Round 7, 2009, Melbourne lost to West Coast
First Quarter: the Losers were denied the reward the account they managed to give deserved, which the climate demanded, and generated a manageable deficit, as the Winners, opening their account in the early part of trading, missed capitalising on a comparative advantage, for the rest.
Second Quarter: in a dramatic turnaround, the Winners slashed their confidence going into a deep recession, as the playing field opened up, allowing for more flowing business, which the Losers, generating a surge from the old firm, managed to prosper in, as the deficit deflated marginally.
Third Quarter: the Losers developed a margin from the deficit they had managed to acquire in the previous two quarters, which they relinquished as they looked to the board, which, as the last recession loomed, favoured the position the Winners had managed to align to their performance.
Fourth Quarter: surging with the loss of any expectation of an advantage, the Losers threatened to take control of the board, depsite the level of confidence disallowing such a takeover, which the Winners nervously maintained as they managed to lose confidence in their position, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers guaranteed themselves credit for the account they managed in assessing the outcome as the by-product of the value placed in risk-taking, which the Winners, despite the result on the table, are ill-equpped to invest in, as they transfer the means across the board.
Second Quarter: in a dramatic turnaround, the Winners slashed their confidence going into a deep recession, as the playing field opened up, allowing for more flowing business, which the Losers, generating a surge from the old firm, managed to prosper in, as the deficit deflated marginally.
Third Quarter: the Losers developed a margin from the deficit they had managed to acquire in the previous two quarters, which they relinquished as they looked to the board, which, as the last recession loomed, favoured the position the Winners had managed to align to their performance.
Fourth Quarter: surging with the loss of any expectation of an advantage, the Losers threatened to take control of the board, depsite the level of confidence disallowing such a takeover, which the Winners nervously maintained as they managed to lose confidence in their position, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers guaranteed themselves credit for the account they managed in assessing the outcome as the by-product of the value placed in risk-taking, which the Winners, despite the result on the table, are ill-equpped to invest in, as they transfer the means across the board.
 Add Comments
|
|
