First Quarter: the Winners managed to acquire viable confidence from a small advantage, gained after negotiating the loss of a deficit, which the Losers had acquired through the management of the property in their possession, and relinquished at a considerable cost to their organisation.
Second Quarter: maintaining the enterprise that had generated their margin, the Winners managed a significant and lasting advantage through positive actions from critical decisions, as the Losers headed towards the major recession considering the possibility of a depression following the deficit.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated losing ownership of the means of production through the competent management of the competition at board-level, which is where the Losers failed to align their performance and industry, as they managed to negotiate only a small increase in productivity.
Fourth Quarter: managing to maintain their advantage, the Winners experienced a nervous period associated with a surge in the competition's anxiety, which transferred to the board, and was aligned to the increasingly volatile and uncertain climate generated by the Losers' crisis of confidence.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners appreciated the value of acquiring a deserved "reward" for their "hard work" and enterprise, which built "confidence" in their business, and reversed the sentiments of the Losers, as they attempted to transfer the pressure of a crisis into the easing of a major depression.
First Quarter: the Losers contributed to the deficit they generated in an environment that made the industrial revolution they have manufactured redundant, as the Winners produced a number of industrial measures to curtail the competition, and delivered substantial rewards for creditors.
Second Quarter: in a period of rapid stagnation, the Losers managed to reverse some of the pressure their business had been under despite registering only a slight contraction of the margin, as the Winners negotiated the slashing of their margin through the individual enterprise of an unsustainable target.
Third Quarter: the Losers virtually guaranteed an optimistic outlook for the interest of positive creditors, after managing to increase the size of their margin, as the Losers closed off their options with a third consecutive quarter which managed to send creditors into ownership of a pessimistic outlook.
Fourth Quarter: in a recurrency of stagnation, the Losers managed to generate insignificant impact on their substantial deficit as the margin contracted slightly, due to the Winners, deserving the ownership of the credit for their margin, negotiating their declining interest with adequate measures.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers credited their failure to capitalise on their failure to capitalise at critical times, and refused to add value to the assessment of fraudulent creditors, which reinforced the interest the Winners managed to generate in attributing the margin to their "focus" and "committment".
First Quarter: the Winners negotiated the business of acquiring a significant share of the meagre turnover analysts observed transpiring on the board, and compounded it with the minimisation of the Losers' efficiency at aligning the means of production with the most manageable of targets.
Second Quarter: capitalising on the oppourtunity afforded them, the Winners managed to continue the slow returns of the board, which served to supply the Losers' creditors with the probability of a depression resulting from the overall interest lost by analysts during the impending recession.
Third Quarter: the Winners, in one single quarter, managed to double the size and scope of the margin they had acquired over two consecutive quarters, which was due to the Losers' incompetence at the board level, aligned to the performance of their distributions and property management.
Fourth Quarter: delivering the overall gain that creditors required to maintain interest, the Winners acquired their margin despite the dwindling turnover of their board, and the Losers management of the surge in confidence produced by the enterprise of their industry, and poorly managed actions.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast the margin the people in their organisation managed would generate a significant growth in confidence in their business, which reversed the trend the Losers had managed in building interest, which they admitted was "pretty costly" in the overall scheme.
First Quarter: the Losers managed to slash the deficit they had acquired through the early exchange period with the assistance of the pressure they applied to the board, which indicated to observers that the Winners managed to secure a significant share of the turnover with secure measures.
Second Quarter: accurate measures from developing options generated a significant reduction in the Losers' deficit, which had blown-out to unmanageable levels after the Winners managed to secure the means of production and, going forward with enterprise, capitalised with efficient processing.
Third Quarter: the Losers owned the quarter with a late rally that had halted their slide after the recession, and generated significant interest from observers that the Winners, surging with interest in productivity following the recession, might not be in a position to negotiate an absolute advantage.
Fourth Quarter: any demand observers had for a turnaround in the Losers' fortunes were slashed due to a decline in productivity, and the costly business of supplying the Winners with an incentive to demonstrate to analysts that their business is not in decline, which is currently in surplus.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers positively generated a large amount of "credit" for their performance despite the last quarter, which "would have to be described as really poor", as the Winners managed to deliver to analysts an accurate assessment of the margin, and supply creditors with optimism.
First Quarter: the Winners manufactured a comparative advantage on the board that was aligned with the performance of their targets, which they reached due to the inclination of their industry and the poverty of the Losers', which delivered damage to the aspirations of their business.
Second Quarter: recording only a minor change to their margin, the Winners went into the inevitable recession still managing to hold their competition to account, which served to accelerate the fraudulent perception the Losers held that their business was heading in the right direction.
Third Quarter: the Winners continued the relative productivity of their manufacturing, and kept the costs of going forward down due to the position their business managed, which put organisational pressure on the unsustainable, and negligible, industry of the Losers' business.
Fourth Quarter: continuing to manage the minimisation of the competition's productivity in a contracting environment, the Winners recorded a massive margin through consistently accountable practices, which reduced the Losers to welcoming the smallest turnover on the board with interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast a continuation of the acquisition of overall gains which, "Clearly you'd rather get [them] in the bank than not get [them] in the bank," which the Losers have yet to manage, as expectations of their proficiency, in terms of industry, continued to slide.
First Quarter: the Losers struggled to manufacture industry from their opportunity because, analysts observed their enterprise to be in short supply, and the Losers' control of the environment around the competition, which coexisted as the strategy to take their own business forward.
Second Quarter: employing a greater demand for industry as the strategy to get back in the game, the Losers managed to dupe analysts into giving them a forecasted advantage, which the Winners struggled to maintain, despite appearing, to some observers, to have had the initiative stolen by competitors.
Third Quarter: the Losers struggled to free up their key assets, despite the additional room in the economy that allowed those in control of the property more time for decision-making, which was directly attributable to the safe-guards the Winners employed to minimise the competition.
Fourth Quarter: the poor execution of decision-makers and the critical inaccuracies, generally, conspired to rob the Losers of the absolute advantage, which was acquired by the Winners through the radical restructuring of their strategy going forward, by way of identifying targets further afield.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers generated excessive criticism of their resources and forecast significant change, if the perceived industrial stagnation continued, which failed to give credit to the Losers, who labelled their "strategic analyst" as the reason they could exploit their competitor's interests.
First Quarter: the Winners struggled to manage the manufacturing department of realistic targets going forward, and registered a marginal deficit as the Losers stole the initiative, despite inaccurate measures costing them a greater advantage, which was expensive in the long-term.
Second Quarter: restructuring their business to meet the needs of the competition, the Winners accounted for their deficit before adding substantial value to their advantage, which generated a legitimate concern from creditors that the Losers were in the recession with a pessimistic outlook.
Third Quarter: the Winners limited the liability of their class through industry and a perpetually contracting environment to give every indication of an absolute advantage, which the Losers turned into a major depression for nervous creditors, as they turned into the last recession with a bleak forecast.
Fourth Quarter: opening the early exchange period unproductively, the Winners managed to record a small enough loss for the quarter to generate a significant continuation of their advantage over the Losers, who managed to continue to struggle to manufacture interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners managed an accurate assessment of their share of the result and applied measures to pass on credit to their "long term" options, and a share to the Losers, who negotiated the depression by attributing their position to their failure to grasp the meaning of "numerous opportunities".
First Quarter: the Losers compounded the interest of observers by recording a substantial share of the board's turnover with their productive performance, which aligned the Winners with their past performances, and provided creditors with nothing in the way of confidence going forward.
Second Quarter: defrauding observers into aligning their performance with an absolute advantage, the Losers' industry initiated a decline that would provide observers with a loss of interest, which was directly attributable to the increase in productivity provided on the board of the Winners.
Third Quarter: the Losers' decline, aligned by analysts to the pressure of their competitive environment, was not sufficiently steep enough to lose them control of the board, which the Winners continued to turnover through the accountability of their industry, and the manufacture of oppourtunity.
Fourth Quarter: in the final analysis, the Losers managed to oversee the poor management of their margin to the point of complete collapse, which was significantly aided by the Winners' management of their property going forward, and the distribution of productivity across the board, on the board.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the board's result to their failure to "capitalise on our opportunities", and the decline their industry experienced due to the slow-down, which provided the Winners with the opportunity their creditors sought to "capitalise where we didn’t in the first quarter”.
The Taggers have put the claps on the slewest slide out here: the Dunkers in what tarred out be a comfy wink. The Taggers seanced a few crickets while the Dunkers only made there's larder.
Playing a handrunning stale of ploy aghast a slow-whittled Dunkers, the Tags ran a monk with a pig scare. The Taggers platted a brined of foody that suited them down to the crowned.
With no fleas around the muddle of the grind, the Dunkers cantankerously loosed sight of the Tags who recorded one of their grandest hints. Their senor ployers had to bray stringed up, and they dud.
It'll be the same for them for the wrestle of the yore, whether they canned or not is the pint here. The Dunkers' senors look out of place, pace and acreation which is the headiest think to fanned.
The Taggers tag on the Dugs in what premises to be a flea-floating affair for four pints, while the Dunkers have their walkcat out aghast the trickling Crowes in a gimp where they half to wince.
The minty Boobbaggers have stunningly umpset the wrangling Mudpipes in a manure performance for the sages. It snapped off a winking stroke that was set to bring crate humouriliation to them.
The coin started scrapbookily with nuffer side ample to hint a tangent until a hahabrew brought bumble to the Muddies. The Poos started to get a coefficient cane growing and pant the scare on the bard.
That they arsed the pill batter and pulled greater pleasure on had a hind in the resalt. The Mudpuddles afternoon shat their pints when they did have repossession of the lather and spatchcocked a bard in the head.
It's propellerly a blimp on the reader for a quilty side and the Mudpuddles will no trout sea fatals unction this ear, while the Poos will be hopping to strangle a fume together but donut hold your broth.
They have a dangle game against the Emos, but then afairly game they ploy is a dangler, while the Muddypuddlers will get their choice at redemption aghast a differcult sect of pestulent Cankers.
The smarty frittering Gawks have shown the Crowes the door at their dank heap in a thoroughbed shoeing. The Gawkers are an hattractive side that doesn't wear any clap from the hopposition.
In a crippling despair, the Gawks stinted well with runners all over the floor and a fairied attack concreting the domination. The Crowes were ample to inksploit the Gawker's deep over the fence.
They joist couldn't get it in their afternoon enough. The Gawkers pant so much pleasure into their tickling that their lampless counterpants were left holding the bulby as they ran away with the prose.
Make no pisstake, the Crowes will have a role to ploy; this, so soon, but lick some glass across the poored, wherepants the Gawks have plaintiff going for them but still have a whackness deep.
They'll be tasted in that deportment by the Loins who hoist them at their heap in a big taste for broth slides, while, at a different time, the Crowes can get big on the bard against the sinking Dunkers.
The Poor side has gone dining at home after holding a commending load over their loiny opponents. The wink was a mammorable one for a Loins outfist that locked like it was on the skits.
That they laughed in the least carter was symphonic of the scares that the Poor sniffed losing last yore's GF so poorly. The Loins are a slide nobardy could ever swiftly rat off wiff salty.
For the Poor this is a lass that coits deep because they had the cane in hand and were readying to celibate but they let it slap and that's what haunts. The Loins will take gaunt pride.
They'll be around the monk this ear, but stale lock average in the profundis deportment, while the Poor will have to find some ployers worth a pit of mongrels so that they can flay the flag.
The Loins hoist the Gawkers in a coin toss they'll be looking to can carrotly - pimping it in dupe is the track, while the Poor truffel to the home of the Weakos in a ripe-snorter for all drowsy insomniacs.
The Sinnysiders have shouted down the low frying Weakies at the home of footy in lapsided affair that also saw Sinny star Bally Whore land in tumble. A very steroid wink that came at quiet a prose.
The Sinnysiders lock a reinjuvenated slide after a year on the skits and can lock ahead to a rearchitecturing when Bally gets whipped out. The Wet Toasters are rarely struggling to find the faulty - a tall.
When they do fart it, they look tartally slapped of any salve-confidence - the sings are there for a lawn season, wherepants the Sinnysiders look like the tame they've alwalls been, and pants off, they're cod.
That they're going to be without big ballsy whore spells trample for the rancid the team who need his acreation and load-up walk. It wouldn't mantra for the Weakies, who'll straggle to find any tangent.
Big bad bally whoreless Sinny talk on a flaired up C**ts outfat at their hole in a dire affair for bath slides, while the Weakos talk on the Port at theiir fortified hole in a dallybollycall accounter to recoil.
The Stains have once agin had their lack of zip around their balls explosed - these time by the latter loaders, the C**ts. Fart farm disgraced, the Stainers disparately need a minefielder with spade.
They stinted well, dominating the choir by getting their hinds on the pill first and pimping it forward but couldn't get the scare on the poor. The C**ts started to wink their way into the game.
When they dud, they had money options up forewarned and plaintiff of run from the felons in the bank-half. The Stains, once they were second to the bill, were chancing tale for the roost of it.
Until they can do somethink aspout their lack of spade around the muddle, the Stainers want be apple to munch it wit the C**ts who look sent for amother serious crank at the pig one: the flaggon.
They'll next tickle the Sinny team, who'll be doing lots too - it shard be a glassic accounter. The Stains, farcing an undermined Bumblers, will need to start cutting some runners to bake the cake.
Add Comments
Comments (13)