Round 4, 2009, Fremantle lost to Saint Kilda
First Quarter: the Winners manufactured a comparative advantage on the board that was aligned with the performance of their targets, which they reached due to the inclination of their industry and the poverty of the Losers', which delivered damage to the aspirations of their business.
Second Quarter: recording only a minor change to their margin, the Winners went into the inevitable recession still managing to hold their competition to account, which served to accelerate the fraudulent perception the Losers held that their business was heading in the right direction.
Third Quarter: the Winners continued the relative productivity of their manufacturing, and kept the costs of going forward down due to the position their business managed, which put organisational pressure on the unsustainable, and negligible, industry of the Losers' business.
Fourth Quarter: continuing to manage the minimisation of the competition's productivity in a contracting environment, the Winners recorded a massive margin through consistently accountable practices, which reduced the Losers to welcoming the smallest turnover on the board with interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast a continuation of the acquisition of overall gains which, "Clearly you'd rather get [them] in the bank than not get [them] in the bank," which the Losers have yet to manage, as expectations of their proficiency, in terms of industry, continued to slide.
Second Quarter: recording only a minor change to their margin, the Winners went into the inevitable recession still managing to hold their competition to account, which served to accelerate the fraudulent perception the Losers held that their business was heading in the right direction.
Third Quarter: the Winners continued the relative productivity of their manufacturing, and kept the costs of going forward down due to the position their business managed, which put organisational pressure on the unsustainable, and negligible, industry of the Losers' business.
Fourth Quarter: continuing to manage the minimisation of the competition's productivity in a contracting environment, the Winners recorded a massive margin through consistently accountable practices, which reduced the Losers to welcoming the smallest turnover on the board with interest.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners forecast a continuation of the acquisition of overall gains which, "Clearly you'd rather get [them] in the bank than not get [them] in the bank," which the Losers have yet to manage, as expectations of their proficiency, in terms of industry, continued to slide.
