Round 9, 2009, West Coast lost to Collingwood
First Quarter: the Winners were willing to supply creditors with the goods, despite the figures the board showed to observers which clearly had them managing a deficit, as the Losers, business going to plan, negotiated initial uncertainty on home soil to attain the position on the board they sought.
Second Quarter: reversing the ownership of the deficit, the Winners went into the deep recession trading their labour for the price of a monopoly of the board, which the Losers, guaranteed a nasty depression, managed to turnover as their individual enterprise cost them a share of the board's move.
Third Quarter: the Winners added a second consecutive quarter of growth after the recession ended, which allowed them to build confidence in their abilities despite the taxing effects, as the Losers, going from the last recession into another one, managed to supply a depression for analysts.
Fourth Quarter: securing the outcome they managed due to the position they took on the board, the Winners demanded an increase in levels of trust from creditors going forward, which the Losers, gaining assistance from their poor abilities, added to their mortgage on divisions devoid of class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the generation of a deserved outcome to the successful implementation of a plan they had devised to manufacture a favourable return, which the Losers met by accounting for the loss as a by-product of the sub-standard work-ethic they managed to produce.
Second Quarter: reversing the ownership of the deficit, the Winners went into the deep recession trading their labour for the price of a monopoly of the board, which the Losers, guaranteed a nasty depression, managed to turnover as their individual enterprise cost them a share of the board's move.
Third Quarter: the Winners added a second consecutive quarter of growth after the recession ended, which allowed them to build confidence in their abilities despite the taxing effects, as the Losers, going from the last recession into another one, managed to supply a depression for analysts.
Fourth Quarter: securing the outcome they managed due to the position they took on the board, the Winners demanded an increase in levels of trust from creditors going forward, which the Losers, gaining assistance from their poor abilities, added to their mortgage on divisions devoid of class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the generation of a deserved outcome to the successful implementation of a plan they had devised to manufacture a favourable return, which the Losers met by accounting for the loss as a by-product of the sub-standard work-ethic they managed to produce.
