Round 3, 2009, West Coast lost to Saint Kilda
First Quarter: the Winners managed the operation of their business through the discipline of their organisation and a structure which allowed their class to capitalise on the Losers' failure to develop an effective strategy going forward for managing the rapidly expanding deficit, after a period of early trading gave observers signs of interest in credit.
Second Quarter: aligning performance with figures, the Winners manufactured maximum productivity for their industry on the board through accurately measuring the means against their goals and the Losers' dwindling supply, which declined dramatically due to an excessive lack of accounting for their competitors' organisation and their own shortfall.
Third Quarter: the Winners' explosively accelerating gains were stalled by the major recession which allowed them to assess the collective benefits of their partnership which had the effect of allowing the Losers to increase the dividends from their mediocre performance, which had the net effect of delaying the decline of interest in some quarters.
Fourth Quarter: generating significant additional gains, the Winners profitted from their application to their organisation, which is built on the distribution of manufacture through reachable targets, which had the impact of driving the Losers into a near-depression after counting the cost of a structure made redundant through their lack of class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed their massive margin to the turnover their board generated through accurate measures and the pressure their organisation placed on the Losers, who supplied analysts with alarming reports about their dwindling industry which amounts to a loss of confidence in their organisation and sustainable expectations.
Second Quarter: aligning performance with figures, the Winners manufactured maximum productivity for their industry on the board through accurately measuring the means against their goals and the Losers' dwindling supply, which declined dramatically due to an excessive lack of accounting for their competitors' organisation and their own shortfall.
Third Quarter: the Winners' explosively accelerating gains were stalled by the major recession which allowed them to assess the collective benefits of their partnership which had the effect of allowing the Losers to increase the dividends from their mediocre performance, which had the net effect of delaying the decline of interest in some quarters.
Fourth Quarter: generating significant additional gains, the Winners profitted from their application to their organisation, which is built on the distribution of manufacture through reachable targets, which had the impact of driving the Losers into a near-depression after counting the cost of a structure made redundant through their lack of class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed their massive margin to the turnover their board generated through accurate measures and the pressure their organisation placed on the Losers, who supplied analysts with alarming reports about their dwindling industry which amounts to a loss of confidence in their organisation and sustainable expectations.
 Add Comments
|
|
