First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the business of acquiring a significant share of the meagre turnover analysts observed transpiring on the board, and compounded it with the minimisation of the Losers' efficiency at aligning the means of production with the most manageable of targets.

Second Quarter: capitalising on the oppourtunity afforded them, the Winners managed to continue the slow returns of the board, which served to supply the Losers' creditors with the probability of a depression resulting from the overall interest lost by analysts during the impending recession.

Third Quarter: the Winners, in one single quarter, managed to double the size and scope of the margin they had acquired over two consecutive quarters, which was due to the Losers' incompetence at the board level, aligned to the performance of their distributions and property management.

Fourth Quarter: delivering the overall gain that creditors required to maintain interest, the Winners acquired their margin despite the dwindling turnover of their board, and the Losers management of the surge in confidence produced by the enterprise of their industry, and poorly managed actions.

Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast the margin the people in their organisation managed would generate a significant growth in confidence in their business, which reversed the trend the Losers had managed in building interest, which they admitted was "pretty costly" in the overall scheme.