Round 2, 2009, Adelaide lost to Saint Kilda
First Quarter: in a sharply contracting environment, the Losers distributed responsibility for productivity in an attempt to stimulate liquidity from the running of their business. The Winners, owed an outstanding debt, placed pressure on their competitors' supply and capitalised on their breaks with efficient productivity from their viable targets.
Second Quarter: the Losers gave creditors reason to lose pessimism with an improved performance on the board - equated to confidence in their efficient distribution. The Winners manufactured a small loss for an overall margin that had them headed for the recession with renewed optimism in a moderately saturated environment.
Third Quarter: held to account for the running of their business, the Losers went into a decline that precipitated a pessimistic outlook from their creditors that lent confidence to observers. The Winners capitalised on their absolute advantage with the manufacture of productive gains recorded on the board from opportunistic business practices.
Fourth Quarter: the Losers profitted from the benefit of modest initial gains which were rapidly converted into a massive deterioration of the margin as the pressure decimated their industry. The Winners cornered their competitors' share of the means of production in the difficult environment and surged to huge gains with their productivity soaring.
Fifth Quarter: forced to account for their losses to analysts, the Losers gave creditors reason to question their interest under the pressure of a contraction of growth in the running of their business. The Winners utilised the pressure of a contracting environment they were largely responsible for creating and gained the interest of analysts, if not observers.
Second Quarter: the Losers gave creditors reason to lose pessimism with an improved performance on the board - equated to confidence in their efficient distribution. The Winners manufactured a small loss for an overall margin that had them headed for the recession with renewed optimism in a moderately saturated environment.
Third Quarter: held to account for the running of their business, the Losers went into a decline that precipitated a pessimistic outlook from their creditors that lent confidence to observers. The Winners capitalised on their absolute advantage with the manufacture of productive gains recorded on the board from opportunistic business practices.
Fourth Quarter: the Losers profitted from the benefit of modest initial gains which were rapidly converted into a massive deterioration of the margin as the pressure decimated their industry. The Winners cornered their competitors' share of the means of production in the difficult environment and surged to huge gains with their productivity soaring.
Fifth Quarter: forced to account for their losses to analysts, the Losers gave creditors reason to question their interest under the pressure of a contraction of growth in the running of their business. The Winners utilised the pressure of a contracting environment they were largely responsible for creating and gained the interest of analysts, if not observers.
