First Quarter: the Winners failed to fulfill expectations by recording a deficit that was a product of their inaccurate measures in aligning the means of production with their goals, which gave the Losers confidence in accounting for their competition, and unsustainable enterprise going forward.
Second Quarter: continuing their expensive measurements, the Winners accounted for their deficit and manufactured a margin through their viable business, which generated legitimate concern from the Losers over their generational decline in credible practices distributing the means.
Third Quarter: the Winners managed to generate concern from observers for the overall package, despite the industry of their business providing analysts reason to offer credit, which the Losers managed to stall through their unsustainable business and the liability of their distribution.
Fourth Quarter: led by the board to believe that their gain was in danger, the Winners managed to stimulate observers through the performance of a single asset, which allowed the Losers to gain a loss which reflected poorly on their performance, and managed to reflect the discrepancy in class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners distributed credit for their profit evenly across the board and indicated to observers that the surge in productivity was a product of growth, which discounted the Losers' shortfall in class and the lack of viable targets in their structure, and poor vision going forwards.
First Quarter: the Losers manufactured legitimate concern for recording modest gains in a climate that was assessed by forecasts as liable to push their business in the right direction, and allowed the Winners to manufacture a significantly better loss than had been forecast, despite the poor figures.
Second Quarter: in a dramatic turnaround, the Losers managed to reduce their output to earn a significant loss moving into the recession, which the Winners went into with renewed optimism due to the size and scope of their gain, earned through their initiative in utilising the conditions.
Third Quarter: the Losers rallied late to slash their margin to give observers some interest in investing in their business after it had increased markedly due to the Winners accurately measuring the means against their ultimate targets, and the enterprising accountability associated with their business.
Fourth Quarter: carried forward by their confidence, the Losers managed to secure an overall gain in early trading that was manufactured into a loss by the Winners, who managed to identify the formula they required to acquire the absolute advantage, which they put into practice with industry.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the loss to their decision-making which they generated through the manufacture of dwindling levels of confidence in their business, which the Winners compounded with an interest in giving credit to a number of people in their organisation who did the business.
First Quarter: the Winners secured a marginal advantage through the competent management of their reachable targets and the effective employment of their business, which was negotiated in early trading by the Losers who employed an unsustainable strategy going forward and gained a deficit.
Second Quarter: reaching their targets through the outlook that their targets can manage, the Winners registered a significant gain and went into the gloom of a recession with an advantage over the Losers, who struggled to sustain their output as their effectiveness going forward was minimised.
Third Quarter: the Winners negotiated the uncertainty of the recession by focussing on their strategy and managed to increase their margin following early signs from the Losers of resurgent productivity from radical restructuring netting dividends, leading some observers to return with interest.
Fourth Quarter: driven by optimism, manufactured with confidence, the Winners controlled the means of production and accounted for their competition through measures that generated more gains, which compounded the loss the Losers failed to avert through their targetless organisation.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the massive margin they acquired to the contribution generated from the management of their resources at the highest level, which measured against the Losers' failure to manage the crisis they created through the ownership of a classless structure.
First Quarter: the Losers slashed the deficit they had acquired through toxic assets by a wait-and-see approach which alowed them to make credible entries and secure some interest which had been the exclusive property of the Winners, who failed to consolidate on their advantage secured through capitalising on their co-operative competition.
Second Quarter: through the massive inequality of class, the Losers managed to quadruple their deficit which sent them into the recession considering the propect of a depression which was generated by the Winners consolidaing the ownership of the means to accelerate the anxiety of their competitors organsation, which rolled over.
Third Quarter: the Losers compounded their deficit from the recession by making concessions to their competitors on the board despite registering meagre returns for their industry which served to stimulate the Winners into consolidating their advantage after the recession and returning some confidence, to their credit, to their creditors.
Fourth Quarter: managing to make their competitors pay for their laissez-faire practices, the Losers secured some enterprise from their workers and the excessive turnover of the board, which had a minor impact on the overall margin the Winners had acquired because the individuals in their organisation managed competently.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attributed the generated loss to the decision-making of those with ownership of the means of production, and attempted to defraud creditors into buying that they're growing, despite the Winners generating the gain through negotiating an improved peformance from their sustainable targets and adversity-overcoming.
First Quarter: the Winners activated creditors' accounts of their competitors' poorly delivered measures through their sluggish industry and poorly manufactured entries which lent the credit passed on to the Losers' creditors a large loss of interest in their own thriving business of manufacturing fraudulent accounts.
Second Quarter: stimulated by the accelerating returns the Winners registered on the board, creditors rewarded them with a surging rate of interest, and passed on the information to observers that the Losers generated a deficit from a large loss that had their creditors assessing a bail out plan during the recession.
Third Quarter: the Winners extended their margin and, according to the accounts, provided dividends for observers through a share of the manufacture of their numbers which made the job the Losers were employed in - to generate a sustainable continuum from the interest analysts placed in their business - hard work.
Fourth Quarter: dwindling interest in accurate accounts generated a loss of raw material for analysts to generate more credit for the Winners than the measures they took to disable the Losers in their bid to takeover their competitors through the manufacture of turnover on the board, which failed to eventuate.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed the product of their gain to the resurgent consistency of the output manufactured by their massive targets which added value to the assertions of analysts that the Losers struggle to maintain control of their competitors' class going forward, which is an accurate assessment of a liability.
First Quarter: the Losers managed to register poor returns at the board-level in difficult conditions as slippery creditors passed themselves off as analysts in a bid to defraud observers, who managed to take stock of the account given of the Winners' handling of the environment and exploitation of their targets going forward with capacious economy.
Second Quarter: a loss of fortune generated a false attribution of a decline from creditors after the Losers managed to simulate a doubling of their deficit through their deteriorating capital which failed to account for the credit due to the Winners, who managed to free up their capital and, in the climate, manufactured excellent rewards for their work.
Third Quarter: the Losers negotiated the period following the major recession through their steady output and their committment to their organisation, which creditors endeavoured to conceal and supplied the Winners with no account for their dwindling margin, except for their continuing industry and their competitors' inaccurate measures.
Fourth Quarter: slippery creditors supplied observers with a meagre account of the Losers ineptitude in registering productivity on the board and compromised their legitimacy which was also distributed to the Winners, who added a small gain to their overall margin which analysts had to attribute to their legitimate targets and accuracy with the means.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers attempts to divert a depression caused by their declining industry were given added value by creditors passing fraudulent accounts off as legitimate and denying analysts any raw material with which to invest interest in the Winners, except for speculations going forward, which reinforced the presence of slippery accounts.
First Quarter: the Winners managed the operation of their business through the discipline of their organisation and a structure which allowed their class to capitalise on the Losers' failure to develop an effective strategy going forward for managing the rapidly expanding deficit, after a period of early trading gave observers signs of interest in credit.
Second Quarter: aligning performance with figures, the Winners manufactured maximum productivity for their industry on the board through accurately measuring the means against their goals and the Losers' dwindling supply, which declined dramatically due to an excessive lack of accounting for their competitors' organisation and their own shortfall.
Third Quarter: the Winners' explosively accelerating gains were stalled by the major recession which allowed them to assess the collective benefits of their partnership which had the effect of allowing the Losers to increase the dividends from their mediocre performance, which had the net effect of delaying the decline of interest in some quarters.
Fourth Quarter: generating significant additional gains, the Winners profitted from their application to their organisation, which is built on the distribution of manufacture through reachable targets, which had the impact of driving the Losers into a near-depression after counting the cost of a structure made redundant through their lack of class.
Fifth Quarter: the Winners attributed their massive margin to the turnover their board generated through accurate measures and the pressure their organisation placed on the Losers, who supplied analysts with alarming reports about their dwindling industry which amounts to a loss of confidence in their organisation and sustainable expectations.
First Quarter: the Losers employed the strategy of owning the means of production and holding their competitors' business operations to account which paid a dividend despite the inaccurate records registered by the board and the due diligence of the Winners, who managed to record modest returns for their industry and insecure property management.
Second Quarter: counting the cost of their cautious attempts to manufacture records at the board-level through their fraudulent practices, the Losers forced creditors into instability bought on by the Winners monopolising the means of production and centralising control of their ownership of property, once the disputes had been managed successfully.
Third Quarter: the Losers negotiated the terms of their deficit, despite their competitors' interest in giving them credit, through industry and ownership of the means but failed to capitalise which accounted for the Winners managing to negotiate their deteriorating productivity due to costly inaccuracies and the extent of their existing margin.
Fourth Quarter: co-operating with their competitors, the Losers allowed their deficit to increase through their failure to own disputed property but slashed the margin when their competitors, the Winners, delivered on their earlier promise to relax any accounting for their competitors' interest and place the credit for their value on their collective individualism.
Fifth Quarter: the Losers managed to negotiate any credit observers' interest raised through observing the value of the class in their structure and transferring large amounts to the Winners, who recounted to analysts the influence the last recession had on reinforcing the value they place in manufacturing a structure that works because of class.
In a barn grinching meeting between the Crowes and the Whiners, there was one winker: foody. The other winker was the detritus Crowes who hung on in a thraller at the whore of footy.
The coin spun brightly and tightly with broth slides patting the cramps on their hop-ponies before the Crowes startled, acted up and found some gorey. The Plougher went the knacker to no afail.
So even are the Crowes across the fold it's heard to pickle one out for spatial mention, but, like all slugs, they reload heavenly on their senor ployers. The Plougher shawled they can still cunt it.
It's heard to see how they can threaten for the flog but they might sneak into the fatals, whereas the Crowes look to have settled on their roles as a snuff eunuch that will take some beating.
We'll half a flairidea apout them when they've furnished with the Gawks in yet amother clinger of a cane, while the Plougher hoist the Loins in a bottle for the also-wans that should refoil all.
The Mudpipes fleet of fleas just jumped from also-wan to genuine can-can dancer with a complex termination of the stickiling Taggers. The Caringbush are on the march in April with good plyers ail over.
They started stringly, opening out to a comfy league and maintaining cat-troll for the latter whore. The Taggers need to snort themselves art quaintly or else many of them won't be plying much lankier.
Impressive yanksters in the rack and in the coy pastes have bin added to the ready Madpipes outfit making them stranger than last yore. The Tags have many seniors on the side who look con.
With an evil spread across the fold, the Pipes will be hard to smoke for the yore and will complete against anybardy. The Taggers will do will to bottom out and clear their last of the tiresome oldies.
Killingward will put the cramps on the Poos wince they farce up in a bottle of old enemas: too even across the pork, while the mighty flighting Taggers will do bottle with the researgeant Dunkers.
The C**ts wharful whinge over the slapsticking Daemons was a tantamount to an arsesore as they awfulcame some forkartful ploys around the grind. That they stole one playing so podly will bring peas.
The result, never in spout, was loomly thinks to a bag of coals from their new spoonhead in the coalsquat. In their, their operanuts made to many oriental masstakes that resulted in arsey goals.
Lacking their usual cohesion, the C**ts still got the chocolates over a fastly improved Daemons outfit that was able to put thins in sequins at fast. They wan match more of the pill and rank bitter.
The greatest team of awful were always going to straggle after the farked but will need to address their envelopes if their to make it to their desalination. The Emos will be facing a lot of saltiness this season pooper.
Farcing fannied rifles next time, the C**ts will be hooping to whimp the Stains with their airy racks, while the Emos tack on the Woos in what could be a dangle game for the Cankers; they'll prefoil.
The Sinny Swanks took out the Loins on a slappery knot at the hose of folly in a pair of tights and wearing underpants over the top. The Swankys are stilt coin to be hand to bait, at least earily, this so soon.
They look to be fat and faring well while the Loins were simply played with at the harems of the Sinny team. Bear in mud that the Sinny team have the weird over their Loins, but its clear they look could.
Atypically evil perforation across the puddle was manly reasonable for the factory and of course the pleasure on the opposition bladder carter also heaped a nut. Not meany slides can overcome Sinny's pleasure.
You'd expect broth slides to be whingeing around the ate this ear but with a moll evil speed across the paddle you just wouldn't know. Both slides have snorious delatencies that will clump in to phew.
The Swankys hoist the Weakies necked wake in what looms as a wellknit bottle of farce ruffles, while the Loins travel to play the Fortified Whinos in a bottle for the insomniacs; that will be a pewter.
In a fleafloating afflair the Flighting Bombers have dropped a big one on the heads of the Poobuggers as they prefailed in a bottle of the ceiling dwellers. It was a wrecked ankling deflate for the Poos.
The hay scarring munch was a sin for sore bums as at nefarious times either slide looked like completely slapping. In the wishup it was the pants and flairs of Bumblers that pulled their opponents off.
The Plumpicker's starry plyers on snog couldn't stomp a more evil Bumbler's eunuch from tanking the cank in what moist sourly rankle with their soupeaters. The Bumblers canthink their lanky ones for the wink.
Nuffer slide is gong to summon too much this ear but both will be opting to tighten up their tickling if they're to get munch joy out of the so soon. The tampon slides are adapt at constricting their opponents.
They Bumblers may get another could flea running match when they furnished with their ghosts: the Dillbogs, while the Plumboggers meet arch gnomesis, the Pipers in a match that could link up.
The flailing Wet Toast Weakies have snuffed another lapse to the Fleamonkey Donkers in a reputedly pooslating game at the home of footy. The Donkers might just have sent themselves up for the yore.
In a class cone all day, the Dockers held swaying on the swing thanks to the putsch of their bog kipper who battered a bag. The Cur of the Weakies chewed his hard-on and was amply supported by his legs.
Shooing extra zips around their balls thanks to the injunction of youth, the winking Dunkers fraught hard to maintain an ascendacy they had cornered before the mine broke. Behind their eaten balls, the Weakies tried to.
You'd have to be skinning testicles to think that this means the Fleo side is going to be earily sound this ear but it's a tart, while the Weakies will have to fright toot and snail to vent the runs on the bard.
Harrassing the Taggers next whack, the Donkers canned look backwards after they've encountered for them at home. The Toasters will tank on old enemas the Swarmies when they go on the rowed by plane.
Comments (9)
Add Comments