Round 7, 2009, Carlton lost to Fremantle
First Quarter: the Losers generated a small deficit from the business they managed in a climate conducive to slippery transactions, which created a share of pain for workers, as the Winners, managing to inspire confidence from within their organisation, settled on a viable plan of action going forward.
Second Quarter: managing to slide into the deep recession with a marked disadvantage, the Losers struggled to generate value from its workers, which proved costly, as the Winners, implementing savage industry, negotiated the impending recession with a series of expensive measures, for the period.
Third Quarter: the Losers manufactured another quarter of negative growth in their deficit, despite control of the means, which generated severe confidence in a crisis, as the Winners, manufacturing productivity from limited opportunity, negotiated the surge in property losses, with another gain.
Fourth Quarter: securing a slight gain for an overall deficit, the Losers managed to create uncertainty in the viability of their industry as liabilities became abundantly evident, which the Winners managed to highlight in the final account they gave of their willingness to work for each other, like socialists.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed their outcome to the slow transfer of property they managed going forward, and poor measures " that really hurt us across the board,” which was in marked contrast to the Winners, as they revelled in optimism they generated from the desired outcome.
Second Quarter: managing to slide into the deep recession with a marked disadvantage, the Losers struggled to generate value from its workers, which proved costly, as the Winners, implementing savage industry, negotiated the impending recession with a series of expensive measures, for the period.
Third Quarter: the Losers manufactured another quarter of negative growth in their deficit, despite control of the means, which generated severe confidence in a crisis, as the Winners, manufacturing productivity from limited opportunity, negotiated the surge in property losses, with another gain.
Fourth Quarter: securing a slight gain for an overall deficit, the Losers managed to create uncertainty in the viability of their industry as liabilities became abundantly evident, which the Winners managed to highlight in the final account they gave of their willingness to work for each other, like socialists.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed their outcome to the slow transfer of property they managed going forward, and poor measures " that really hurt us across the board,” which was in marked contrast to the Winners, as they revelled in optimism they generated from the desired outcome.
