Round 9, 2009, Western Bulldogs lost to Geelong
First Quarter: the Losers got the business running in limiting the severity of the class inequality evident on paper by managing to halve the figures the competition managed, which equated to a deficit the Winners could manage to add to, as their group struggled for structure, going forward.
Second Quarter: misdirected actions and a tight workplace limited the growth of the deficit the Losers managed to slash, as they added confidence to their optimism, which the Winners added inflation to as the interest of observers rallied, after the competition went into a major recession, looking up.
Third Quarter: the Losers owned the competition, despite failing to manage to manage the position on the board aligned to the systematic control of the means across the board, which the Winners negotiated, as they struggled to consistently find a realistic target to focus their advances on.
Fourth Quarter: liable to doubt the validity of their own confidence, the Losers managed an outcome that was more closely aligned to the work of the competition, which guaranteed the Winners an outcome they had managed due to the confidence they had built up over time, to their credit.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to avoid paying out the person responsible for missing the ultimate opportunity that cost them the value their industry warranted, which detracted slightly from the account the Winners managed to perform of paying out the person they held solely responsible.
Second Quarter: misdirected actions and a tight workplace limited the growth of the deficit the Losers managed to slash, as they added confidence to their optimism, which the Winners added inflation to as the interest of observers rallied, after the competition went into a major recession, looking up.
Third Quarter: the Losers owned the competition, despite failing to manage to manage the position on the board aligned to the systematic control of the means across the board, which the Winners negotiated, as they struggled to consistently find a realistic target to focus their advances on.
Fourth Quarter: liable to doubt the validity of their own confidence, the Losers managed an outcome that was more closely aligned to the work of the competition, which guaranteed the Winners an outcome they had managed due to the confidence they had built up over time, to their credit.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to avoid paying out the person responsible for missing the ultimate opportunity that cost them the value their industry warranted, which detracted slightly from the account the Winners managed to perform of paying out the person they held solely responsible.
 Add Comments
|
|
