First Quarter: the Losers guaranteed their organisation a break in the form of a recession, after a period in which they managed to have analysts forecast a savage loss, and was, in large part, due to the Winners and the industry they managed to distribute, as they went forward with a target in mind.
Second Quarter: slashing the deficit, the Losers looked the goods for the period as they managed to capitalise on the limited entries their business managed on their account, which generated a sudden tremor in the solid business of maintaining confidence the Winners have built up over a period of time.
Third Quarter: the Losers shocked observers with a sudden and sustained turnaround, delivering two consecutive quarters of positive figures going into the last recession, which had the Winners, at a loss, managing a deficit of their own, and the option of a gloomy result forecast by poor analysts.
Fourth Quarter: suffering a savage stagnation, the Losers managed to acquit themselves as a potentially sound investment for the future despite the loss, which the Winners owned after surging to a position on the board they are accustomed to, in a productive period for solid business.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers, managing to remain calm despite the strong showing, delivered an account which managed to convey the general optimism of their outlook, and contrasted sharply with the general mood of a slump the Winners are experiencing, as their confidence threatens their output.
First Quarter: the Winners struggled to manage viable levels of industry which generated a manageable deficit as the prospects of their targets being reached dwindled, which was due to the Losers costly mismanagement of processing opportunity into alignment with the board, and poor fortune.
Second Quarter: reaching their targets with great frequency through the abandonment of property gains for gains in real estate, the Winners managed a margin, which guaranteed the Losers a crisis in the midst of a period of a serious recession, and a possible restructuring of resources, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Winners, denied ownership of the means going forward, again manufactured a gain from limited opportunity after the recession abated, resulting in another period of intense uncertainty for the Losers, as they managed to hold the means for the majority, despite the board's report.
Fourth Quarter: a flurry of activity at board-level enhanced the position of the Winners as they increased the margin they had been working on, and boosted their figures over their real value, which summarises the account the Losers gave of their business in the final analysis: at all costs, panic in a crisis.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to avoid pay outs due to the savage enterprise of their old firm, "that was just the commitment that was showed among the group", which managed to balance the account of the Losers: "We didn't hit our targets, and also our decision-making was poor."
First Quarter: the Losers managed their surplus of confidence with a deficit recorded at board-level, which severely restricted the operations of the business of giving a good account, as the Winners negotiated the impact of a previously empty account with a productive period, overall.
Second Quarter: compromised by a savage conflict between their industry and targets, the Losers aligned their inaccurate measures with a second consecutive quarter, which the Winners had to take credit for going into a major recession with a massive deficit for the competition, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to break even after being given a major break, which hindered their prospects for gaining the position on the board they sought, as the Winners managed to experience a stagnant period in the venture they undertook to attain solid gains, quarter by quarter.
Fourth Quarter: the conditions for business improved markedly, the Losers managed to give a good account of the sort of business they are liable to manage, going forward, which benefited the Winners, as they posted another gain on the board, which was aligned to the performance managed.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to avoid giving credible accounts for the position they managed, due to the widespread fraud prevalent in the industry in these tough times, which contrasted sharply with the Winners' accounting practices of managing their reports of results poorly, overall.
First Quarter: the Winners maximised the advantage they had managed through the minimisation of the costly business of negotiating the competition, as the Losers maximised their disadvantage, in the gloomy conditions, with excessive mismanagement of what opportunity they could manage.
Second Quarter: as the conditions met the forecasts, the Winners generated an excessive margin from operating their business of maintaining control of their monopoly, which generated the prospect of a depression for the Losers, after they experienced two consecutive quarters of negativity.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to consolidate their advantage in the conditions, and generated a significant shortfall of interest from neutral observers, which the Losers, struggling to generate opportunity for the small percentage of class in their structure, paid for, going backwards.
Fourth Quarter: as the gloom generated liquidity in the climate, the Winners continued their miserly approach to the competition and benefitted from a return to productivty, as the Losers produced an account of their organisation, which generated a severe depression for creditors and observers.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attempted to defraud analysts into investing excessive interest in credit for their result to resources they had inherited, which paid small credit to the effective business the Losers manufactured in engineeering an outlook of better returns, going forward with optimism.
First Quarter: the Losers compounded the interest of observers by recording a substantial share of the board's turnover with their productive performance, which aligned the Winners with their past performances, and provided creditors with nothing in the way of confidence going forward.
Second Quarter: defrauding observers into aligning their performance with an absolute advantage, the Losers' industry initiated a decline that would provide observers with a loss of interest, which was directly attributable to the increase in productivity provided on the board of the Winners.
Third Quarter: the Losers' decline, aligned by analysts to the pressure of their competitive environment, was not sufficiently steep enough to lose them control of the board, which the Winners continued to turnover through the accountability of their industry, and the manufacture of oppourtunity.
Fourth Quarter: in the final analysis, the Losers managed to oversee the poor management of their margin to the point of complete collapse, which was significantly aided by the Winners' management of their property going forward, and the distribution of productivity across the board, on the board.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the board's result to their failure to "capitalise on our opportunities", and the decline their industry experienced due to the slow-down, which provided the Winners with the opportunity their creditors sought to "capitalise where we didn’t in the first quarter”.
First Quarter: the Losers managed to register poor returns at the board-level in difficult conditions as slippery creditors passed themselves off as analysts in a bid to defraud observers, who managed to take stock of the account given of the Winners' handling of the environment and exploitation of their targets going forward with capacious economy.
Second Quarter: a loss of fortune generated a false attribution of a decline from creditors after the Losers managed to simulate a doubling of their deficit through their deteriorating capital which failed to account for the credit due to the Winners, who managed to free up their capital and, in the climate, manufactured excellent rewards for their work.
Third Quarter: the Losers negotiated the period following the major recession through their steady output and their committment to their organisation, which creditors endeavoured to conceal and supplied the Winners with no account for their dwindling margin, except for their continuing industry and their competitors' inaccurate measures.
Fourth Quarter: slippery creditors supplied observers with a meagre account of the Losers ineptitude in registering productivity on the board and compromised their legitimacy which was also distributed to the Winners, who added a small gain to their overall margin which analysts had to attribute to their legitimate targets and accuracy with the means.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempts to divert a depression caused by their declining industry were given added value by creditors passing fraudulent accounts off as legitimate and denying analysts any raw material with which to invest interest in the Winners, except for speculations going forward, which reinforced the presence of slippery accounts.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated a period of early prosperity through responsible enterprise recorded on the board, which failed to deter creditors' interest. The Losers manufactured sustainable levels of productivity through a focus on targets managed by their industry, and gained the advantage of a minor figure on the board.
Second Quarter: in a rapidly expanding distribution of manufacture, the Winners delivered a significant turn-around to their creditors with the board recording a rapid turnover. The small gain the Losers had manufactured became a massive deficit that required an urgent injection of industry and a large measure of fortune.
Third Quarter: the Winners turned around after the major recession and observed their competitors increase their industry as their own creditors manufactured a reliance on optimism. The Losers used the advantage delivered to them by a large measure of fortune to reduce their deficit to manageable levels through their focus on targets.
Fourth Quarter: in a period of heavy trading, the Winners resumed their manufacturing at the board-level through the effciency of their targets and a heavy reliance on stimulating observers. In a foreign environment, the Losers managed to decrease their competitors margin by slashing their own deficit but still took away a small loss.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners eradicated records that gave creditors losses, and to a certain extent lent themselves credit through their improved organisation. The Losers failure to capitalise on their opportunity and fortune with the efficient ownership of the means of production delivered analysts a much needed boost.
First Quarter: the Winners posted a set of numbers that indicated that their uncertainty in the current climate created the conditions that made it difficult for them to open their account. The Losers achieved much better numbers than expected due to the performance of their efficient structure which enabled them to more than hit their targets.
Second Quarter: continuing their lack of productivity at the board level, the Winners discovered enough enterprise in developing resources which enabled them to break even. The Losers also registered the same result after the acquisition of a significant margin which they had to relinquish after a sudden downturn in their fortunes.
Third Quarter: booming confidence and a dramatic turn-around in productivity combined to give the Winners the leading figures they required to succeed at board level. Any gains the Losers had made were wiped off with the losses they suffered in a climate that made it difficult to hit targets and maintain their hold on their possessions.
Fourth Quarter: despite their unsustainable organisation and unable to meet their goals, the Winners secured a valuable gain after negotiating to maintain a slight margin. Whatever deficit they had to negotiate and in unfavourable conditions for their industry, the Losers managed to gain confidence in their productivity, in the balance.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners showed the benefits of capitalising on opportunity and keeping their costs to a minimum when their competitors experience a surge in confidence. The Losers enhanced their standing in the industry as lacking in the resources to do the business when their competitors get the running of their business right.
The Swines, insulating to the arse, have wormed to the ask of balding for the final suction with a noisy wank over the Loins, who are piddling a taste to their deported pumpkin: tata!
Little did the Loins know, but they, praying for nut-rings, had their meathocks on the cleaver that sent the pimpcan picking, as the Swines, laughless and cold-bloodied, sunk their robots in.
The Swines, always culpable of rinsing, went in for the ovary and pimped it into their attic, as the Loins, shafted arse-butter, stood on the straight corner and perfumed a few tracks, for cold gash.
Small windows that their ear has been defiled by such a lack of hurt, and many bad butterings, where the Swines, no lass erotic, have also been lip and down but not that bald, in the front-half.
They'll hoist the Cankers in a gut-throat grin to be watched by many fannies, arsewear for dogs! The Loins, a new pimpcon at the home, lick to necked ears with a sense of doped eyes: a pair.
Cake-sucker, the Boobies, so Jungian and so-so sweaty, nipple in the bed the Loins' venal hate-chants with a comb-from-behind-the-garters wink, to the tune of one's trite cake, sickos.
The Loins, whoring a big groin on their faeces at the venal blog, went to slap in the lust squirter, which alluded the Boobs, a lewd and round, a lick at sex on the trot and a wanking margarine.
A smell of a sweaty-factory was ever so-so what, the Boobies, hoarding the lippy-hind, threw their ums in the hair, as the feeling - the Loins - threw their knackers to the grind, mater-fingers.
The lass smells the end of their ear, a yearn that has been a belt of a velour - and that's rarely bald; while the Boobies, in the shunt for a bath in the hate, have heard a cold ear, booby.
Cake-broth, the Gawkers, arse like fire, will be hopping to sinned them plucking with a nibbly arse; whorearses, the Loins will shop the Swines into their complain with a bald curse of the dribbles.
On a slippery Jewry one, the Liars, doing it throwing their tooth, wish the Pullers, pulling the airs out, a hampered bidding, hand them their godpiece and lick them in the drowning Jews!
Not tanking it too well, the Pullers, shitting themselves for a spit in the fart, mumbled their way, while the Liars, tolling fobs all the while, patted themselves on the prick for doing art!
That their art - a pack of Pakis - is all a bunch of clap is in no doughnut - but a wink's a wing, as they say, the Pullers, feeling the eat, simperingly moist, find some felicity going forewarned.
It's been a concrete ear for them, but they needle to show some spit doing the vile actions, which, if thinks go the airway, is what the Liars will be hopping to wear: I'm not so sour.
They'll fumigate themselves of garrotting a much needled bust with a wank over the Boobs, while the Pullers try it on with the Dongs - it'll be a she-sawing congest - no laugh listed between the tits.
By the light of the salivary moon, but in bland dayloiter, the Gawkers whistled the Loins to the grind and then put their thing in their mother, before a little bit of fast-pumping.
They were shorn the door at their hoist's hammer away from Homer to which they had knitting to show, whereas the Gawkers, the ordeal's hosts, grinned over the top.
Another big bag of coals from their baddy in the front shaft prayed a big fart in the margarine, because aside from that the Loins were just as clap as could be passable.
Their yearn, wince so passionfruit, is newly wanging about their uncles but they're still a shit at the hate, while the Gawks, top tree furnishers can get shot for their complain.
The Tickers, shrill-dangerous, will be anything but curtains after the Gawks have sheen to them, while the Loins are minties to give the Dullblogs a shedache, despite hysteria.
Drip me in butter and fray me, deeply. The Cankers, blogger me dead, tickled the chocolates over the Loins in a very crass snatch. It could have coined the ether way.
The Loins, rake my dread, are stuttering at these girdles as the Cankers, all lover like a wash, have stunk a fuel together and lick stillettos for a shit at the top fowl.
You have to harangue it to them; the chinpony spit is all laugh and licking! The Loins, no louses in the spit deportment, are needling their eyes for a wink. Harry, up!
Their yearn, slowly subsidising, is fast growing down the gargler but all is not listed. The Cankers, set for a spell, are finding their fiat a bit to hourly for my licking.
They toggle the Dullblogs at a loping punt and are a flavoured to whinge, sourly; the Loins, musky, stand a giants when they piddle the Gawkers: new easybleats.
Fantastical as an ex-seamstress! The Togglers, lock the taggers on fold, punched the pants from a said and told Loins artfart. Why, oh why, did the Loins fake this one cap!
It all tinkled pates in the blank of a nay. The last wrestle went and they licked up to the scared bard and snored the Taggers chimping for chair after varnishing fausts.
The Taggers, you have to stray, are in the muddle of a burping pouch. They, simperingly moist, cope gowning, as the Loins cope shirking into blue-tent indivisibilty, ay?
Their ear is hanging by a throat but still have a muff to snicker into the fatal hate, where the Togglers, clocking over the pike, mush make it. It's new or nuffer, I'd say sow.
The Clits, hard to fan at the beast, will have to cope a noir art if they're to tamper them, as the Loins, itching with the Cankers, know that a wink is a mush for their hype.
Add Comments
Comments (4)