First Quarter: the Winners implemented the organisation of their group around the movements of the competition and managed to make a substantial dividend for their share, which the Losers had no option to minimise as they attempted to get their business going across the board, going forward.
Second Quarter: the margin they managed contracting, the Winners laboured to generate enterprise going into a deep recession, which they managed with a margin, as the Losers, their business up and running, slashed their deficit in a protected environment, and looked the goods, indeed.
Third Quarter: the Winners, struggling to extend the class in their system, suffered a second consecutive quarter of contraction to the deficit they managed for the Losers, which allowed them to deliver a massive boost in confidence to their poor creditors, many of whom deserved to be paid out.
Fourth Quarter: following the last recession, the Winners lost yet more of the gains they had made in earlier exchanges, which proved ample in the overall scheme, as the Losers, negotiating without the benefit of their full entitlements, put a viable plan in place to garner good interest, in the future.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to make the ever decreasing margin they managed into a lesson in educating their personnel across the board, which the Losers met with a poor attempt to pass their account off as a means to make themselves liable to be truthful, and avoided a hefty pay out.
First Quarter: the Losers, limited in their options going forward, managed a massive depression which was a continuation of the crisis they have endured in a period when confidence is low, which the Winners, employing an open environment going forward, managed to exploit sufficiently.
Second Quarter: restricting the competition through aligning all their figures, the Losers managed to post another negative gain despite supplying their group some confidence in their business, which was in part due to the Winners, struggling to manage a sustainable plan, ignoring their key target.
Third Quarter: the Losers compounded the crisis they had experienced before the previous recession with another quarter to add value to the nervousness of their group, which the Winners, employing a number of options across the board, declined to exploit when they lost some sizeable interest.
Fourth Quarter: clawing back into contention for the position on the board their group desired, the Losers handed back the gains they had made in the eyes of analysts with a big loss, which the Winners managed to contribute to over the course of every single quarter, for a healthy deficit, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers failed to dispell doubts analysts have about the validity of accounts they managed, which came in the form of a fraudulent analysis of their position on the board, and added to the Winners' assertions of a bias in the industry, which dosen't hold up under analysis.
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the gloom with the benefit of the welfare provided by the size and scope of the realistic target they managed to supply opportunity to, which the Losers had no viable option to limit, as they unearthed a future option going forward, and gave a good account.
Second Quarter: in a rapid slowing down, in a slippery climate, the Winners managed to acquit themselves adequately enough to sufficiently account for the Losers, which amounted to a sign of hope for them, as they managed to limit the impact the climate had on their business, overall.
Third Quarter: the Winners suffered a dramatic turnaround of their fortunes, as the deficit they had negotiated for the Losers became their sole property, going into the last recession, as the competition evened up the conditions for trading with bold initiatives they had stolen, going forward.
Fourth Quarter: owning a realistic target which doubled as a means of protecting the advantage, the Winners stole the margin which was the rightful property of the Losers, as they had struggled to generate opportunity for their future option going forward, which had gained them some credit, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to avoid the pressure of delivering accurate accounts for the poor figures they attracted to their performance, which merely intensified the scrutiny the Losers were placed under, as they struggled to maintain some credibilty in the stability of their unity.
First Quarter: the Losers consolidated their share with an erroneous account on the board of the true worth of the performance they managed, and a gain, which the Winners, managing a reputation of slowness in early trading, restricted the impact of with the returns they managed to serve.
Second Quarter: a period of inflation of loss of interest marked the Losers' sloppy accounting practices, and a sudden and minor decrease in the deficit they managed for the Winners, which contracted due to the efficient alignment they managed in matching the means to their absolute ends.
Third Quarter: the Losers suffered a severe and savage turnaround of their fortunes in the period, as the deficit they had been managing for the Winners became their sole property, which indicated to the competition that the comparative advantage they inherited was an absolute one.
Fourth Quarter: two consecutive quarters of negative growth signalled to the Losers that a radical restructuring across the board is an absolute necessity, going forward, which the Winners created in the class they expoited going forward, and the figures they manage in their operations.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers took full responsibility for the negative outcome they managed, which they placed the majority share of to their developing resources, and declined to pay credit to the Winners, as they attempted to attribute the outcome to their management of the "slowing down".
First Quarter: the Winners opened the early trading period with a manageable distribution of the board's takeover, despite the apparent uncertainty of a certain analyst, which the Losers managed to add interest to, as they endeavoured to align their business with the competition, successfully.
Second Quarter: experiencing the pain associated with a contraction, the Winners toiled hard to add value to their business, despite the decline of their key stocks, which the Losers attempted to add extra uncertainty to, as they recorded the aspirations of their industry: owning control.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed a massive spike in the number of entries the board managed, as the environment opened up allowing the free flow of business, which the Losers also managed to take interest in, as the credit for the interest was balanced evenly, despite a growing deficit.
Fourth Quarter: a severe slow-down in industry managed to restrict the limited assets of the Winners, which generated a savage period of dissipation of confidence, and was largely due to the Losers, limited by liabilities, managing to send shockwaves through the competition's nervous system.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to account for the operations of the board's turnover, which was significant and tight, and delivered a viable account of the dynamic relationship they share with the Losers, which was reported to consist of "fear and confidence", despite the decline.
First Quarter: the Losers utilised the plan they had been managing to effectively implement, which netted them a manageable margin going into the impending recession, as the Winners, stretched going forward due to the strain on the running of some of their business, managed a short-term loss.
Second Quarter: value-adding to the turnover they managed on the board, the Losers managed to be limited by the costly practices of accounting for the competition, which allowed the Winners sufficient room to negotiate a plan of attack going forward, which was feasible, and beneficial in the gloom.
Third Quarter: the Losers suffered a severe contraction of the turnover their business produced on the board, and manouvered their business into another credible loss, as the Winners, managing enough uncertainty to minimise the perception of a slump in their organisation, earned a gain.
Fourth Quarter: despite a late surge, the Losers cut the costs associated with a loss due to the industry they managed as a by-product of their strong values and integrity, which the Winners managed to negotiate as they put forward the proposal that their business going forward is poor, overall.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers urged their workers to reach viable and manageable goals after the board had finalised its position, which the Winners assessed as "priceless" despite the potential damage the size of the margin inflicted on their fraudulent claims to leading the industry, in any department.
First Quarter: the Winners attracted the interest of observers despite what the board maintained, and managed to generate a majority of the share of the board's activity, which the Losers had attempted to minimise as they struggled to create interest from their limited share of the means.
Second Quarter: guaranteed a position on the board worth their organisation, the Winners managed their business going into a recession with great expertise, which caused the Losers to experience pain going forward as they struggled to find any class going forward, as the break extended.
Third Quarter: the Winners, sluggish after the recession, struggled to add valuable points to their strategy of unrelenting industry in a structured arrangement within the industry, which the Losers managed some credit from, as they managed to stall the competition, across the board.
Fourth Quarter: secure in the advantage their strategy had managed, the Winners struggled, under the expectations of gloom, to add unsustainable growth to a certain percentage, which the Losers lost a large chunk of, in the final analysis, as their deficit blew out late in the piece, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to distribute credit for the outcome evenly going forward, owing to the substantive quality of the work their key sectors managed, which the Losers attempted to match with positive reports of the new resources they're developing to win property disputes.
First Quarter: the Losers depleted reserves of their stocks in confidence, as their dwindling optimism tricked creditors into investing credit in their schemes, which the Winners, destabilized by dismantling the competition's comaparative advantage in the early trading period, managed to attract.
Second Quarter: grossly underestimating the severity of the situation, the Losers incorporated laissez-faire practices into a tight situation, and it paid off for the Winners, as it added additional value to the aggression they brought to the table going forward, across the board and going forward, overall.
Third Quarter: the Losers struggled with the business of the day as they attempted to get their model for attracting credit, but not a position on the board, back into action, which the Winners managed to restrict, though for the minority they went without, and threatened to add more pain.
Fourth Quarter: managing to inflict more pain for one observer, at least, the Losers managed the means for the majority and used it poorly as their baseless confidence dwindled away, which the Winners took for themselves as they added more value to the outcome they managed.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers "weren't able to capitalise" because they "haven't got enough class" across the board as they sought "a way to exploit" the competition, which the Winners added to the value they had managed, and valued the outcome as an opportunity to "build", going forward.
A professorially encleaned Dullbog artflirt have dug the chop over a sloth varnishing Dackers. It cleaves the Dackers with their sheds betwixt their nose, yet wince one mule.
They, swimmingly, had spooled their best tree-squirter perfumance but just licked that one moron. The Dullards, currying out their catches instinctions to the ladder, hung in there.
No tehe narrowhisper of factories, the Dullards still, to their handless chingrin, oily just tooled the pints from the Dackers, who sniffled yet another lass by a smelly margarine.
It loafs their sneezing in tidal disarray with hurtily any help of baking the filials this tim-tam abound, while for the Dullards, yet to sniffle deflate, are while on their while to the stop.
It's the Cankers who'll heave to flight their almatey run and hurtiness in a singnascient one for broth, why the Dackers can, lick a zombie, get won on the inured and strychnined Boobs.
With the Dongs' pants pridely awound their ears, the Sunnysueders have pilled off a thorough trashing of their bumbling advertizzers. The Bumblers jesus go fom stringlength to strangelength this very ear.
That they concorded meany light ones did nought fro them on the scared bard - they licked a rubble wearily. The Sinnysadders, all walls a professorial pantflirt, can wink over the medieval slides to a tuner.
The Bumblers, as medioffal as they claim, have no intestinity across the muddle and sudsly lick the gloss. Aqually sad, is that the Sinny coys stilt halve what it tickles to milk their monk in the gross for the viles.
It's huddled to steer howl they winkle milk them, bepause - evil wit haste Big Bally Whore they can still mash wrinkled pants, while tehe Dongs, merrily wrinkled pants, will have to find a new pair to wire.
Poor Poor have to farce the stringy Sinnyers in what shard be a nutter close lass for them to whinge, pout and, the Dongs, sparingly shot over the fence, heave to tie and tipple the prosemessing Taggers.
Not for not want of toying or shored foam errogenous orangement, the Cows have pipped the Emos by a canned syllable margarine. Poor Emos have no supine up the muddle of their gowned.
Stoutly licking any dog's erection, they simpering have no glue as to what the firetrack; they, shoed, be dong! The Cows, inkspiring and axespilling, knowhow to export a slide's whackiness.
They did sew - weeding down the pantless Emos with run and furnishing on the bard thanks to speciousness in the flute hat. Poor Emos minged to tie as heard by a blandman: spooly.
Only a blandman could inure winching the lipless and spoonless Emos gown about their bashfulness. The Cows, on the other hind, thinks to extraportency inside their fitty look daggermouse.
They ply the Weakies: pantshrill that one in for the fire pants, ploys! Poor Emos ply the cramprat, but desingedly doubtful, Gawkers in another deprosing affair that they'll hope to whinge.
When I'm little more than a few bones, I'll remember that the Cankers ticked off the Weakies in a clots furnish. The Weakies had licked good things for munch of tit.
When I'm no more than dust, we'll say safetily that the Weakies held the wimp but couldn't get past the Proust in tomb. The Cankers just keep scratching: a way.
When I'm the dust up your nose, you'll sniff and stay: the Cankers, thanks to their ladder chips, took the pants while the Weakies licked away to no afail at least.
When I say so, it's cartons for the Weakies this ear but not before they've dunced their dish. Conversantly, the Cankers are hanging onto the rim of the factual ones.
Dullbogs bewarts, for the Cankers are never out of my nostril and Cows take art, beclause you warrant flounder it topical to shunt drown the Weakies in the wets.
Tinkers a growl brisket eelily, the Loins have pilled the punts off the slipless Boobs at the Telecom Dome in fount of a cloud. The Boobs pilled them back on later.
Sinus a flu coy ployers, thy Bobbies piffled hardily late but couldn't milk mounds for their pour stint. It was the simian old simian, for the Loins were on sarong.
They, so expedient in all flatuses, bloke the thong apron thinks to their big ape in the frontal hat, at a time when the Boobs couldn't gland a tickle to stave themloafs.
It leaves one wandering if they can even throaten the finals whereoveralls, the Loins look to have the mustered to be mire than wimpering to voucher in the stain.
We'll know mire after they do paddle with the Taints who'll snuggle to goad class. The Boobs will be praying they can hold, doff and courtesy againts the Dackers.
Jammed eelily, the Clatters have slid plaster the Taggers in a conical perforation at the cheese. The Taggers were flairform degreased.
Bottling hold abound the pal and with the big Bullboy bulging with blisters, the Taggers read for much but could oily squealch as the Clatters wriggled awry.
Kempt on earth by the son of God, the Clatters wriggled hard as a eunuch to uberpower their reekier advertisers, who still trialled shandily.
The Taggers are swifly batter than leverage this ear and halve punty to hinge their arses on, while the lass sludged about the Clatters soso much the bleater.
They trickle the Woulds in what looms as a kittenplucking great, mates. The Taggers fleece the Dongs in a noughtminge for the natives, sure.
Add Comments
Comments (4)