First Quarter: the Losers got the business running in limiting the severity of the class inequality evident on paper by managing to halve the figures the competition managed, which equated to a deficit the Winners could manage to add to, as their group struggled for structure, going forward.
Second Quarter: misdirected actions and a tight workplace limited the growth of the deficit the Losers managed to slash, as they added confidence to their optimism, which the Winners added inflation to as the interest of observers rallied, after the competition went into a major recession, looking up.
Third Quarter: the Losers owned the competition, despite failing to manage to manage the position on the board aligned to the systematic control of the means across the board, which the Winners negotiated, as they struggled to consistently find a realistic target to focus their advances on.
Fourth Quarter: liable to doubt the validity of their own confidence, the Losers managed an outcome that was more closely aligned to the work of the competition, which guaranteed the Winners an outcome they had managed due to the confidence they had built up over time, to their credit.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to avoid paying out the person responsible for missing the ultimate opportunity that cost them the value their industry warranted, which detracted slightly from the account the Winners managed to perform of paying out the person they held solely responsible.
First Quarter: the Winners attracted the interest of observers despite what the board maintained, and managed to generate a majority of the share of the board's activity, which the Losers had attempted to minimise as they struggled to create interest from their limited share of the means.
Second Quarter: guaranteed a position on the board worth their organisation, the Winners managed their business going into a recession with great expertise, which caused the Losers to experience pain going forward as they struggled to find any class going forward, as the break extended.
Third Quarter: the Winners, sluggish after the recession, struggled to add valuable points to their strategy of unrelenting industry in a structured arrangement within the industry, which the Losers managed some credit from, as they managed to stall the competition, across the board.
Fourth Quarter: secure in the advantage their strategy had managed, the Winners struggled, under the expectations of gloom, to add unsustainable growth to a certain percentage, which the Losers lost a large chunk of, in the final analysis, as their deficit blew out late in the piece, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to distribute credit for the outcome evenly going forward, owing to the substantive quality of the work their key sectors managed, which the Losers attempted to match with positive reports of the new resources they're developing to win property disputes.
First Quarter: the Losers declined observers any interest as they managed to restrict the flow of the business of turnover on the board, which generated only a minor deficit, as the Winners, struggling to manage in the absence of some class, negotiated the period with a minimal damage, and a gain.
Second Quarter: their deficit suffering from inflation, the Losers went into the major recession with a severe depression generated by the disintegration of their confidence, which the Winners accentuated through the business of performing enterprisingly that one single resource managed for them.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to contract the discrepancy in class, which they aligned to the figures the board managed at certain stages, despite the deficit continuing to inflate, as the Winners, doing the business, negotiated the forecast surge of the competition's old firm.
Fourth Quarter: after the last recession the Losers continued to manage their deficit as inflation generated a substantial loss of a certain percentage they brought to the table, which reversed the result for the Winners, as they spent the last period, manufacturing another gain, effectively.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the size and scope of the deficit they managed to the class of the structure they struggled with, and made accurate assessments across the board, which was met by the Winners with a good account of their implementation of the strategy they had devised.
First Quarter: the Losers defied the class imbalance that they have spent so long in managing, and suffered only a small loss, made in the early part of trading, which the Winners manufactured from the vast resources they have spent years managing, and proved costly going forward.
Second Quarter: slipping behind in their share of turnover on the board, the Losers managed to forecast the prospect of their deep depression continuing beyond the looming recession, which the Winners careered towards on the back of the business of their ownership of the practices employed.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed the period going into the last recession with another negative gain, which added up to three consecutive quarters of bleak results, as the Winners made several inaccurate measures, which made their board's targets, going forward, appear as grossly inadequate.
Fourth Quarter: registering a turnaround in the deficit, the Losers received a much needed injection of confidence into their organisation going forward, which was in part due to the Winners' inadequate handling of opportunity with expensive mismanagement of the means of production employed, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers gave a moderately factual account of their fulfillment of forecasts, which was offset by an attempt to defraud potential analysts with a plan to "formulate" a plan, which the Winners met with accounts of expensive problems within their organsitation, going forward.
First Quarter: the Winners maximised the advantage they had managed through the minimisation of the costly business of negotiating the competition, as the Losers maximised their disadvantage, in the gloomy conditions, with excessive mismanagement of what opportunity they could manage.
Second Quarter: as the conditions met the forecasts, the Winners generated an excessive margin from operating their business of maintaining control of their monopoly, which generated the prospect of a depression for the Losers, after they experienced two consecutive quarters of negativity.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to consolidate their advantage in the conditions, and generated a significant shortfall of interest from neutral observers, which the Losers, struggling to generate opportunity for the small percentage of class in their structure, paid for, going backwards.
Fourth Quarter: as the gloom generated liquidity in the climate, the Winners continued their miserly approach to the competition and benefitted from a return to productivty, as the Losers produced an account of their organisation, which generated a severe depression for creditors and observers.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attempted to defraud analysts into investing excessive interest in credit for their result to resources they had inherited, which paid small credit to the effective business the Losers manufactured in engineeering an outlook of better returns, going forward with optimism.
First Quarter: the Losers managed to slash the deficit they had acquired through the early exchange period with the assistance of the pressure they applied to the board, which indicated to observers that the Winners managed to secure a significant share of the turnover with secure measures.
Second Quarter: accurate measures from developing options generated a significant reduction in the Losers' deficit, which had blown-out to unmanageable levels after the Winners managed to secure the means of production and, going forward with enterprise, capitalised with efficient processing.
Third Quarter: the Losers owned the quarter with a late rally that had halted their slide after the recession, and generated significant interest from observers that the Winners, surging with interest in productivity following the recession, might not be in a position to negotiate an absolute advantage.
Fourth Quarter: any demand observers had for a turnaround in the Losers' fortunes were slashed due to a decline in productivity, and the costly business of supplying the Winners with an incentive to demonstrate to analysts that their business is not in decline, which is currently in surplus.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers positively generated a large amount of "credit" for their performance despite the last quarter, which "would have to be described as really poor", as the Winners managed to deliver to analysts an accurate assessment of the margin, and supply creditors with optimism.
First Quarter: the Losers employed the strategy of owning the means of production and holding their competitors' business operations to account which paid a dividend despite the inaccurate records registered by the board and the due diligence of the Winners, who managed to record modest returns for their industry and insecure property management.
Second Quarter: counting the cost of their cautious attempts to manufacture records at the board-level through their fraudulent practices, the Losers forced creditors into instability bought on by the Winners monopolising the means of production and centralising control of their ownership of property, once the disputes had been managed successfully.
Third Quarter: the Losers negotiated the terms of their deficit, despite their competitors' interest in giving them credit, through industry and ownership of the means but failed to capitalise which accounted for the Winners managing to negotiate their deteriorating productivity due to costly inaccuracies and the extent of their existing margin.
Fourth Quarter: co-operating with their competitors, the Losers allowed their deficit to increase through their failure to own disputed property but slashed the margin when their competitors, the Winners, delivered on their earlier promise to relax any accounting for their competitors' interest and place the credit for their value on their collective individualism.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to negotiate any credit observers' interest raised through observing the value of the class in their structure and transferring large amounts to the Winners, who recounted to analysts the influence the last recession had on reinforcing the value they place in manufacturing a structure that works because of class.
First Quarter: the Winners, after early trading, countered resistance to their productivity from their competitor's measures by monopolising control at the board-level. The Losers forced remaining creditors to reassess their investment in a return to liquidity with a significant loss of productivity of their manufacture of returns on the board.
Second Quarter: with a number of options to be taken into account, the Winners extended their margin as the recession loomed and inaccuracies registered on the board threatened. The Losers increased their industry and, largely due to accurate record-keeping from the board, were liable to give analysts enough interest to return as creditors.
Third Quarter: the Winners turned the recession into a crisis, albeit their stocks decimated by a loss of fortune, with a massive turnaround in their costs. The Losers made a substantial deficit a gain of one small point due to their industry employing the services of their structure and the equal distribution of productivity, in a turnaround.
Fourth Quarter: confidence in their systems gave the the Winners the means to produce enough exploitation of opportunity and turn around a stagnating turnover. The Losers lost the means of production which stalled the growth of their productivity and caused their bubble to burst, to the absolute disadvantage of their position on the board.
Fifth Quarter: tired industry was given as the major reason why the Winners failed to monopolise productivity on the board as credit was relinquished to their competitors. The Losers passed credit for their improved industry on and attempted to defraud analysts into putting pressure on to their competitors, who, cyclically, reciprocated the measures.
First Quarter: the Winners invested heavily in their industry but saw little return for their endeavour which served to underline their lack of confidence under pressure. The Losers, sensing a surge in their competitors overall output, were undaunted by the less than positive outlook.
Second Quarter: despite recording excellent numbers, the Winners failed to capitalise on their booming figures which caused them to question the efficiency of their plan. The Losers utilised their hard-nosed business attributes to ignore the gloom the figures forecast and recorded better than expected losses.
Third Quarter: the Winners finally saw some healthy returns for their industry as unheralded resources showed the value of investing for the long-term. The Losers invested heavily in new resources as their most valuable assets struggled to find any room in their sectors for growth.
Fourth Quarter: a distinct slowing down in the property sector linked to a lack of industrial resources served to undermine the Winners in the eyes of the overall industry. The Losers found renewed confidence as their key figures showed a resurgence in their ability to manage their sector.
Fifth Quarter: a nervous and unhappy sentiment drove the Winners to apologise to their investors for their shaky margins and lack of growth in the overall numbers. The Losers found reasons for investors to place their confidence in excellent returns despite what the board said.
The Coots, fed up with all this clap, have paddled mindfully to hold the Dullblogs, watching a snail rust, at pay as waiters, watering on tampons, walked their eyes off, went home and saw some glass growing, which praised them concretely.
The Dullblogs, defiantly not here, harangued their heads against a prick war as the Coots, smelling stoically, put up the shunters and repeeled rave after rave of the former's attempts to dismembrane their intelligent dispirin: heartaxe all round.
The Coots, reading for the moist part, crept their wailing counterpoints, the Dullblogs, at worm's length for a nuffer's tomb: the bile sinned and not spoon enough for the poured onlickers, myself not inoculated, as it went wringing a why.
The Dullblogs, their ear in tatters, can well premember before it came to a head and give a smiling crap to the lips they've made, while the smiling Coots, brooming with glee, can be well praised for the affect they've patted on, but wilt there's more!
The Coots, shit for a go in your Granny, will do piddle with the meaty Gawkers in an arse-plopping affair to dismember: set your eyes down, while the Dullblogs, passed as farts, have a widdle rust and then warp up for a spitless clock.
The Coots, experienced in the black laugh, have astoundingly assimilated the Santas, who climbed down through the chinny; they, braising harps early, went to pisses when the Coots, as you always knew they widdle, turned the sheets up and went blousing away.
The Santas, feeling for their laugh, got brown out of the writer in the sequins skirter, after putting up quite a fright in the happening's kilter; the Coots, sentencing the impotence of the connex, maintained the rouge, applied the strippers and raped the beneficient's of it.
The Coots, after the mind broke, contained the mystery as they steamed a head when the Santas, scrunching their heads, put down the glances. The Santas, unreliable to stop what was opening before their very arse, rolled a lover for the Coots, who thinked them artily.
The Santas, for all hat, thought back late and have much to fall black on; the Coots have, once swore, flexed their missiles. They, all fours and intense porpoises, are the blasted blessed, while the Santas, fool of the pliable, are a shade to be extremely courteous of.
The Coots, artful yearners of a wake's rust, will have a late wake of shrill winks as the Santas, earing up for a mirth in the perm, must seat the Poos on their eyesores; they are hurt flavours to go down on a scorning hop, as the Coots, rusting up, wash and wade.
The Clatters, nosey as a stinky-book, have swayed the Costers by all but one hungry pants; the harpless Costers, angelic as saturn, started bratly then shod their true callouses.
They rang around like a hand with its chicken cut up for the rust, and were salient as the Clatters, amourous and lewd, steamed up together to piss the bile; a monk's themselves.
They all grotted in on the icked - and rumped away, seemingly at their own laser but it's harder than hat; the Costers, a poetic punch of potty-poos, were too skanky to munch it.
They've rarely had a bad sneezing - palpably the wart's in their arsery and defiantly one to dismember; the Clatters, obversely making a rot of nurses, have famished off the pest's rot.
The Clatters, panging around inside my shed, rustle with their ole vowels in the Santas, woo; for the Costers, the prose of this seer has been fart to eye, and that's a snot, for shower.
You'd think that I'd have chuckled in the towel by now, but when the Coots, a pinch of clits if ever there was, smooched the Cankers, arching for a belt, I could heartily say nothinks.
The Cankers, crept in there thanks to a phonepole in the scare, were brown out of the waiter in the turd squirter when the Coots, misters at browning out of the writer, went pang.
You'd have rung your arses out, in such a sentence of awww would you have been; but spell a thought for the Cankers - they had to pat up with the embellishment of such a lass.
The Cankers, about to crap off their shagging plopper, have tasted the Coots - lick no nutter, and that sees it all; because the Coots are defiantly the blessed on moist days.
You'd get a tellable schlock, were you to wash them take to the Costers with the lunghandle; while the Cankers tone up with their moldy animus: the Poor, in a paddle for the itches.
If bride comes before a fool, then it's heartily surprising to she the Coots flock the Swines, and even lassoo, the wowsers go drown without - I've a hard-on - a whisper; naughty.
Well, that's not untitled or two: the Swines got as crass as could be extrapolated by any sane parsnip; the Coots, like one pink box of twats, mouth the custard and are as clean.
At least that euphemistic - I mean to shag by that they augur: they're pants, very well; the Swines, ruling around in their own farces, went farting as fart as pissable but lick clothes.
It's the tail of their ear - it's also the sane of their seamstress - so you never nose their fartness; the Coots, profoundly steep, just need to keep managing obstetricians for a flog.
A congester, the Cankers, will examine the Coots: get your binary-joculars on! Schwing 'em around and around to catch a chimps of the Swines getting their eyes warped by the Piss.
Add Comments
Comments (7)