organsation, which rolled over.
Third Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficit from the recession by making concessions to their competitors on the board despite registering meagre returns for their industry which served to stimulate the Winners into consolidating their advantage after the recession and returning some confidence, to their credit, to their creditors.
Fourth Quarter: managing to make their competitors pay for their laissez-faire practices, the Losers secured some enterprise from their workers and the excessive turnover of the board, which had a minor impact on the overall margin the Winners had acquired because the individuals in their organisation managed competently.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the generated loss to the decision-making of those with ownership of the means of production, and attempted to defraud creditors into buying that they're growing, despite the Winners generating the gain through negotiating an improved peformance from their sustainable targets and adversity-overcoming.
First Quarter: the Winners utilised a host of factors, not least their own enterprise, to gain a comparative advantage that would, with added value, deliver returns of absolute advantage. The Losers failed to invest in industry and instead put value into their own individual greed at the expense of the manufacture of any lucrative share.
Second Quarter: capitalising on their endeavour, the Winners duplicated their earlier industry and managed to account for an early surge from their competitors which they met with an increase in output. A backlash during a minor recession caused the Losers to increase their individualistic aims but the ultimate failure of their partnership remained.
Third Quarter: the Winners met their competitors' individualism with a collective venture that was offset by the class in their structure delivering good performances at opportune times. The Losers delivered some of the goods the class in their structure promised to observers but their enterprise was not matched by their declining industry.
Fourth Quarter: any massive increases of productivity failed to arise as the Winners' margin suffered only a slight gain, which, in the over-all scheme, amounted to an injection of confidence. In the climate, the Losers' fortune was enhanced by their competitors' lack of productivity as the board registered a small loss for a huge deficit, over-all.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners gained credit from their interest in industry and co-operation and took the massive margin to add value to their confidence after a difficult period. The Losers were forced to account for their individualism and excessive interest in their own value which they failed to sell to analysts, but which many observers bought.
First Quarter: the Losers' shortage of enterprise, which was compounded by a lack of interest and vision, gave observers reason to manage their credit with severe caution. The Winners took moderate risks that placed undue pressure on their competitor's unsustainable running of their business and forced analysts to give them credit for the gain.
Second Quarter: taking advantage of the low interest of their competitors, the Losers increased productivity in the initial exchanges with their systemised operations. The Winners exploited their low overheads and unrealistic targets during a contraction of their margin and managed to regain their significant advantage by minimising productivity.
Third Quarter: the Losers capitalised on the recession by increasing their investment in industry to manage their deficit despite the lack of vision, ingenuity and rampant excess. The Winners lent a small fortune to the uncertainty of their creditors with a loss of interest in their enterprising schemes and the surge in their competitor's gain.
Fourth Quarter: many observers gave the Losers credit for their decline in productivity at the board-level which increased the demand for greater output from their targets. The Winners gave their creditors continued confidence with the advantages their shared intrerest in primarily individualistic goals sought to gain, and did gain.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers faced questions about their trading in insecure targets and attributed their loss to the loss of confidence and lack of options, which creditors bought. The Winners gave their creditors a performance that added value to the perception of future gains, which amounts to a loss, after the real value is factored in.
The Poor, in my inestimable exclamations, give themselves a shit in the arm with a big grin over the Cankers, bitching as they slip themselves a fatty, who brew a shit at a top feel.
The Cankers, remembering their millstone-sphincter, racked intestines around the protest as the Poor, swarthy in the pickets and praying like many lairs, got the thing and pashed it up.
They, famished, offed their yearn with their breasts heaving and their pulverisers thrusting over the Cankers, who, mushed it, dug ther own grieve - it was as gravy as, sweet rants.
The Cankers, prattling to sting their grin, have, nuffers, had another good seasick plopper - which can't be said for the Poor, who've slopped baldly after fooling the affects of the granny.
They'll be a hindful, in their arse, for all crumblers next time around the shun - we, shrill, see; shinier than hat, the Cankers go to the hobo-shitter to greet the Swines for saddening deaf.
In the spit of Post-mortemism, I bring you this exclusive forced-hand repartee: the Poor, wanting wretches but heaving nuns, get a grope on the Emos, and that's a real mirthful!
Their teets chattering like braisers, their arses falling out of their heads, they went to the wally but the wally was wry, and so, the Poor, wit like the drowning poor, sunk the bots in, shirtkickers.
Their bots, muddy as a piddle on a tart road, erred like elle but, didn't we just leave it? no biddy knows, but for the Emos, damned and art, a lass like it is fart from what they would grieve.
It's spit on for their ear, as it's been one doleful grin after a nutter and mystery for the fans, which, fannily a sniff, is more or lass, the sane for the Poor, who've gone from bored to this.
The Cankers, always up for a spit and perish, give the Poor, short on groins, a real headwank; while the Emos will be praying for bride when the Ticklers blend them over, juts for fin.
When the read, read ribbing goes pop, pop dribbling, the Madpiss blurt out of the box as the Poor, scarred for laugh, try like helium to get back - Atlas, no dias, it's not to be.
Early in the lassed squirter, trialling something shaking, the Poor lurched back into congestion only for the Piss to come trickling hard in the last leg of the fatal squirter and get the pants.
They were frightfully theirs - they had all the hellomarks of a Piss factory: trickling and plopping their way over the Poor: mouths agape reading for a goaded shooer.
Sssssshooooooooo, their ear: one miser dribbling down his front, is all moist: a lover; the Piss have, their shit in odour, a chants growing for a tilt at the dribbling chins: lick it.
The Swines, rippling bodily, don't like the Piss: accept to rile around in the nude: hippy daze; the Poor, still licking for wanks, get as good a chin as any when they need the Emos.
Is there any wheezing why I'm so re-ejected? - said the Booblickers to the Poor upon the noose that they, the meatiest, heave their felt on their threat; to which the Poor, likening in wretches, go: I don't get it!
It's the tolling fucked, that the Booblickers, go on to say: How do you lick this on for spies?, as they presided to kick their growning eyes. As they did so, the Poor, fiddling about in the dork, trapped and felt, go.
The Boobs, apply pleasure to the bawling currier, snatch up their pinkest wink for sewing oars and so say all of us. The Poor, fooled the weariest I've seen, and undying their louses prayed like bubbles for some relife.
So it has been for their ear, but it may not hinge so on the necks, say those in the nose who also demean the stinkstress of the Boobluggers, who, are, unenviably shrill, in the ruse for a spit in the fatal hat.
The Cankers, in the steaming bit, shall grieve for them money-tears and smack on the eyes: shampoo defining for both; while the Poor mate the Mugpiss, in a piddle for who has the rate to whore the prick and wit stirrups.
Make me rethank this howling lot! The Santas, flaying eyes in the noughties' cry, pinched the pants from the logs of the grinning Poor, lamington another crass lass.
Tarring like bloggery with a splotch of disparate muttons, they wed at the warts passable tombs, as the Santas, snuggling in the foreplace, put thongs in their shockings.
They swept the hearse with more pants then they startled wits, as the Poor, pointless on money, wept; the grind, fool of hype, necked the weak and that's the Poor.
Their reason, down the shit and not becoming pricks, is an agnostic's cries: hard of herring; the Santas, fit and lifting, have a cold shit at the top fart: unthankably.
They'll need to be on card with the Madpiles, as they've heard a black weep; the Poor, get a chump's red gumption with a chin's shit at the eye-defiling Booblickers.
Add Comments
Comments (2)