Round 7, 2009, Port Adelaide lost to North Melbourne
First Quarter: the Winners assured their business a margin due to the interest they invested in managing an enterprising outlook, which they had lost during a massive crisis, and the Losers managed to return, due to the individualistic strategy they had manufactured as a means of going forward.
Second Quarter: surging with confidence in a period of severe improvement, the Winners secured a sizeable margin going into a deep recession, which generated alarm for the Losers, as they attempted to stimulate confidence in the long-term security of their management of the means.
Third Quarter: the Winners handed back much of its advantage in a period of savage contraction of the growth of the confidence they had been building, which the Losers had to take a significant percentage of the credit for, as their stimulating package of risky ventures managed a boom.
Fourth Quarter: continuing the accurate accounts on the board, the Winners held off on a depression as the competition continued to cut the margin, which the Losers, managing to slash their deficit, took an interest in acquiring, if not the outcome they had deemed an accurate assessment.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners assessed their outcome as a product of the "accountable" values instilled in their business, and the "work ethic" of the new addition to its ranks, as the Losers attempted to transfer responsibility to the competition, which they couldn't manage, in the final analysis.
Second Quarter: surging with confidence in a period of severe improvement, the Winners secured a sizeable margin going into a deep recession, which generated alarm for the Losers, as they attempted to stimulate confidence in the long-term security of their management of the means.
Third Quarter: the Winners handed back much of its advantage in a period of savage contraction of the growth of the confidence they had been building, which the Losers had to take a significant percentage of the credit for, as their stimulating package of risky ventures managed a boom.
Fourth Quarter: continuing the accurate accounts on the board, the Winners held off on a depression as the competition continued to cut the margin, which the Losers, managing to slash their deficit, took an interest in acquiring, if not the outcome they had deemed an accurate assessment.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners assessed their outcome as a product of the "accountable" values instilled in their business, and the "work ethic" of the new addition to its ranks, as the Losers attempted to transfer responsibility to the competition, which they couldn't manage, in the final analysis.
 Add Comments
|
|
