Round 5, 2009, Collingwood lost to Essendon
First Quarter: the Winners consolidated the gloomy conditions with a margin that analysts forecast would remain until the close of trading, and was due to the Losers managing to maintain the demand for advantage, which was negotiated despite the wealth of contracting supply.
Second Quarter: manufacturing sizeable returns from their interest in enterprise going forward, the Winners rewarded creditors with sufficient enough gains to break even, which was assisted by the Losers' industry slowing down across the board, and poor options, in terms of realistic targets.
Third Quarter: the Winners gambled with the opportunities their industry earned them, which gave a poor account of the discrepancies in the willingness for work, if not class, between they and the Losers, who managed, through a late and fortunate rally, to gain some valuable confidence.
Fourth Quarter: in the gloom, the Winners surged late to give an accurate account of their advantage over the competition, which they managed after some slippery deals, and the Losers' poor management of transferring ownership of the means of production into an absolute advantage.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners paid credit for their margin to their core values which they attributed as supplying the conditions for a succesfully operational business plan, and served to intensify the temporary depression of the Losers, who "rate the loss amongst the worst" in their association.
Second Quarter: manufacturing sizeable returns from their interest in enterprise going forward, the Winners rewarded creditors with sufficient enough gains to break even, which was assisted by the Losers' industry slowing down across the board, and poor options, in terms of realistic targets.
Third Quarter: the Winners gambled with the opportunities their industry earned them, which gave a poor account of the discrepancies in the willingness for work, if not class, between they and the Losers, who managed, through a late and fortunate rally, to gain some valuable confidence.
Fourth Quarter: in the gloom, the Winners surged late to give an accurate account of their advantage over the competition, which they managed after some slippery deals, and the Losers' poor management of transferring ownership of the means of production into an absolute advantage.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners paid credit for their margin to their core values which they attributed as supplying the conditions for a succesfully operational business plan, and served to intensify the temporary depression of the Losers, who "rate the loss amongst the worst" in their association.
