First Quarter: the Losers signalled their intention to dispute the validity of the crisis analysts had aligined to the poor performance they have been building up over time, which the Winners failed to compensate adequately for, after expectations of a severe deficit experienced a turnaround.
Second Quarter: going into a deep recession with confidence the crisis had been managed, the Losers held a position on the board that was not forecast by even the most optimistic, which generated uncertainty from observers that the Winners, managing to square the ledger, would negotiate the crisis.
Third Quarter: the Losers guaranteed the last recession would consolidate the crisis after they managed to confirm their position as an organisation bereft of class, which the Winners accentuated when they managed to stimulate the economy of their transference of the means with a margin.
Fourth Quarter: slumping in inverse proportion to their early rally, the Losers suffered severe pain across the board as they managed to reaffirm the perception of a deep crisis, which the Winners compounded with a share of free-flowing business and rebounding optimism, right across the board.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to retain some optimism from the outcome, "and we've got to look at the personnel and see who can take us forward and who can't", which contrasts sharply with the genuine management of confidence the Winners managed after managing a sharp rise in credit.
First Quarter: the Winners implemented the organisation of their group around the movements of the competition and managed to make a substantial dividend for their share, which the Losers had no option to minimise as they attempted to get their business going across the board, going forward.
Second Quarter: the margin they managed contracting, the Winners laboured to generate enterprise going into a deep recession, which they managed with a margin, as the Losers, their business up and running, slashed their deficit in a protected environment, and looked the goods, indeed.
Third Quarter: the Winners, struggling to extend the class in their system, suffered a second consecutive quarter of contraction to the deficit they managed for the Losers, which allowed them to deliver a massive boost in confidence to their poor creditors, many of whom deserved to be paid out.
Fourth Quarter: following the last recession, the Winners lost yet more of the gains they had made in earlier exchanges, which proved ample in the overall scheme, as the Losers, negotiating without the benefit of their full entitlements, put a viable plan in place to garner good interest, in the future.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to make the ever decreasing margin they managed into a lesson in educating their personnel across the board, which the Losers met with a poor attempt to pass their account off as a means to make themselves liable to be truthful, and avoided a hefty pay out.
First Quarter: the Losers reached a position on the board which analysts aligned to the performance they managed, depsite a number of inadequate measures they managed, which added value to the credit placed in the Winners, as they negotiated the pressure of the situation, going forward.
Second Quarter: managing a surge across the board, the Losers added stability to their business with more manageable strategies going forward securing them a margin, which guaranteed the Winners added incentive to collect themselves in the big recession, with a marginal deficit.
Third Quarter: the Losers paid the price on the board for the decline in industry observed by analysts by managing to make a margin into sizeable and sustainable deficit, which the responsibilty for had to be taken by the Winners, as they added sound decision-making practices to their risk-taking.
Fourth Quarter: incorporating incompetence into their poor levels of industry, the Losers added more numbers to their deficit as questions were asked of their business, which the Winners managed to answer with a negative report of the discrepancies of input, in the competition, and an advantage.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers "were trying to rob different areas" of their organisation to add stability to their liabilty to lose interest in maintaining accountability in keeping the costs down, which balanced effectively with the Winners, as they attempted to manage fraudulent accounts of their socialism.
First Quarter: the Losers managed their surplus of confidence with a deficit recorded at board-level, which severely restricted the operations of the business of giving a good account, as the Winners negotiated the impact of a previously empty account with a productive period, overall.
Second Quarter: compromised by a savage conflict between their industry and targets, the Losers aligned their inaccurate measures with a second consecutive quarter, which the Winners had to take credit for going into a major recession with a massive deficit for the competition, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to break even after being given a major break, which hindered their prospects for gaining the position on the board they sought, as the Winners managed to experience a stagnant period in the venture they undertook to attain solid gains, quarter by quarter.
Fourth Quarter: the conditions for business improved markedly, the Losers managed to give a good account of the sort of business they are liable to manage, going forward, which benefited the Winners, as they posted another gain on the board, which was aligned to the performance managed.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to avoid giving credible accounts for the position they managed, due to the widespread fraud prevalent in the industry in these tough times, which contrasted sharply with the Winners' accounting practices of managing their reports of results poorly, overall.
First Quarter: the Winners consolidated the gloomy conditions with a margin that analysts forecast would remain until the close of trading, and was due to the Losers managing to maintain the demand for advantage, which was negotiated despite the wealth of contracting supply.
Second Quarter: manufacturing sizeable returns from their interest in enterprise going forward, the Winners rewarded creditors with sufficient enough gains to break even, which was assisted by the Losers' industry slowing down across the board, and poor options, in terms of realistic targets.
Third Quarter: the Winners gambled with the opportunities their industry earned them, which gave a poor account of the discrepancies in the willingness for work, if not class, between they and the Losers, who managed, through a late and fortunate rally, to gain some valuable confidence.
Fourth Quarter: in the gloom, the Winners surged late to give an accurate account of their advantage over the competition, which they managed after some slippery deals, and the Losers' poor management of transferring ownership of the means of production into an absolute advantage.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners paid credit for their margin to their core values which they attributed as supplying the conditions for a succesfully operational business plan, and served to intensify the temporary depression of the Losers, who "rate the loss amongst the worst" in their association.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the business of acquiring a significant share of the meagre turnover analysts observed transpiring on the board, and compounded it with the minimisation of the Losers' efficiency at aligning the means of production with the most manageable of targets.
Second Quarter: capitalising on the oppourtunity afforded them, the Winners managed to continue the slow returns of the board, which served to supply the Losers' creditors with the probability of a depression resulting from the overall interest lost by analysts during the impending recession.
Third Quarter: the Winners, in one single quarter, managed to double the size and scope of the margin they had acquired over two consecutive quarters, which was due to the Losers' incompetence at the board level, aligned to the performance of their distributions and property management.
Fourth Quarter: delivering the overall gain that creditors required to maintain interest, the Winners acquired their margin despite the dwindling turnover of their board, and the Losers management of the surge in confidence produced by the enterprise of their industry, and poorly managed actions.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast the margin the people in their organisation managed would generate a significant growth in confidence in their business, which reversed the trend the Losers had managed in building interest, which they admitted was "pretty costly" in the overall scheme.
First Quarter: the Winners activated creditors' accounts of their competitors' poorly delivered measures through their sluggish industry and poorly manufactured entries which lent the credit passed on to the Losers' creditors a large loss of interest in their own thriving business of manufacturing fraudulent accounts.
Second Quarter: stimulated by the accelerating returns the Winners registered on the board, creditors rewarded them with a surging rate of interest, and passed on the information to observers that the Losers generated a deficit from a large loss that had their creditors assessing a bail out plan during the recession.
Third Quarter: the Winners extended their margin and, according to the accounts, provided dividends for observers through a share of the manufacture of their numbers which made the job the Losers were employed in - to generate a sustainable continuum from the interest analysts placed in their business - hard work.
Fourth Quarter: dwindling interest in accurate accounts generated a loss of raw material for analysts to generate more credit for the Winners than the measures they took to disable the Losers in their bid to takeover their competitors through the manufacture of turnover on the board, which failed to eventuate.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the product of their gain to the resurgent consistency of the output manufactured by their massive targets which added value to the assertions of analysts that the Losers struggle to maintain control of their competitors' class going forward, which is an accurate assessment of a liability.
First Quarter: the Winners capitalised on their ownership of the means of production by securing a significant share of the board's business through the delivery of the goods. The Losers manufactured limited partnership as their stagnant business slumped to significant losses as the class in their structure struggled with itself.
Second Quarter: developing new resources proved profittable for the Winners who managed to hold on to a significant proportion of their gains after their industry slumped, fractionally. An early surge fom the Losers gave remaining creditors a boost in their interest as the deficit was slashed only to later be reinstated on the board.
Third Quarter: the Winners, once the recession had eased, negotiated any of their competitors' increase in output with the competent management of the means and the distribution of manufacture. The Losers failed to produce the goods and warranted observers transferring their interest to more viable options in the future.
Fourth Quarter: due to a positive outlook across the board and an individualistic pursuit of partnership, the Winners forged ahead with the advantage they managed on the board. The negative outlook of observers given value, the Losers struggled with their lack of hard-working business and a distinct lack of accounting for their competitors.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attempted to defraud observers through a scheme to apportion a lack of productivity from their targets as the cause for their diminished margin. The Losers gave an account of their loss that amounted to a lack of responsible ownership of the results of their lack of industry and classless structure.
First Quarter: the Losers' shortage of enterprise, which was compounded by a lack of interest and vision, gave observers reason to manage their credit with severe caution. The Winners took moderate risks that placed undue pressure on their competitor's unsustainable running of their business and forced analysts to give them credit for the gain.
Second Quarter: taking advantage of the low interest of their competitors, the Losers increased productivity in the initial exchanges with their systemised operations. The Winners exploited their low overheads and unrealistic targets during a contraction of their margin and managed to regain their significant advantage by minimising productivity.
Third Quarter: the Losers capitalised on the recession by increasing their investment in industry to manage their deficit despite the lack of vision, ingenuity and rampant excess. The Winners lent a small fortune to the uncertainty of their creditors with a loss of interest in their enterprising schemes and the surge in their competitor's gain.
Fourth Quarter: many observers gave the Losers credit for their decline in productivity at the board-level which increased the demand for greater output from their targets. The Winners gave their creditors continued confidence with the advantages their shared intrerest in primarily individualistic goals sought to gain, and did gain.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers faced questions about their trading in insecure targets and attributed their loss to the loss of confidence and lack of options, which creditors bought. The Winners gave their creditors a performance that added value to the perception of future gains, which amounts to a loss, after the real value is factored in.
MY CHILDHOOD POETRY HERO
I lived in a house as a youngster and did not get any affection from my maternal aunt. But I would tie cats together by the tail and hang them over the washing line and then I would read some exsquisitely sensitive sonnets from the pen of T.S Eliot. There was a stupidity and artistry about his play "Murder in the Cathedral" that appealed to me.
MY CHILDHOOD PROSE HERO
I was 12 years old when the priests first started to lose interest in my hairless rectum. It has to be the most devastating experience of my life. I had the pleasure of playing with their dangly bits when they wound up reading Thomas Aquinas to me late at night and I only developed a rash around my chin from resting things on it.
MY IDEA OF THE PERFECT POET
For the big occasion, such as an undisturbed sleep, I would have to select William Shakespeare. He always saved a lot of money from collecting more from people with less. The finest writer in the English language that I have read is definitely August Strindberg and Gore Vidal is gay.
MY IDEA OF THE PERFECT PROSE WRITER
Victor Hugo and Eugene Delacroix are very close to death. Both were exceptionally alive when the blood in them was in liquid form and had the abiltiy to carry oxygen in it, which their brain required to keep their heart pumping blood to their brain, not to mention their penis and rectum.
FOR THE RECORD
Patrick Smith was born between his mother's legs after an accident with a knitting needle. He has scored some quite hideous women, has thrown up in his socks and has eaten his own underwear. He led a succesful revolt against his local member for parliament and is acknowledged as a dangerous sex offender. Known to his numerous lovers as "Mr. Fiddles", he scored one kindergarten-goer when his guardian wasn't watching. His highest erection has been measured against his foot, favourably.
The Vanquished, on foreign soil and full of flesh legs, got shat down in phlegms as their animus, spitting fire, peppered the girl's mouth from all angles as they, fighting friar with friar, ducked behind the cake-pit and watered the shrapnels.
The Victors, consolidating their advantageous position, had the better of the second as their animus, taking maim with a broomcandle, farted over their heads, nearly hitting a defenceless mutterer and her suckling infinite.
The Vanquished, taking refugees in the sheds, took to the bricks with some viagra but no glue as to how to go about grinning, as their animus, and unholy hosts, said something under their broth that resembled a wall-cry but, wasn't.
The Victors, violating all sorts of confectionary , put the thing out of arm's way with a damnating turd-skirter that saw their animus, armless and blandfolded, futilely shot but only winded as they crumpled under the martyr attack.
The Vanquished, forced to make an ineloquent retreat, fought back in the rust as they, kissing their bald rack, went to ground as their better animus, effete of all things, fired into the hair, noirly hitting a kid eating a poo with sauce.
The Santas, a nude awful wink, have latched themselves into the fart with a nounless word over the Bumblers - unreliable to pelt a plopper chide on the blur, for the spate of anchovies.
The Bumblers, feeling a side short of its breast, fretted at the speight of their lunch going, why? the Santas, fat-end firing, spied on the girls, as they swept, and sat their, thinking.
Their thoughts clausing their arse to tar up, the Santas walked up to the scarred bard and licked it in the arse; as they did, the Bumblers, blurbed up, because of the Cassius cuts.
The Bumblers, for all the thrushings they've clopped, have had, warily, a motherless saying; justice, the Santas, baited from pillow to paste by the prissy, have equalled a doubled chins!
The Santas, thinks to munch, get, now, to shave their top lap to cuss the Coots in a dripper! The Bumblers, on the and of their drips, will spend the simmer on the trick, to poke up a little.
Despair at the late lips of consternation, the Dullblogs, weaving their vowels in their whack, make wince-meat of the Bumblers, whimpered by the spite of ineffabilities, for fork's ache.
Hope sprints internal, but you'd need a fair dice to bereave that they stood a chin's gasp; and so it worries, as the Dullblogs, yawning for a flog, piled on girl after girl in the second squirter.
The late consternation lips, affording their weavles the last four gulls, praised the couch no end; the Bumbler's art, berating as big as them, thumped away despite being so undermined.
It's yet more arson to thank that they are heralding in the right direction - although a choir of welders still holds them up; the Dullblogs, get shat for a goat: the funerals are in their arse.
Nuffer's fear! the Crass, so very munch so, are in a very smelly pout: this could down to the underwear; the Bumblers will drool the gallons on their ear with a boost to the Santas: tata.
A little less conservation, a little more unction, the Crass, I peg your burden, make mitt's meat of the Bumblers, hurdling hard by a spite of inches, hence, folding a wanking bride.
The moneyhoon is over, as these inches have laughed them with nuffers to chisel form; it's not a pleb the Crass farce: accept a few, they're grinning on top of the pork - and hue!
Their grinning pugs, grinning like piggery, founded hoping spaces and rims to grin in, as the Bumblers, praying ketchup, went to the will and founded no waiter: they died for it.
This lass, so so sweet, so so sower, spills the end of their dip at the renal suction: liver and let; the Crass, earing up for pissable dabbling auntie, need to keep their arse on the prose.
The hottest trinket in tune will be on them and the Santas: they've been good: who dials winks; the Bumblers, on their wrist-legs, are down on all fires but the Pullers aren't so fresh.
Add Comments
Comments (5)