Round 5, 2009, Port Adelaide lost to Saint Kilda
First Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficiency of assets in the current climate by managing to squander, going forward, the comparative advantage of the situation, which managed to defer the transfer of credit, acquired through the discipline of their organisation, to the Winners, until now.
Second Quarter: the grim assessments of the board compounded the stagnant productivity of the Losers with the liabilty of their excessive individualism, which was accelerated by the structured industry of the Winners delivering a productive return from the manufacture of opportunity.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to stall the advancing excess of the competition through the manageable acquisition of opportunity and no small amount of fortune, as the Winners negotiated the expected surge in the competition, which was managed securely by the business of their discipline.
Fourth Quarter: the poverty of their account stimulated the Losers sufficiently to manage only the smallest of losses for a substantial overall deficit, which was an indication of the effect that two consecutive quarters of massive gains on the board, aligned to performance, delivered the Winners, initially.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers failed to supply analysts with credible accounts of their shortfall through the excessive attribution of credit to their competition, which served as an accurate account of the discrepancy between them and the Winners, who managed to acquit their business accurately.
Second Quarter: the grim assessments of the board compounded the stagnant productivity of the Losers with the liabilty of their excessive individualism, which was accelerated by the structured industry of the Winners delivering a productive return from the manufacture of opportunity.
Third Quarter: the Losers managed to stall the advancing excess of the competition through the manageable acquisition of opportunity and no small amount of fortune, as the Winners negotiated the expected surge in the competition, which was managed securely by the business of their discipline.
Fourth Quarter: the poverty of their account stimulated the Losers sufficiently to manage only the smallest of losses for a substantial overall deficit, which was an indication of the effect that two consecutive quarters of massive gains on the board, aligned to performance, delivered the Winners, initially.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers failed to supply analysts with credible accounts of their shortfall through the excessive attribution of credit to their competition, which served as an accurate account of the discrepancy between them and the Winners, who managed to acquit their business accurately.
