First Quarter: the Winners generated a severe shortage of industry in the energy sector, which created a deficit across the board as they managed a perception of uncertainty, and allowed the Losers, managing rising levels of confidence, to get the running of their business aligned to their practices.
Second Quarter: slashing the deficit, the Winners went into the upcoming recession with a savage surge in the uncertainty they managed to inflate for the Losers, which was due to the rapidly contracting margin and a massive increase in output that generated richer supplies, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Winners guaranteed their organisation an opportunity to manage the control of the board with a solid quarter which netted them a turnaround in the deficit, which created a nasty surge in uncertainty for the Losers, as they attempted to manage a perception of resolute business.
Fourth Quarter: breaking even for the period, the Winners managed enough confidence to hold on to their nervous control of the board to secure the outcome, which the Losers assisted with, as they consolidated the perception that their uneven individualism is on the excessive side, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners were credited with the turnaround of a deficit by the industry, after banking on the ineptitude of the competition through "some real class" divisions, as the Losers, banking on a perception of poor fortune, managed an account which didn't hike any real rate of interest.
First Quarter: the Winners attracted the interest of observers despite what the board maintained, and managed to generate a majority of the share of the board's activity, which the Losers had attempted to minimise as they struggled to create interest from their limited share of the means.
Second Quarter: guaranteed a position on the board worth their organisation, the Winners managed their business going into a recession with great expertise, which caused the Losers to experience pain going forward as they struggled to find any class going forward, as the break extended.
Third Quarter: the Winners, sluggish after the recession, struggled to add valuable points to their strategy of unrelenting industry in a structured arrangement within the industry, which the Losers managed some credit from, as they managed to stall the competition, across the board.
Fourth Quarter: secure in the advantage their strategy had managed, the Winners struggled, under the expectations of gloom, to add unsustainable growth to a certain percentage, which the Losers lost a large chunk of, in the final analysis, as their deficit blew out late in the piece, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to distribute credit for the outcome evenly going forward, owing to the substantive quality of the work their key sectors managed, which the Losers attempted to match with positive reports of the new resources they're developing to win property disputes.
First Quarter: the Winners assured their business a margin due to the interest they invested in managing an enterprising outlook, which they had lost during a massive crisis, and the Losers managed to return, due to the individualistic strategy they had manufactured as a means of going forward.
Second Quarter: surging with confidence in a period of severe improvement, the Winners secured a sizeable margin going into a deep recession, which generated alarm for the Losers, as they attempted to stimulate confidence in the long-term security of their management of the means.
Third Quarter: the Winners handed back much of its advantage in a period of savage contraction of the growth of the confidence they had been building, which the Losers had to take a significant percentage of the credit for, as their stimulating package of risky ventures managed a boom.
Fourth Quarter: continuing the accurate accounts on the board, the Winners held off on a depression as the competition continued to cut the margin, which the Losers, managing to slash their deficit, took an interest in acquiring, if not the outcome they had deemed an accurate assessment.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners assessed their outcome as a product of the "accountable" values instilled in their business, and the "work ethic" of the new addition to its ranks, as the Losers attempted to transfer responsibility to the competition, which they couldn't manage, in the final analysis.
First Quarter: the Losers rallied in late trading after managing to negotiate the impact of the damaging business of the competition, and their own crisis and uncertainty, as the Winners, securing valuable dividends on the board for their enterprise and co-operative business, managed a gain.
Second Quarter: adding value to the assessment of a decline, the Losers paid the price for the loss of class in their structure, and managed a second consecutive quarter going in to the major recession, as the Winners manufactured massive confidence, from owning the competition.
Third Quarter: the Losers generated another negative gain through the inequalities they met in the competition, despite managing to negate the severity going into the last recession, as the Winners delivered creditors, selling themselves as analysts, a massive surge in pay outs for their reports.
Fourth Quarter: adding to their deficit with a savage depression, the Losers turned around after the last recession by delivering observers a reason to invest in some other business, as the Winners managed to create inequality at board-level, which was aligned to class, across the board.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers "couldn't question our endeavour", despite having serious misgivings about their management of what property they managed to secure, as the Winners called on legislators to allow regulations that would allow for better management of the impact of liabilities and damages.
First Quarter: the Losers met expectations of an absolute advantage, in early trading, through the gain of a margin, which they acquired at the expense of the Winners, as they endeavoured to slash the deficit they had managed after continuing the gloomy forecasts predicted for their business.
Second Quarter: experiencing a severe downturn in their industry, the Losers headed towards the major recession with a deficit which threatened to last until the close, and delivered the Winners a boost to their struggling confidence, and was aligned to a surge very few observers bargained on.
Third Quarter: the Losers, in the absence of their captain of industry, delivered creditors a deflating forecast of the class in their structure and lack of future options, which pays no credit to the Winners, who negotiated the period following the recession with a distinct margin, from booming business.
Fourth Quarter: inaccurate measures and dwindling supplies of confidence manufactured the second consecutive quarter of negative growth in the Losers' deficit, as the Winners negotiated the margin they had worked hard to accrue, and, going forward, made confidence an acquisition to bank on.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempted to generate positive accounts of their industry, despite crediting a failure to capitalise on "opportunity" for their inequalities at board-level, as the Winners negotiated the terms with a slippery account of their position, in terms of the people in their business.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the business of acquiring a significant share of the meagre turnover analysts observed transpiring on the board, and compounded it with the minimisation of the Losers' efficiency at aligning the means of production with the most manageable of targets.
Second Quarter: capitalising on the oppourtunity afforded them, the Winners managed to continue the slow returns of the board, which served to supply the Losers' creditors with the probability of a depression resulting from the overall interest lost by analysts during the impending recession.
Third Quarter: the Winners, in one single quarter, managed to double the size and scope of the margin they had acquired over two consecutive quarters, which was due to the Losers' incompetence at the board level, aligned to the performance of their distributions and property management.
Fourth Quarter: delivering the overall gain that creditors required to maintain interest, the Winners acquired their margin despite the dwindling turnover of their board, and the Losers management of the surge in confidence produced by the enterprise of their industry, and poorly managed actions.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast the margin the people in their organisation managed would generate a significant growth in confidence in their business, which reversed the trend the Losers had managed in building interest, which they admitted was "pretty costly" in the overall scheme.
First Quarter: the Winners secured a marginal advantage through the competent management of their reachable targets and the effective employment of their business, which was negotiated in early trading by the Losers who employed an unsustainable strategy going forward and gained a deficit.
Second Quarter: reaching their targets through the outlook that their targets can manage, the Winners registered a significant gain and went into the gloom of a recession with an advantage over the Losers, who struggled to sustain their output as their effectiveness going forward was minimised.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated the uncertainty of the recession by focussing on their strategy and managed to increase their margin following early signs from the Losers of resurgent productivity from radical restructuring netting dividends, leading some observers to return with interest.
Fourth Quarter: driven by optimism, manufactured with confidence, the Winners controlled the means of production and accounted for their competition through measures that generated more gains, which compounded the loss the Losers failed to avert through their targetless organisation.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the massive margin they acquired to the contribution generated from the management of their resources at the highest level, which measured against the Losers' failure to manage the crisis they created through the ownership of a classless structure.
First Quarter: the Losers managed the difficult conditions for sustainable growth poorly and struggled to manufacture a realistic target with a reliance on owning the means to produce zero gains. The Winners made use of viable strategy from their manageable targets to post sufficient return for their hard business in the property disputes.
Second Quarter: with the climate appearing to be rapidly worsening, the Losers negotiated their competitors' resilient strategy to do some business that delivered moderate gains. Benefitting from lucrative partnerships, the Winners managed to maintain their advantage despite slipping back on their earlier promise of a massive margin.
Third Quarter: the Losers earned themselves a narrow loss for the quarter after costing themselves earlier losses which they managed to diminish with a late flurry. The Winners managed to turn the cessation of the recession into immediate gains that they were forced to hand back after being held to account on the board, by their competitors.
Fourth Quarter: continuing their pressure on the board, the Losers slashed the deficit and had many observers turning to analysts for advice until their industry failed to produce the goods. Turning around the trend, the Winners added interest to the value of creditors' claims with the manufacture of goals registered at board-level through good business.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers delivered a result that they attributed to their costly investment in new ventures, which ultimately failed to produce any interest from observers. The Winners admitted that their gain in a difficult climate was a much needed boost to their investment in accounting for their competitors' business with solid business practices.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated instability in a period of uncertainty through the responsible management of their organisation and a committment to accountability. The Losers managed to post the loss of a gain by breaking even after capitalising on their fortune through industry and the expoloitation of their opportunity.
Second Quarter: after trading had finished, the Winners made a marginal gain that was reflected on the board by the inequality of their relations in productivity. What gains the Losers had made were turned into losses after the rate of exchange became too much for their tired industry and lack of resources, as forecast.
Third Quarter: continuing a predictable trend, the Winners alienated analysts with their systematic and rigid lack of enterprising individualism for the sake of small gains on the board. What enterprise and vision the Losers' classless structure presented was more than balanced by their lack of realistic targets and, overheads.
Fourth Quarter: the Winners continued their consistent output with a productive performance at board level and the stalling of the growth of their competitors. The Losers experienced the slowing down of capital, as most analysts expected of industry in the down-turn, and left creditors with a loss, as forecast.
Fifth Quarter: the flexible exploitation of their comparative disadvantage gave the Winners the margin they needed to make the necessary modifications to their utilities. The Losers' comparative advantage was negligible once their lack of resources, vision at the top and class inequality had been factored into the package.
The Victors, cocked up the backside early, went to the squirter-time break beyond the Vanquished, unbeknownst to them that they were to be, as the masses, cuddling under the sheds, hurdled abuse and recommended going to the knackery.
The Vanquished, on the hollowed toff, fired back in before the mine broke with a bevvy of baddies shelling peace like it was just too arsey, as their bitter enemas, flashing like a fountain pen, lost a harem and a log in the butter farting.
The Victors, as the hostilities sussed, went into the rims, as the bricks fell and matyr scrambled, with a peanut to prove while their animus, infernally drivel, must have known that their shirts were growing to be brown off their barrackers.
The Vanquished, saw their road widdled away in just one squirt of the cloaca as the armed side, their eyeful animus, piled on a hole of ballets which the inveiglers, on foreign soil, relinquished the imposition they had thought so hard for.
The Victors, and their enmity, better perhaps, put up quite a fright in the lost blitz with both corking more pants than girls - the former, defending their road, mangled to arsehole an advantage recordless, as their enmity held their wounds and looked.
The Swines, filthy minimalists and patiently indelible, have found factory in illumination over the Cankers, arching a lover and falling out of flavour. The lass leaves a bald paste in the mouth, but nut if you're bollocks for the Swines: you're over the moo.
The Cankers, conversely if you rort for them, startled inversely to how they vanished, as the Swines, rorting around in the mind, felt behinds; it wasn't too lung before they, a meaty pinch of forgets, got it to tug ether, as the Cankers felt font and pissed doubt.
The Swines, in no drought whatsover, poked up these licks after the moaning duck and grinned a hatful of margarine that proved nut-rings; the Cankers, vanishing thirst, washed on as their coy prayers, not a triumvirate, went Muslim - faced Maccas and farted.
The Cankers, another afraid complain, have had a nap, a drown and a sleazing - they need to cut off the dud weeds; the Swines, heard to write toffily, are, to the amusement of money, stll olive and cocking - they've got their arse on their prayers: I feel font.
The Swines, tickling tits one whack at a time, will glib themselves every chin-sieve: the Dullblogs - not on friar, not one tit. Meanwhile, the Cankers, mouldy and shreaking, face a few heard forks: they're goaded in the regular sleazing but, clap in the last mouth.
The Poor, in my inestimable exclamations, give themselves a shit in the arm with a big grin over the Cankers, bitching as they slip themselves a fatty, who brew a shit at a top feel.
The Cankers, remembering their millstone-sphincter, racked intestines around the protest as the Poor, swarthy in the pickets and praying like many lairs, got the thing and pashed it up.
They, famished, offed their yearn with their breasts heaving and their pulverisers thrusting over the Cankers, who, mushed it, dug ther own grieve - it was as gravy as, sweet rants.
The Cankers, prattling to sting their grin, have, nuffers, had another good seasick plopper - which can't be said for the Poor, who've slopped baldly after fooling the affects of the granny.
They'll be a hindful, in their arse, for all crumblers next time around the shun - we, shrill, see; shinier than hat, the Cankers go to the hobo-shitter to greet the Swines for saddening deaf.
You'd think that I'd have chuckled in the towel by now, but when the Coots, a pinch of clits if ever there was, smooched the Cankers, arching for a belt, I could heartily say nothinks.
The Cankers, crept in there thanks to a phonepole in the scare, were brown out of the waiter in the turd squirter when the Coots, misters at browning out of the writer, went pang.
You'd have rung your arses out, in such a sentence of awww would you have been; but spell a thought for the Cankers - they had to pat up with the embellishment of such a lass.
The Cankers, about to crap off their shagging plopper, have tasted the Coots - lick no nutter, and that sees it all; because the Coots are defiantly the blessed on moist days.
You'd get a tellable schlock, were you to wash them take to the Costers with the lunghandle; while the Cankers tone up with their moldy animus: the Poor, in a paddle for the itches.
Not that it's any of your business, but the Cankers, properly the second blessed growing around, teeth the Boobs, properly nought, a hoarse lesson in the moaning of laugh.
Haha, they climbed out of the pox with greedy spit and a few girls on the beard, but the Cankers would have none of it: they warped the furore with 'em in the second squirter.
This makes sex on the trot and a real spastic shit at a double chin, as they rumped away with the grin, the Boobs, unwilling to get their hinds dirty, coughed up the bile, coffin.
It all smells cartons for their shit at the hate: that they've got so crass spanks perfumes for progress; the Cankers, to any same mind, heave their eyes on the big granny, darlings.
In a pope-opener, perhaps, they mate the Coots, who, as we all release, are the blessed; while the Loins, always climbing over the top, will give the Boobs a headache in the anus.
Comments (2)
Add Comments