Round 5, 2009, Brisbane lost to Geelong
First Quarter: the Winners maximised the advantage they had managed through the minimisation of the costly business of negotiating the competition, as the Losers maximised their disadvantage, in the gloomy conditions, with excessive mismanagement of what opportunity they could manage.
Second Quarter: as the conditions met the forecasts, the Winners generated an excessive margin from operating their business of maintaining control of their monopoly, which generated the prospect of a depression for the Losers, after they experienced two consecutive quarters of negativity.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to consolidate their advantage in the conditions, and generated a significant shortfall of interest from neutral observers, which the Losers, struggling to generate opportunity for the small percentage of class in their structure, paid for, going backwards.
Fourth Quarter: as the gloom generated liquidity in the climate, the Winners continued their miserly approach to the competition and benefitted from a return to productivty, as the Losers produced an account of their organisation, which generated a severe depression for creditors and observers.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attempted to defraud analysts into investing excessive interest in credit for their result to resources they had inherited, which paid small credit to the effective business the Losers manufactured in engineeering an outlook of better returns, going forward with optimism.
Second Quarter: as the conditions met the forecasts, the Winners generated an excessive margin from operating their business of maintaining control of their monopoly, which generated the prospect of a depression for the Losers, after they experienced two consecutive quarters of negativity.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to consolidate their advantage in the conditions, and generated a significant shortfall of interest from neutral observers, which the Losers, struggling to generate opportunity for the small percentage of class in their structure, paid for, going backwards.
Fourth Quarter: as the gloom generated liquidity in the climate, the Winners continued their miserly approach to the competition and benefitted from a return to productivty, as the Losers produced an account of their organisation, which generated a severe depression for creditors and observers.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attempted to defraud analysts into investing excessive interest in credit for their result to resources they had inherited, which paid small credit to the effective business the Losers manufactured in engineeering an outlook of better returns, going forward with optimism.
 Add Comments
|
|
