First Quarter: the Losers were restricted in the amount of time they had to manage the means effectively, and stifled by a crippling lack of room to grow their business, which allowed the Winners, responsible for the limitations, to own every aspect of the negotiations, including the board's activity.
Second Quarter: credited with class, the Losers failed to manage to post any major gains at all for the entire period, which severely damaged their position as a sound group, and added value to the assessments of the Winners that they have ample class in all divisions to go forward safely.
Third Quarter: the Losers, managing to resolve some of their personnel issues, slashed their deficit with an increased capacity for working well under pressure, which the Winners managed to ignore the ramifications of into the last recession with a margin so manageable they could afford to relax.
Fourth Quarter: retaining much of the deficit they had managed to slash in the last quarter, the Losers suffered a savage check on the growth they had been managing, which was due to the Winners returning to their miserly management of the board, and the rebounding figures going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to account for the outcome with an account of the "need to develop our stocks", as they reiterated the stage their organisation is in, which conveyed to the Winners that their toil, and sacrifice of individual freedom, was due solely to the old firm's share.
First Quarter: the Winners limited the effect of the period of instability through the negotiation of the impact the damage the competition strategised to inflict on their business, which the Losers took credit for, as they careered towards a recession, managing a marginal gain on the board.
Second Quarter: managing a position on the board worth less than the industry they had managed, the Winners went into the major recession with the confidence a gain produces, which the Losers had managed as a by-product of the deficit they secured from a systematic method, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Winners incorporated enterprise into their plan and managed a savage surge in the turnover managed on the board, as the Losers, struggling to generate vision or accountability, declined into the last recession, which allowed them the relief of modifying the structure of their business.
Fourth Quarter: as the environment opened itself up for a more cohesive flow of business from all sides, the Winners managed to contract the size of their margin, as the Losers, concerned about the welfare of bludgers, surged closer to the competition, which was always beyond their means.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the overall outcome they managed to the management of their assets going forward, and the precision of their actions in the long-run, as the Losers managed to account for their result to the costly decision to value ownership over enterprise and endeavour.
First Quarter: the Winners banked on their old firm delivering them an absolute advantage, which proved to be a capital idea as they gained a margin after falling into deficit, which the Losers had assisted in the making of, despite the business of their organisation, through the inequality of class.
Second Quarter: consolidating an advantage with added value, the Winners managed to align the board with their enterprise, which virtually guaranteed confidence, as the Losers, struggling with the management of class, produced a second consecutive quarter going into the big break.
Third Quarter: the Winners compounded their gains, despite managing to measure the means with their ultimate goals with a rate of returns that minimised their break, which the Losers managed to make marginally more taxing than it had been in the last recession, and produced the risk of a big loss.
Fourth Quarter: for a second consecutive quarter after the last serious recession, the Winners managed another marginal gain, which added value to the break they had managed in the previous two quarters, as the Losers, adhering to the model business plan they had devised, suffered a depression.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners urged caution from investors willing to pay them out for their previous performances, reminding creditors that the value of an advantage delivers that option, which generated a serious admission from the Losers that "we were really poor", and was a good account.
First Quarter: the Winners managed to negotiate the difficult climate and savage impact of the gloom on the business of manufacturing with a marginal gain, as the Losers attracted widespread payouts from observers for the meagre returns they managed to deliver to their creditors on the board.
Second Quarter: as the conditions continued, the Winners nearly doubled their margin with another gain, brought on by a complete monopolisation of the means for doing business, which was added to by the Losers, compensating for the classless structure they have developed over time.
Third Quarter: the Winners resumed business immediately after the recession with a small gain, which threatened to create interest for observers and offered encouraging signs for the Losers, managing to stall the damage two consecutive quarters of losses had done, going into the last recession.
Fourth Quarter: increasing the gloom of the business of the day, the Winners produced another quarter consistent with their others and took an overall margin from a small loss, as the Losers, aligning their performance to the conditions, flooded the board with productive turnover, and a gain.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners admitted to analysts that they had failed to manage the difficult climate, and "struggled" with the strategies the competition had employed to negate the flow of their business, which is paying the Losers excessive credit for a mediocre peformance across the board.
First Quarter: the Losers managed to slash the deficit they had acquired through the early exchange period with the assistance of the pressure they applied to the board, which indicated to observers that the Winners managed to secure a significant share of the turnover with secure measures.
Second Quarter: accurate measures from developing options generated a significant reduction in the Losers' deficit, which had blown-out to unmanageable levels after the Winners managed to secure the means of production and, going forward with enterprise, capitalised with efficient processing.
Third Quarter: the Losers owned the quarter with a late rally that had halted their slide after the recession, and generated significant interest from observers that the Winners, surging with interest in productivity following the recession, might not be in a position to negotiate an absolute advantage.
Fourth Quarter: any demand observers had for a turnaround in the Losers' fortunes were slashed due to a decline in productivity, and the costly business of supplying the Winners with an incentive to demonstrate to analysts that their business is not in decline, which is currently in surplus.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers positively generated a large amount of "credit" for their performance despite the last quarter, which "would have to be described as really poor", as the Winners managed to deliver to analysts an accurate assessment of the margin, and supply creditors with optimism.
First Quarter: the Losers manufactured legitimate concern for recording modest gains in a climate that was assessed by forecasts as liable to push their business in the right direction, and allowed the Winners to manufacture a significantly better loss than had been forecast, despite the poor figures.
Second Quarter: in a dramatic turnaround, the Losers managed to reduce their output to earn a significant loss moving into the recession, which the Winners went into with renewed optimism due to the size and scope of their gain, earned through their initiative in utilising the conditions.
Third Quarter: the Losers rallied late to slash their margin to give observers some interest in investing in their business after it had increased markedly due to the Winners accurately measuring the means against their ultimate targets, and the enterprising accountability associated with their business.
Fourth Quarter: carried forward by their confidence, the Losers managed to secure an overall gain in early trading that was manufactured into a loss by the Winners, who managed to identify the formula they required to acquire the absolute advantage, which they put into practice with industry.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the loss to their decision-making which they generated through the manufacture of dwindling levels of confidence in their business, which the Winners compounded with an interest in giving credit to a number of people in their organisation who did the business.
First Quarter: in a sharply contracting environment, the Losers distributed responsibility for productivity in an attempt to stimulate liquidity from the running of their business. The Winners, owed an outstanding debt, placed pressure on their competitors' supply and capitalised on their breaks with efficient productivity from their viable targets.
Second Quarter: the Losers gave creditors reason to lose pessimism with an improved performance on the board - equated to confidence in their efficient distribution. The Winners manufactured a small loss for an overall margin that had them headed for the recession with renewed optimism in a moderately saturated environment.
Third Quarter: held to account for the running of their business, the Losers went into a decline that precipitated a pessimistic outlook from their creditors that lent confidence to observers. The Winners capitalised on their absolute advantage with the manufacture of productive gains recorded on the board from opportunistic business practices.
Fourth Quarter: the Losers profitted from the benefit of modest initial gains which were rapidly converted into a massive deterioration of the margin as the pressure decimated their industry. The Winners cornered their competitors' share of the means of production in the difficult environment and surged to huge gains with their productivity soaring.
Fifth Quarter: forced to account for their losses to analysts, the Losers gave creditors reason to question their interest under the pressure of a contraction of growth in the running of their business. The Winners utilised the pressure of a contracting environment they were largely responsible for creating and gained the interest of analysts, if not observers.
First Quarter: contrary to the gloomy forecasts, the Losers suffered an unexpected deficit that required a significant investment in industry to rectify. The Winners showed the benefits of heavy industry and a positive outlook with strong figures registered but only ineptitude on the board cost them greater margins.
Second Quarter: a sudden upsurge in the Losers output and cost-cutting across the board gave them renewed confidence after posting excellent returns for their investment. The Winners were suddenly held to account for their expenditure and found their sectors had less room for profit which served to reinforce their belief in industry.
Third Quarter: the Losers continued the trend of reaping excellent dividends from their limited investments and at one stage had large gains but couldn't secure their advantage. The Winners returned moderate results in a foreign market and only recorded a small loss which amounted to breaking even after looking like slipping well into arears earlier.
Fourth Quarter: the predicted slowing down in output was largely responsible for the Losers loss of efficiency after they posted an unexpected loss, to the disdain of their investors. The Winners experienced a continuation of their meagre returns for a high level of productivity and in the final analysis were rewarded for their industry.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers suffered the scrutiny of an investigation into the productivity of their key stocks and lamented their lack of industry when the opportunity to capitalise presented itself. The Winners showed the benefits of giving credit to their competitors and rightfully viewed their small margin as a large gain.
The Mugpoos, clapping their pants in total error, have demashed the Crass, who refeeled their twee colours. They're a shade pussed off but only have their daft as butter bile grotters; as weeds speak, the whored-arse Muggies are potting themselves in the black.
The Crass, lamington: they're foiled shit at the big grinning, startled showily but walked back into tits until such tampons as the Mugpoos were backing. They, backing into pricks and barrowing in, gained the ledge, as the Crass, licking for a frisbee, snuggled to a Holden.
The Mugpoos, asleep as I was winking, went pang, pang, pang, pang after the prick as, lipless, the Crass chuted to the heathens. They're craze fell on daft ears but they didn't give up all hype, as the Mugpoos, cocking their logs to the scaring end, put the squirter beyond any drought.
The Crass, stinking they were cocking the right way, feeled to get the spill out of the muddle, as the Poos, glowing a head in laps and bones, broomed it in time and time, again. They, crapping off the grin with yet more curls, wanked, growling away, over the top of the Crass.
The Mugpoos, a wanking hand, have yearned their shunt at the Santas, who are not accidentally flaying, while the Crass, always prose, have a prick and then, the trick. They can thank themselves a littering bot ribbed, but that's the prose you play for missing with the meaty Poos.
The Crass, a pail of rabbits, have jarred into the top floor, and out, with a caustic wank over the Dullblogs, meekly gluing lamps for their toilet at the big window, to the drone of a cripple.
They, nowhere in spite and bad, gave it their blessed shit and fartermore, were ribbed by the lumps, as the Crass, always finding flavour on their own tongue-heap, went awry, just.
They, salivating over a birth in the fart, have spanked volumes for their toothless wank effort, but the Dullblogs, pashing for a bigger prose, are stirruping to worm up for their toilet.
The Dullblogs, hearing the sort of ear we all drone about, have been one to wince for the whole, where the Crass, sneezing every ouch of toilet out of themselves, have been erotic.
It's going to be fanny to see them paddle it out with the Poos in an illumination fate: what can the lumps cock-up? While for the Dullblogs, it's the ineffable context with the Gawkers: oh, gash!
Well if you want bard, enough! The Santas, on a one hearse, slay the Crass, a toilet dinner, to cellotape a millstone. It turns out the pain inflected on the Crass was worse than washed farts.
Too manic, mutterers worsen for the Crass - they are drying to get a front half glowing for the vital suction; whoreass, the Santas, praying to creep a spit into the hate, are tit and a bot here.
There can be no drought as to their girl-snakes, as they shod the Crass: the adoration of the munchies. The Crass, humpty in the front bits, licked bite compered by the Santas - and hats sniff!
It has to make you wander, can the Crass wank outside their own bitch? I regress, we'll phone doubt soon. As sour as shit, we'll be seething - the Santas go yell for lather in the fates.
Forced, they mush the Bumblers, fondling around in the dank, who are shirt on for pliers but don't like art. The Crass, I don't lark to be read, need to get some pants in their front bits: Dullards.
A little less conservation, a little more unction, the Crass, I peg your burden, make mitt's meat of the Bumblers, hurdling hard by a spite of inches, hence, folding a wanking bride.
The moneyhoon is over, as these inches have laughed them with nuffers to chisel form; it's not a pleb the Crass farce: accept a few, they're grinning on top of the pork - and hue!
Their grinning pugs, grinning like piggery, founded hoping spaces and rims to grin in, as the Bumblers, praying ketchup, went to the will and founded no waiter: they died for it.
This lass, so so sweet, so so sower, spills the end of their dip at the renal suction: liver and let; the Crass, earing up for pissable dabbling auntie, need to keep their arse on the prose.
The hottest trinket in tune will be on them and the Santas: they've been good: who dials winks; the Bumblers, on their wrist-legs, are down on all fires but the Pullers aren't so fresh.
In front of their endearing fins, the Cows tonally wince when they see the Togglers, not clocking and hooplessly out of rhyme, as the points are pulled and eyes are waxed.
The points, once wading about so high, now keeping the uncles tasty, went the other way, as the Cows, pulling on a baklava, ribbed the muff - they wearily stunk it to get her.
She, the girls on the bird, is in the pooper, if you don't believe me - she for yourshelf - and what a lapsided affair it tarred out to be - the Togglers foiled to shank, let alone bonk.
It smells curtains for their slim dish at the hate, but all is not noosed - they have shorn a sheepload of curry - more so the Cows: inline skanking for a top fart spit, and mire?
Combing off a venerable deflate, the Bumblers, thin and thin abbotts, will grieve them a gold shank; as the Togglers, fisting a toff one, have no respit: it's the Gawkers, for moan.
Need me in the groin and cry art! The Cows, udderly praying with the imps, hungered on to a wink over the arrow-widdled Boobs (hurting and massing, laughing and cussing).
Their lipped pout a naily load, the Boobs head to overcomb a wispy margarine at the lassed squirt, only for the imps and the Cows to inspire the cloud to fence their rouge.
The Cows, capsizing on the heap of the imps, went a pout. Their business, mainly. The Boobs, garrotted in deflate, simpering had their chins but no sugar. Nuffers mind.
Still winging it for the hate, they now weed to whinge at every paste. Not one yodel can they feel out. The Cows, in the hate, are like a botch of ants with a grin of lice.
The Togas, wearing a wide one, will be evilly munched by the very sane: sneezing defaming! While the Boobs and the Poor try it on, and there's no laugh lost here.
Add Comments
Comments (2)