Round 4, 2009, Richmond lost to Melbourne
First Quarter: the Winners managed to acquire viable confidence from a small advantage, gained after negotiating the loss of a deficit, which the Losers had acquired through the management of the property in their possession, and relinquished at a considerable cost to their organisation.
Second Quarter: maintaining the enterprise that had generated their margin, the Winners managed a significant and lasting advantage through positive actions from critical decisions, as the Losers headed towards the major recession considering the possibility of a depression following the deficit.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated losing ownership of the means of production through the competent management of the competition at board-level, which is where the Losers failed to align their performance and industry, as they managed to negotiate only a small increase in productivity.
Fourth Quarter: managing to maintain their advantage, the Winners experienced a nervous period associated with a surge in the competition's anxiety, which transferred to the board, and was aligned to the increasingly volatile and uncertain climate generated by the Losers' crisis of confidence.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners appreciated the value of acquiring a deserved "reward" for their "hard work" and enterprise, which built "confidence" in their business, and reversed the sentiments of the Losers, as they attempted to transfer the pressure of a crisis into the easing of a major depression.
Second Quarter: maintaining the enterprise that had generated their margin, the Winners managed a significant and lasting advantage through positive actions from critical decisions, as the Losers headed towards the major recession considering the possibility of a depression following the deficit.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated losing ownership of the means of production through the competent management of the competition at board-level, which is where the Losers failed to align their performance and industry, as they managed to negotiate only a small increase in productivity.
Fourth Quarter: managing to maintain their advantage, the Winners experienced a nervous period associated with a surge in the competition's anxiety, which transferred to the board, and was aligned to the increasingly volatile and uncertain climate generated by the Losers' crisis of confidence.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners appreciated the value of acquiring a deserved "reward" for their "hard work" and enterprise, which built "confidence" in their business, and reversed the sentiments of the Losers, as they attempted to transfer the pressure of a crisis into the easing of a major depression.
