Round 8, 2009, Melbourne lost to Western Bulldogs
First Quarter: the Losers utilised the plan they had been managing to effectively implement, which netted them a manageable margin going into the impending recession, as the Winners, stretched going forward due to the strain on the running of some of their business, managed a short-term loss.
Second Quarter: value-adding to the turnover they managed on the board, the Losers managed to be limited by the costly practices of accounting for the competition, which allowed the Winners sufficient room to negotiate a plan of attack going forward, which was feasible, and beneficial in the gloom.
Third Quarter: the Losers suffered a severe contraction of the turnover their business produced on the board, and manouvered their business into another credible loss, as the Winners, managing enough uncertainty to minimise the perception of a slump in their organisation, earned a gain.
Fourth Quarter: despite a late surge, the Losers cut the costs associated with a loss due to the industry they managed as a by-product of their strong values and integrity, which the Winners managed to negotiate as they put forward the proposal that their business going forward is poor, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers urged their workers to reach viable and manageable goals after the board had finalised its position, which the Winners assessed as "priceless" despite the potential damage the size of the margin inflicted on their fraudulent claims to leading the industry, in any department.
Second Quarter: value-adding to the turnover they managed on the board, the Losers managed to be limited by the costly practices of accounting for the competition, which allowed the Winners sufficient room to negotiate a plan of attack going forward, which was feasible, and beneficial in the gloom.
Third Quarter: the Losers suffered a severe contraction of the turnover their business produced on the board, and manouvered their business into another credible loss, as the Winners, managing enough uncertainty to minimise the perception of a slump in their organisation, earned a gain.
Fourth Quarter: despite a late surge, the Losers cut the costs associated with a loss due to the industry they managed as a by-product of their strong values and integrity, which the Winners managed to negotiate as they put forward the proposal that their business going forward is poor, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers urged their workers to reach viable and manageable goals after the board had finalised its position, which the Winners assessed as "priceless" despite the potential damage the size of the margin inflicted on their fraudulent claims to leading the industry, in any department.
 Add Comments
|
|
