Round 6, 2009, Richmond lost to Sydney
First Quarter: the Winners, served richly by their greatest asset: accountability in a contracting environment, managed to gain control of the positon on the board they bargained for, which put the Losers in the position of negotiating the recession with a plan to improve, or modify, their business.
Second Quarter: maintaining the position they had managed, and making minor gains across the board, the Winners negotiated the prospect of a major recession with another quarter, which the Losers made into another deficit, because the people in their organisation are of a poorer class.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed the period before the last recession with a loss that threatened to rob them of confidence, and potentially the absolute advantage, which the Losers had to take credit for, due to the surge they managed to produce from their industry and business dealings.
Fourth Quarter: managing to keep their interest in holding the position on the board they had managed, the Winners held on to control of the margin and added more value, despite a surge from the Losers, which took them to the brink of disaster as they got their business up and running, finally.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to transfer the responsibilty for the size of their margin to a shortfall in accurate measures taken in early trading, which sufficiently balanced with the account the Losers managed, and generally served to dupe observers into holding off on large payouts.
Second Quarter: maintaining the position they had managed, and making minor gains across the board, the Winners negotiated the prospect of a major recession with another quarter, which the Losers made into another deficit, because the people in their organisation are of a poorer class.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed the period before the last recession with a loss that threatened to rob them of confidence, and potentially the absolute advantage, which the Losers had to take credit for, due to the surge they managed to produce from their industry and business dealings.
Fourth Quarter: managing to keep their interest in holding the position on the board they had managed, the Winners held on to control of the margin and added more value, despite a surge from the Losers, which took them to the brink of disaster as they got their business up and running, finally.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed to transfer the responsibilty for the size of their margin to a shortfall in accurate measures taken in early trading, which sufficiently balanced with the account the Losers managed, and generally served to dupe observers into holding off on large payouts.
I agree that Richmond are of a poorer class. I'm surprised they haven't tried totalitarianism. It works.
Consumption Malfunction
Equal and Opposite
Arses and Elbows
Footy Power
Richmond used to be good. Now if anyone of any class shows signs of having problems with their hammy they do their best to make sure they do it, for good.
Remind me not to go into a Richmond doctor's complaining of soreness behind the ribbing. I'll be damned if I'm going to hell, just yet.