Round 7, 2009, Collingwood lost to Saint Kilda
First Quarter: the Winners withstood the pressure of the competition, and managed to restrict the severity of the damage the impact of the share they managed of the means had, which the Losers, virtually controlled for the majority, as they went forward with unsubstantiated optimism, and a loss.
Second Quarter: generating cohesion from savagery in conflict, the Winners capitalised on the capital liabilities of the competition with an absolute takeover of the board, which left the Losers, struggling to account for the competition, headed for a major recession, with a deep depression.
Third Quarter: the Winners added more value to the demands of creditors as they continued to disadvantage the competition, going forward and across the board, which maintained the depression for the Losers, as they managed to offer their creditors signs of interest, despite the gloom.
Fourth Quarter: manufacturing a fourth consecutive quarter of unprecedented gains, the Winners valued integrity over their position on the board, which they managed anyway, despite the Losers, battlers in a crisis, adding value to the perception of incompetence of personnel, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed their accounts effectively as they highlighted "the big business" they operate in, and the discrepancies between analysts and "work ethic", which was more than the Losers could manage, after key statements about the outcome they managed went missing.
Second Quarter: generating cohesion from savagery in conflict, the Winners capitalised on the capital liabilities of the competition with an absolute takeover of the board, which left the Losers, struggling to account for the competition, headed for a major recession, with a deep depression.
Third Quarter: the Winners added more value to the demands of creditors as they continued to disadvantage the competition, going forward and across the board, which maintained the depression for the Losers, as they managed to offer their creditors signs of interest, despite the gloom.
Fourth Quarter: manufacturing a fourth consecutive quarter of unprecedented gains, the Winners valued integrity over their position on the board, which they managed anyway, despite the Losers, battlers in a crisis, adding value to the perception of incompetence of personnel, going forward.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed their accounts effectively as they highlighted "the big business" they operate in, and the discrepancies between analysts and "work ethic", which was more than the Losers could manage, after key statements about the outcome they managed went missing.
