First Quarter: the Winners managed to negotiate the difficult climate and savage impact of the gloom on the business of manufacturing with a marginal gain, as the Losers attracted widespread payouts from observers for the meagre returns they managed to deliver to their creditors on the board.
Second Quarter: as the conditions continued, the Winners nearly doubled their margin with another gain, brought on by a complete monopolisation of the means for doing business, which was added to by the Losers, compensating for the classless structure they have developed over time.
Third Quarter: the Winners resumed business immediately after the recession with a small gain, which threatened to create interest for observers and offered encouraging signs for the Losers, managing to stall the damage two consecutive quarters of losses had done, going into the last recession.
Fourth Quarter: increasing the gloom of the business of the day, the Winners produced another quarter consistent with their others and took an overall margin from a small loss, as the Losers, aligning their performance to the conditions, flooded the board with productive turnover, and a gain.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners admitted to analysts that they had failed to manage the difficult climate, and "struggled" with the strategies the competition had employed to negate the flow of their business, which is paying the Losers excessive credit for a mediocre peformance across the board.
First Quarter: the Losers generated, in a protected environment, cautious pessimism from creditors about the future of what limited options they could manage, as the Winners, benefiting from rebounding figures, managed to capitalise on their surging confidence and enterpising outlook.
Second Quarter: relinquishing the momentary monopoly of turnover at board-level, the Losers spiralled towards the impending recession, despite the manufacture of fraudulent volatility, which added value to the assessments the Winners had made that their stocks are on the rise, going forward.
Third Quarter: the Losers, following two consecutive quarters of negative results and a recession, failed to manufacture sustainable future options to account for their industry, as the Winners delivered creditors, passing themselves off as analysts, confidence in their margin.
Fourth Quarter: after the last recession, the Losers managed to generate interest from creditors that the business of acquiring an absolute advantage was within their scope, which failed to eventuate, as the Winners, increasing the confidence placed in their industry, added a gain, again.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to transfer some of the credit away from the competition by calling on incidents of mismanagement of maintaining control on the board, which detracted from the resourceful and enterprising business the Winners bargained for in acquiring credit for their control.
First Quarter: the Winners maximised the advantage they had managed through the minimisation of the costly business of negotiating the competition, as the Losers maximised their disadvantage, in the gloomy conditions, with excessive mismanagement of what opportunity they could manage.
Second Quarter: as the conditions met the forecasts, the Winners generated an excessive margin from operating their business of maintaining control of their monopoly, which generated the prospect of a depression for the Losers, after they experienced two consecutive quarters of negativity.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to consolidate their advantage in the conditions, and generated a significant shortfall of interest from neutral observers, which the Losers, struggling to generate opportunity for the small percentage of class in their structure, paid for, going backwards.
Fourth Quarter: as the gloom generated liquidity in the climate, the Winners continued their miserly approach to the competition and benefitted from a return to productivty, as the Losers produced an account of their organisation, which generated a severe depression for creditors and observers.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attempted to defraud analysts into investing excessive interest in credit for their result to resources they had inherited, which paid small credit to the effective business the Losers manufactured in engineeering an outlook of better returns, going forward with optimism.
First Quarter: the Losers met expectations of an absolute advantage, in early trading, through the gain of a margin, which they acquired at the expense of the Winners, as they endeavoured to slash the deficit they had managed after continuing the gloomy forecasts predicted for their business.
Second Quarter: experiencing a severe downturn in their industry, the Losers headed towards the major recession with a deficit which threatened to last until the close, and delivered the Winners a boost to their struggling confidence, and was aligned to a surge very few observers bargained on.
Third Quarter: the Losers, in the absence of their captain of industry, delivered creditors a deflating forecast of the class in their structure and lack of future options, which pays no credit to the Winners, who negotiated the period following the recession with a distinct margin, from booming business.
Fourth Quarter: inaccurate measures and dwindling supplies of confidence manufactured the second consecutive quarter of negative growth in the Losers' deficit, as the Winners negotiated the margin they had worked hard to accrue, and, going forward, made confidence an acquisition to bank on.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempted to generate positive accounts of their industry, despite crediting a failure to capitalise on "opportunity" for their inequalities at board-level, as the Winners negotiated the terms with a slippery account of their position, in terms of the people in their business.
First Quarter: the Winners took ownwership of the board through the rapid minimisation of the liability in their organisation to think like millionaires in a property dispute, which met, equally, the margin the Losers generated through the poverty of class in their highly structured environment.
Second Quarter: managing to generate a sufficient abundance of inequality at board-level, the Winners managed, accurately, the means against their ultimate goals, which created substantial debts for the Losers, as any creditors they had demanded immediate returns to enterprising vision.
Third Quarter: the Winners, managing to restrict the impact the expected surge from the competition would produce, went into the last minor recession with a massive margin, which the Losers, after two consecutive quarters of negative results, managed to make of only fractionally less daunting magnitude.
Fourth Quarter: working towards gaining confidence, the Winners endeavoured to retain the advantage they had acquired, and absolutely did so, as the Losers, settling down to give a more accurate account of the discrepancies in class across the board, made their deficit acceptable to creditors.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the advantage their workers had acquired to the enterprising attitude passed on to them from higher up in their organisation, which added value to assessments of the Losers that without a rapidly contracting environment they manage to lose effectiveness.
First Quarter: the Losers incorporated productivity into their stagnant business in the difficult climate, which made turnover at board-level a difficult prospect, managing to restrict the Winners from returns that creditors could appreciate with interest, in passing themselves off as analysts.
Second Quarter: aligning their performance to the conditions, the Losers went into the recession, following two consecutive quarters, with a deficit to negotiate, which accounted for the margin the Winners had acquired through the discrepancies the board indicated to observers and analysts.
Third Quarter: the Losers generated interest from analysts with a turnaround after the recession, which delivered their organisation sizeable and unsustainable gains, as the Winners managed some sizeably sustainable stagnation in productivity, and then declined with interest in gloomy conditions, as forecast.
Fourth Quarter: as forecast by analysts, the Losers managed a decline in productivity which the board indicated was costly to the operations of their business, and guaranteed the Winners a reverse of the previous quarter's results, which managed to expel, in the short-term, negative forecasts.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempted to sell fraudulent creditors inaccurate accounts of the operations of their business going forward, which paid off, in the short-term, as the Winners attempted to attribute ownership of their acquisition to their core values of leadership and focus, and managed.
First Quarter: the Winners consolidated the gloomy conditions with a margin that analysts forecast would remain until the close of trading, and was due to the Losers managing to maintain the demand for advantage, which was negotiated despite the wealth of contracting supply.
Second Quarter: manufacturing sizeable returns from their interest in enterprise going forward, the Winners rewarded creditors with sufficient enough gains to break even, which was assisted by the Losers' industry slowing down across the board, and poor options, in terms of realistic targets.
Third Quarter: the Winners gambled with the opportunities their industry earned them, which gave a poor account of the discrepancies in the willingness for work, if not class, between they and the Losers, who managed, through a late and fortunate rally, to gain some valuable confidence.
Fourth Quarter: in the gloom, the Winners surged late to give an accurate account of their advantage over the competition, which they managed after some slippery deals, and the Losers' poor management of transferring ownership of the means of production into an absolute advantage.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners paid credit for their margin to their core values which they attributed as supplying the conditions for a succesfully operational business plan, and served to intensify the temporary depression of the Losers, who "rate the loss amongst the worst" in their association.
First Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficiency of assets in the current climate by managing to squander, going forward, the comparative advantage of the situation, which managed to defer the transfer of credit, acquired through the discipline of their organisation, to the Winners, until now.
Second Quarter: the grim assessments of the board compounded the stagnant productivity of the Losers with the liabilty of their excessive individualism, which was accelerated by the structured industry of the Winners delivering a productive return from the manufacture of opportunity.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to stall the advancing excess of the competition through the manageable acquisition of opportunity and no small amount of fortune, as the Winners negotiated the expected surge in the competition, which was managed securely by the business of their discipline.
Fourth Quarter: the poverty of their account stimulated the Losers sufficiently to manage only the smallest of losses for a substantial overall deficit, which was an indication of the effect that two consecutive quarters of massive gains on the board, aligned to performance, delivered the Winners, initially.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers failed to supply analysts with credible accounts of their shortfall through the excessive attribution of credit to their competition, which served as an accurate account of the discrepancy between them and the Winners, who managed to acquit their business accurately.
The Poor have regicide their first wing of this so soon after folding off a light climb-back from their Wet Coats ruffles. Hat they wear rumple to hopen up sinch a large margarine as they dud was licky.
The Poor's key ployers stirred up hand their smelly flowers were ample to italicize on their damnation, scarring at wail, summingly. The Coaters hand no anchor, nought fart the past time toot.
That they grained some bespectabilty from a fasting propellery want clout form munch in their arse. While the Poor, disparate for, and richly deversing off, a wing will take glut plod from their wank.
Rarely the Poor deverse to half at least one wang all ruddy and could gaunt some moo. The sane can't be head for the wince matey Coaters, who lock a shudder off their famer salves without any laughed.
The Poor have gaunt the Stains to content wit where they can take fool vantage of their zippy ball scurriers, while the Weakos have the Dillbogs in what limbs as a carcass they'll lack to loose.
The Taggers and the Dullbogs have fraught trout aha-snoring draw at Telecom Dome before patient fangs. Neither slide got the chocolates but nuffer dud they gaunt the broiled lorries, so hints snored, bud.
Blithe whites, the Tags should half winced bat the Dullies never cave-in and were ample to rake something away from a dysappointing effect. The Tags will veal that they shard have taken the fool pounce.
Nuffer the less, they'll be hippy with the manor in which they mistook the gimp to their more eyely fancy hope-donuts. The Togs will be ruling a messed op at what you'd thank a racier wrinkled slide than they.
It moans thwat can't resist at any stagger or they'll get the very sane; hordeness is what they musk simply. The Taggers have shown a snuff spit after gagging spitcanned to sow speeds of drought in eeryone.
The Dulldags tickle on the swigging Weako sinner game they mustwin or ulcer, while the Tags will neat to be foal of rumming and flood to stamp the rompant Gawkers in again they'll do wail to get glass.
The Boobwigglers have taken the quake aghast a dyspirited Emos outfit by a margarine not trowelly indicative of what took pants. That milks two wings on the trout for the insurgent Boob's outfit.
They startled brightly slimming on eerily ones before the Emos threw mumblers behind the pill. It was a tic-tac that saw the Boobs slip and the Emos tank fool vantage of their damnation with a load.
It took a Mallee to root the Emos. A nail in invulving a few ployers sparkled the Boobs who pimply hampered home girls at wail to tank in a shandy weed at the mine brick. The load proffed divisive.
The wing, on the black of their scalp, shoes how resilent the Boobs are on their ladder. Inversely, the Emos lassed tears for the crater point of the yore and will be pining heaps for some laugh and gaggles.
The Boobjigglers will get another shoe at tying to pray a hand game when they mate the Cows in a god toast for pith, wherehats the Emos will half their walk-cat out vases the matey Loins away.
The Gawkers have wince again paved their metal with a thralling wan over their Loins. Coming as it dud away frown harm, the ink was airspatially swat. The loss hearts the loins budly.
Spareheads for bath slides were on flair with the Gawkers mean in the scare just shodding his Loin cunterpart. It wears any other bag for the sapperstar who has sent the world on fire.
The wink, without drought, has blackened airy doubt for the Loins who just can't strung any wings together. The Gawkers will tank plenty from yet annointer win away frown their homes.
They look like they cod go wall the way, this so soon. Stilt a bag from deep in their back halights their deficiency in profundity. Whorepants, the Loins lactate to be muddle of the roadhorse.
Gawks will ploy their tray aghast a massfiring Taggers tame and will be looking to keep them quaint, while the Loins tickle the Emos on their own haddock and will be lacking to pounce black.
Naught has token out the Moggies in a frankfurt realty check for the ladder. The wink was shard earned and foal of the true chinboner spit. The loss stinks poundly for their fancy foes after last wake.
A scalpy affair punctuated by skinful forwards, the game hopened up in a flea-frowning last quart with many coals being hoped on, and both seeds looking to explose the otter's prattleness.
The Muddies looked to have the thong whipped up only knotty. They frowned that a load that piled on was whipped away in the brink of a nigh. The Cankers half a nuffer say die altitude too.
This wink makes thinks look could for the Woes who rarely are handwanking, while for the Muddies this lass could have naught come at a hearse time; pack to pack lasses always smells.
The Cankers will next tie and shoutdine the bottling Sinnysitters in a real taste for both, while, but before, the Maddies will bray looking to time one on aghast the nappy Arse-end-done.
The Cows have counted for the Dackers in a hopeful dispirin for heartache snufferers that saw the hole team play uninspilling foodbrawl aghast their obstetrician's even lass harpful stale off ply.
From what I can canker, the Cows blithered the pill while the Dackers had their pints down but stale cold naught furnish them off. They blinked out to a heady lead and then winched as it was whited away.
Thinks to massing some arsey shunts in front of gal, the Cows allayed the Dackers to put some pleasure on latte, but to no afail as the game was tidied up blithe tic-tacs and a little bit of toe.
Both slides look laughed-years away from the prose but the Cows are closer, in my ruminations. They have at least some guts with which to burn the crass and cramp all overt their opposition.
They tickle the Matey Boos in Malborn in a trickling game that will gift them more waries that in recent mammory, while the Dackers will need some elastic and a pelt to keep them up aghast the Clatters.
Add Comments
Comments (15)