First Quarter: the Winners, guaranteed certainty due to the abundance of class they could afford to manage, managed a period of excellent returns for their investments, which severely restricted the Losers, managing to limit panic in a continuing crisis, in their bid to offset their limited assets.
Second Quarter: sustaining the option of a massive boost to their position at the table, the Winners went into the recession on the back of two consecutive quarters which the Losers, experiencing a steady increase in the deficit they were managing, managed to add a depression to in a slump.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated the return to business after the break the recession afforded them with a proportionally similar output, despite the extra costs which the Losers taxed them, as they managed to generate some credit from the industry for doing the business as planned.
Fourth Quarter: experiencing a sudden and alarming stagnation of their bottom line, the Winners managed to lose any momentum from their margin as they struggled to generate interest, which was a credit to the Losers, as they sensed the need to continue with their classless account.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners handed some credit over to the competition which reinforced the interest of some analysts in placing them in a mini-crisis of confidence, which put undue interest in the Losers as they manufactured false confidence in a resource that requires a great deal to have merit.
First Quarter: the Losers utilised the plan they had been managing to effectively implement, which netted them a manageable margin going into the impending recession, as the Winners, stretched going forward due to the strain on the running of some of their business, managed a short-term loss.
Second Quarter: value-adding to the turnover they managed on the board, the Losers managed to be limited by the costly practices of accounting for the competition, which allowed the Winners sufficient room to negotiate a plan of attack going forward, which was feasible, and beneficial in the gloom.
Third Quarter: the Losers suffered a severe contraction of the turnover their business produced on the board, and manouvered their business into another credible loss, as the Winners, managing enough uncertainty to minimise the perception of a slump in their organisation, earned a gain.
Fourth Quarter: despite a late surge, the Losers cut the costs associated with a loss due to the industry they managed as a by-product of their strong values and integrity, which the Winners managed to negotiate as they put forward the proposal that their business going forward is poor, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers urged their workers to reach viable and manageable goals after the board had finalised its position, which the Winners assessed as "priceless" despite the potential damage the size of the margin inflicted on their fraudulent claims to leading the industry, in any department.
First Quarter: the Losers were denied the reward the account they managed to give deserved, which the climate demanded, and generated a manageable deficit, as the Winners, opening their account in the early part of trading, missed capitalising on a comparative advantage, for the rest.
Second Quarter: in a dramatic turnaround, the Winners slashed their confidence going into a deep recession, as the playing field opened up, allowing for more flowing business, which the Losers, generating a surge from the old firm, managed to prosper in, as the deficit deflated marginally.
Third Quarter: the Losers developed a margin from the deficit they had managed to acquire in the previous two quarters, which they relinquished as they looked to the board, which, as the last recession loomed, favoured the position the Winners had managed to align to their performance.
Fourth Quarter: surging with the loss of any expectation of an advantage, the Losers threatened to take control of the board, depsite the level of confidence disallowing such a takeover, which the Winners nervously maintained as they managed to lose confidence in their position, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers guaranteed themselves credit for the account they managed in assessing the outcome as the by-product of the value placed in risk-taking, which the Winners, despite the result on the table, are ill-equpped to invest in, as they transfer the means across the board.
First Quarter: the Losers defied the class imbalance that they have spent so long in managing, and suffered only a small loss, made in the early part of trading, which the Winners manufactured from the vast resources they have spent years managing, and proved costly going forward.
Second Quarter: slipping behind in their share of turnover on the board, the Losers managed to forecast the prospect of their deep depression continuing beyond the looming recession, which the Winners careered towards on the back of the business of their ownership of the practices employed.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed the period going into the last recession with another negative gain, which added up to three consecutive quarters of bleak results, as the Winners made several inaccurate measures, which made their board's targets, going forward, appear as grossly inadequate.
Fourth Quarter: registering a turnaround in the deficit, the Losers received a much needed injection of confidence into their organisation going forward, which was in part due to the Winners' inadequate handling of opportunity with expensive mismanagement of the means of production employed, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers gave a moderately factual account of their fulfillment of forecasts, which was offset by an attempt to defraud potential analysts with a plan to "formulate" a plan, which the Winners met with accounts of expensive problems within their organsitation, going forward.
First Quarter: the Winners managed to negotiate the difficult climate and savage impact of the gloom on the business of manufacturing with a marginal gain, as the Losers attracted widespread payouts from observers for the meagre returns they managed to deliver to their creditors on the board.
Second Quarter: as the conditions continued, the Winners nearly doubled their margin with another gain, brought on by a complete monopolisation of the means for doing business, which was added to by the Losers, compensating for the classless structure they have developed over time.
Third Quarter: the Winners resumed business immediately after the recession with a small gain, which threatened to create interest for observers and offered encouraging signs for the Losers, managing to stall the damage two consecutive quarters of losses had done, going into the last recession.
Fourth Quarter: increasing the gloom of the business of the day, the Winners produced another quarter consistent with their others and took an overall margin from a small loss, as the Losers, aligning their performance to the conditions, flooded the board with productive turnover, and a gain.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners admitted to analysts that they had failed to manage the difficult climate, and "struggled" with the strategies the competition had employed to negate the flow of their business, which is paying the Losers excessive credit for a mediocre peformance across the board.
First Quarter: the Winners managed to acquire viable confidence from a small advantage, gained after negotiating the loss of a deficit, which the Losers had acquired through the management of the property in their possession, and relinquished at a considerable cost to their organisation.
Second Quarter: maintaining the enterprise that had generated their margin, the Winners managed a significant and lasting advantage through positive actions from critical decisions, as the Losers headed towards the major recession considering the possibility of a depression following the deficit.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated losing ownership of the means of production through the competent management of the competition at board-level, which is where the Losers failed to align their performance and industry, as they managed to negotiate only a small increase in productivity.
Fourth Quarter: managing to maintain their advantage, the Winners experienced a nervous period associated with a surge in the competition's anxiety, which transferred to the board, and was aligned to the increasingly volatile and uncertain climate generated by the Losers' crisis of confidence.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners appreciated the value of acquiring a deserved "reward" for their "hard work" and enterprise, which built "confidence" in their business, and reversed the sentiments of the Losers, as they attempted to transfer the pressure of a crisis into the easing of a major depression.
First Quarter: the Losers slashed the deficit they had acquired through toxic assets by a wait-and-see approach which alowed them to make credible entries and secure some interest which had been the exclusive property of the Winners, who failed to consolidate on their advantage secured through capitalising on their co-operative competition.
Second Quarter: through the massive inequality of class, the Losers managed to quadruple their deficit which sent them into the recession considering the propect of a depression which was generated by the Winners consolidaing the ownership of the means to accelerate the anxiety of their competitors organsation, which rolled over.
Third Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficit from the recession by making concessions to their competitors on the board despite registering meagre returns for their industry which served to stimulate the Winners into consolidating their advantage after the recession and returning some confidence, to their credit, to their creditors.
Fourth Quarter: managing to make their competitors pay for their laissez-faire practices, the Losers secured some enterprise from their workers and the excessive turnover of the board, which had a minor impact on the overall margin the Winners had acquired because the individuals in their organisation managed competently.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the generated loss to the decision-making of those with ownership of the means of production, and attempted to defraud creditors into buying that they're growing, despite the Winners generating the gain through negotiating an improved peformance from their sustainable targets and adversity-overcoming.
First Quarter: the Losers exploited their class inequalities and manufactured opportunity through enterprise and the ownership of the centralised means. The Winners, going forward without realistic targets, relied on opportunistic capitalists to translate declining industry into moderate returns on the board, to the fraudulent denials of creditors.
Second Quarter: plummeting confidence and declining industry caused the Losers to relinquish their small gains as their board slowed down in the turn-around. Soaring confidence brought on by an increase in their industrial department, the Winners turned a deficit into a positive giving creditors cause to increase their fraudulent business.
Third Quarter: the Losers' stagnating turnover on the board and expensive delivery of the means of production gave observers reason to lose interest in their organistion. The Winners continued their upward pressure on the board as they profitted from their competitors' plentiful turnover and lent value to creditors' surging interest, fortunately.
Fourth Quarter: ineffective practices and the falling value the Losers placed in industry allowed their competitors to exploit their advantage across the board. Inaccurate delivery of the means of production and tired industry gave the Winners a distinct advantage that their creditors turned into massive gains that signalled a surge in interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed their losses on the board to the theft of confidence brought on by poor turnovers registered across all sectors, which cost them dearly. The Winners took the overall gain to be a signal for a turnaround in their overall industry which creditors bought, giving observers a loss of interest, to their falling credit.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated instability in a period of uncertainty through the responsible management of their organisation and a committment to accountability. The Losers managed to post the loss of a gain by breaking even after capitalising on their fortune through industry and the expoloitation of their opportunity.
Second Quarter: after trading had finished, the Winners made a marginal gain that was reflected on the board by the inequality of their relations in productivity. What gains the Losers had made were turned into losses after the rate of exchange became too much for their tired industry and lack of resources, as forecast.
Third Quarter: continuing a predictable trend, the Winners alienated analysts with their systematic and rigid lack of enterprising individualism for the sake of small gains on the board. What enterprise and vision the Losers' classless structure presented was more than balanced by their lack of realistic targets and, overheads.
Fourth Quarter: the Winners continued their consistent output with a productive performance at board level and the stalling of the growth of their competitors. The Losers experienced the slowing down of capital, as most analysts expected of industry in the down-turn, and left creditors with a loss, as forecast.
Fifth Quarter: the flexible exploitation of their comparative disadvantage gave the Winners the margin they needed to make the necessary modifications to their utilities. The Losers' comparative advantage was negligible once their lack of resources, vision at the top and class inequality had been factored into the package.
MY CHILDHOOD POETRY HERO
I was in my teens when I first became aware that I was attracted to elderly men. When I first saw Ernest Hemmingway blow his brains out I thought he was the most accurate shot I'd ever seen and I don't misplace my things deliberately.
MY CHILDHOOD PROSE HERO
Tom Wolfe was every conservatively attired schoolboy's merciless sodomiser in my generation and I was no different. I was just six years old when he first captured me with a nylon rope. Who would have dreamt that thirteen years later I would be dressing in women's clothes?
MY IDEA OF THE PERFECT POET
Ernest Hemmingway's remains the closest I have seen to a painless death. He had a perfect beard and a head that, when it wasn't being pumped full of performance enhancing substances, came clean off at the neck.
MY IDEA OF THE PERFECT PROSE WRITER
I stick with my boyhhood hero, Tom Wolfe. He was a complete arsehole in the sack. He was only interested in his own pleasure and he never let anything interfere with his arsehole. His discipline with a stick left a real mark on me.
FOR THE RECORD
Mike Sheahan, like the great Tom Wolfe, was born in his mother's fluids. Recognised as one of the 9/11 hijackers, he went on to land safely on an abandoned child's bare bottom before returning his overdue library books. He took them back without paying the fine. Naughty boy. An intelligent and cunning loiterer, he took a child when his mother wasn't watching and also scored some calamari so that it would absorb more flavour. To underline his standing in a queue at the bakery he did the old man in front of him wihout anyone even noticing. Notwithstanding the old man. His hands helped the old man's wife sign cheques for real estate that didn't exist.
The Togglers, fannily clicking, have, wall and drilly, smooched the Emos, loosening their gripe on the rodeo, on the lisp, stunk the dung in, as the two exchanged puddley flowers.
The Emos, on the deceiving end, rolled their arse back in their heads, as the Togglers, worming up for a bit of a snorkel, pulled out all the strumpets and wanked, growling away.
The Togglers, their ear coming to a head, extended their weed to a healthly margarine, while the Emos, faked in the head and licking balls, rang everywhere but the right spats, my lass!
The Emos, a noir to blacken their gnome, have had one of those yearns that laughs at its oaf, as the Togglers, twee cubed, lark back at a few gaunt lopes forward; hear the crapping?
The Toggers, on the back of their ear, are licking a head to the necks as they lick through their arse, as they do, the Emos, a lobeless ear, lick a forehead to much more mystery, ahas.
In the spit of Post-mortemism, I bring you this exclusive forced-hand repartee: the Poor, wanting wretches but heaving nuns, get a grope on the Emos, and that's a real mirthful!
Their teets chattering like braisers, their arses falling out of their heads, they went to the wally but the wally was wry, and so, the Poor, wit like the drowning poor, sunk the bots in, shirtkickers.
Their bots, muddy as a piddle on a tart road, erred like elle but, didn't we just leave it? no biddy knows, but for the Emos, damned and art, a lass like it is fart from what they would grieve.
It's spit on for their ear, as it's been one doleful grin after a nutter and mystery for the fans, which, fannily a sniff, is more or lass, the sane for the Poor, who've gone from bored to this.
The Cankers, always up for a spit and perish, give the Poor, short on groins, a real headwank; while the Emos will be praying for bride when the Ticklers blend them over, juts for fin.
Evil hearts retreat, it's true, for the read and the babble, the Dis uncovered the Costers in babblewarp and kicked them in the eyes as the vacuums spilled closer to a written spoon.
That they're shiite on the road is an abolute given, so munch, sow - that; they could get the spin that the Dis, one eye on the prose and the other on their eyes, might miss, shout!
Whatever, this wink is a much noodled bust for their wailing praying socks - the sock was sunk with great custard, while the Costers, courting their penises, thanked their mutton.
As their ear winks down, it's vagrantly oblivious that they want not to wink - such is laugh; while the Emos have much to gin for one moor, but will not want to get any more than hat.
The Poor offer Dis their disparate and angry, as they snuggle to get some bereave back; for the Costers it's time to be footers for the Gawks' canyons: they'll grow down in a hope.
Writing is the bile of words! The Cutters, filing on all colanders, drain the Emos, toss them in putty then fly them in for a rheumatic, dunny by kennel hate. Thank that for a joke!
The Emos, wella woman by the way she wires her halo, lend over and went all the way, for shampoo. The Cutters, shodding no merci, thank them with not a nancy of respect.
It's as one, weird, excepts of the ruining broomers: they put the fat down, and usually on the threat. This time it just opened to the Emos, pants down the weariest of the camp.
Without drought they will geld the written spin, but it could get warts before it gets butter; the Cutters, only heave to send out, for they'll get the takeaway - all thongs cream at a cuss.
The Swines, besaddling themselves with feel, could shit them down - if they do their stiff; while the Emos and Oglers piddle it out to see who ears the whinger of the rotten spin.
Add Comments
Comments (2)